The Wiz

Shakir and Cook already looking pretty good against a 1st team defense.

Keenum floating everything in the red zone.

That's what they said on the broadcast.

pretty much all 1st team

Shakir-a

Better not seeing the DB's instead of seeing ghosts though, right?

Apparently the field in Chicago looks awful. Not watching the game but everyone on WGR has been saying they can't believe that Mahomes even played it was so bad.

It's always good to surround yourself with people that care. Just depends on what they care about.

Maybe he can audition for when they make Allen's bio-flick. I mean hell warner got one.

Couldn't have been Jerry, he doesn't socialize.

It was sent to him from Darcy's fax machine.

Well his off field stuff was 50/50. But now we know he will be getting used to having someone on top of him.

So he had a good day in the court of public opinion it seems.

And that's what his team is telling him. He apologizes for one, then he's at fault for all of them. Saying "I didn't think anything I did was wrong" at least leaves doubt. The former admits guilt.

With just the head shots that Burfict laid on him (2 bad head shots without even looking that hard) I wouldn't doubt he has some sort of CTE.

I thought it was "The Tongue Twister"

You would think that the Watson camp wouldn't want it either. Imagine they take the lawsuit and then sometime late in the season they decide to agree with the NFL and he ends up serving the remaining 11 games but it's already week 15-16-17 whatever. That would mean those game checks he's going to lose are going to be from his year 2 contract that are only 3454x more than he would lose this year if he just took the full season (and yes, that is a made up number but I know it will be more than the ~300k he will lose as of now).

He's going to serve 6 games in either event so the worst case scenario is that Watson only gets 6 games if the federal court hears the case and sides with Robinson on the punishment.

Since there were only 4, or 5 maybe, cases that the NFL investigated, my guess is he could only be asked about those specific ones. I understand that part of it but hasn't federal court usually washed their hands of most of these things and tell them to "clean up your own house"?

Forgive my ignorance but what exactly is there to settle? The NFL has total say at this point I thought?

"I have nipples Rod, can you milk me?"

You know football is right around the corner when "must win" games are being discussed. 😆

I understand that just the way he phrased it with being winners first made me think of it. There are plenty of players that probably "mail it in" is the point. Always good to hear that they (the team) aren't happy if they lose. I played in a beer league for hockey and quit because it felt the same way. They didn't care about winning or playing the game so I quit. Just didn't feel right to be ok with losing.

I just noticed Josh in his presser giving a line from "Shoresy" (LetterKenny spin off). Allen: "It's guys that wanna win, it's guys competing, it's guys that.... I know it sounds weird but... it's guys that don't want to lose" Shoresy: "It's not that they don't love to win; they don't hate to lose" That's a seriously strong mentality to have from people being paid millions every year to play a game.