Jump to content

dgrid

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dgrid

  1. or as Moats himself said in interview... he he I was 4! he he he cracked me up listenin to it
  2. +1 I think we need to find a solid MLB to play next to Poz. Greg Jones sounds good, but not for middle. Would have to take on blockers well. FWIW, here's what Walter Ftball has to say (dont think they're always accurate tho) Greg Jones, OLB, Michigan State - Scouting Report Height: 6-1. Weight: 228. Projected 40 Time: 4.61. Projected Round (2010): 2. 10/9/10: Jones best fit at the next level is weakside linebacker with his outstanding range in coverage and his ability to be a run-and-hit linebacker. He is very fast and seems to always be around the ball. 5/12/10: A bit undersized right now, Greg Jones had a terrific junior campaign, notching 154 tackles, 14 TFL and nine sacks. scouting report
  3. I do like the TD/INT ratio 21/11 better than you'd think w/ his occasional wild throws.
  4. very cool Bartshan! watching him improve will be rewarding. Dogs dont give a crap about Plaza Hotel, long as they have a good pack to hang w/. The neurotic cat will tracked, hunted, and herded by that dog! Australian Shepherd / Beagle mix? as a beagle owner & knowledgable of Aussie's, I'll say ya got your hands full! DAILY exercise will be mandatory, not even an option. Until he's maybe 10 yrs old or so.
  5. assume the injury in Jets game. He's worn that at least since KC game link
  6. that will be GREAT for 2010!! then next yr maybe it'll be the Pats we keep out of playoffs
  7. pretty much what Ditka said, but he did say the Bills play hard WHEN THEY SHOW UP. very important words, as the Minn game showed. but yeah that was awesome to hear!!
  8. Rogers may not play, he's injured & not practicing
  9. hell yeah they are, they're running in her direction
  10. I dont see them scrapping the 3-4 next yr. 2011 will be Part II of the rebuild, and just because the 3-4 didnt work out too well, doesnt mean they'll stop going in that direction. They choose to go to 3-4 when they were ill-equipt for it in 2010, my $ is on them staying the course. my opinion, which is meaningless, is that they shouldnt have switched in the 1st place, w/ all the other areas of need. I do see advantage to goin back to 4-3, w/ our personel and the fact it's gotta be getting easier to get 4-3 style D-linemen, w/ so many teams playin 3-4 now. But that doesnt mean the FO will.
  11. No, I think he could see some time playing center.
  12. what? is this the daily joke post? talk about changin horses in midstream
×
×
  • Create New...