boyst

Von Miller

one of the best geeetar players there ever was and never gets credit for it @Gugny agrees!

Glenn Campbell was awful in it, that's the only thing that sticks out. He could not act to save his life.

Never, ever trust someone with a hyphenated name.

did he like movies about gladiators?

Rip Nothing good happens after 2am.

While I support the decision of the NFL not to hire him I think ESPN did him completely dirty by leaking his emails. He's a douche anyway

Great news. Continue to heal!

Enjoy your freedom.

I know it may confuse you since you spend so much time at the truck stop, but you do not have to kneel for every man you see. We don't mind that you do, this is 2024... But most of us aren't like you. And we are all glad of that. You're probably the worst efforted troll to grace PPP.

see, the problem is this board has a useful idiot in Tiberius which we all know is just fodder for the uninitiated. There is no need to compete for the bottom - he is much better at being an idiot than you because he's at least entertaining.

...Joe Biden literally said he picked her because of her gender and race...

this over Hillary would be so freaking awesome as a giant finger to hillary.

show them. more importantly: show them here. otherwise stfu

while reid is an offensive genius he brought out subpar WR's and mediocre running backs with a struggling TE until midseason. his entire offense was struggling but he managed to have them score enough that on the other end of the ball his defense held the unit together. mcdermott could never do this. he needs too many blue chip players in positions.

only if he shares!!!!!!

Tl dr

i wouldn't have brought it up if i did not know the subject matter sufficiently. while you're lookin it up you can look at what Kerry had done working out and behind the scenes of the Iran nuclear deal during Trumps tenure. you can look at a several of politicians and what they have done. further, the office of the president elect does not exist. what is interesting is every former president and therefore former first lady receives almost every piece of intel from the government, even up to the "q" rating for interests of national security. that means even Jimmy Carter still gets almost all of the presidential briefs - well, maybe access to them. before taking office you do not receive all of this information - however. no joke, i want to know what gun that is because it sounds like a terribly unreliable and poor gun. i'd never want it! sweetie, you can't even answer a question. so, be a good dear and ask your mother to turn off the content blocker for your browser so you can go unwind.

lol this was short enough i read it... i'm an old vietnamese lady who fought against the american military and came to this country... yep. you believe it.

you're on the JV roster. go ahead and stay on the bench, toots. he must not have made the bullet points and 1) 2) 3) things. those clearly make it seem like he has credible intelligence and honest abilities in discussion. hell, i even acknowledged what neither he or i don't know. he's just too foolish to sit at the adults table. let him meddle here with the likes of Pete i didn't read any of this.

you didn't answer the question. you're incapable of integrity on this discussion. have a tremendous & fulfilling day.

on that note, you know... we should have a celebration at chick filet. as long as i can go down the slide first.

🤦‍♂️ two things... 1) i asked a question which typically doesn't mean you ask a question to follow up a question 2) i did not proffer a solution to Trump's dilemma, nor do i have any idea what he is going to do next (and i'd bet he doesn't know what he is going to do next for that matter).

that's a lot of talk for not understanding the issue and conflating it... the discussion you began was is Trump saying he is going to do something the same as Kerry having already actually done it? or to play by your bullsht: 1) ok 2) ok 3) ok 4) Trump did not say he would violate the Logan Act. 5) ok 6) i do not know if the penalty would qualify as jail time and this would be entirely new turf for the office of the presidential elect so... to go back to how you cannot discuss this honestly i will pose the question again as noted by point 4. When did Trump say he would violate the Logan Act? I have highlighted both of the questions to help your confusion. the first question is one of interpretation which cannot offer a wrong answer - in other words oyu're free to offer your opinon. the second question is one of fact - you literally must provide that trump said he would violate the law as you claim.

ok, how is that illegal to state that? following up... he can state that... he can say whatever he wants. he has not yet taken action yet like Kerry very much did in working with Iran and other countries. further; the office of the president elect (which isn't a real thing) has no power recognized by the federal government or any entity by the government. biden created this office and began taking power while assuming office a little beyond the scope of previous presidents - even creating a lectern and backdrop. so, in theory trump could be in violation of the Logan Act if he were to begin negotiating on behalf of the united states to end the war. however, if he is simply speaking to both sides saying that the war needs to be solved that gets gray area. further, anyone can easily infer that he is saying that both sides would be wise to end it before he takes office. Zelensky is already talking about having the war end by the end of the year, as it is. his corruption will hopefully be gone and one day i hope to see him hang from the gallows.