
All_Pro_Bills
Community Member-
Posts
6,910 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by All_Pro_Bills
-
They're attempting to avoid the mess and disarray that would be publicly on display by removing the President through some official action such as invoking the 25th amendment. To do this they need to convince or coerce Biden to step down "voluntarily". There are a number of reasons he's resisting the idea.
-
Biden Has Covid
All_Pro_Bills replied to Trump_is_Mentally_fit's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I agree with your assessment of the virus mutations but its still a danger to people with many pre-existing conditions. I work in the health care industry and we produce a COVID reports and data every week which communicates the impact of the virus with any specific alerts to many private and government organizations so I can strongly tell you the industry is still focused and aware of the problem. Its not just "right wing nuts". This administration has a real credibility issue when it comes to being forthcoming with facts and the truth so the natural inclination of many at this point is to take a default position that they're lying. -
That really isn't relevant here. The issue is the Secret Service always performs a risk assessment of the site and develops a security plan based on that assessment. According to sources speaking outside official agency channels that plan including securing the roof top from where the shooter was positioned. That plan obviously wasn't followed and the head of the DHS and SS are making excuses rather than giving an honest and open answer to plainly acknowledge the security failure. Saying the roof of that building was too steep and dangerous to put any agents or sharpshooters on is absurd. As demonstrated by the would-be assassin it was just fine. It's also alleged Trump security detail was compromised because SS agents were re-directed to the security detail of Dr. Jill in Pittsburgh. A significantly low level threat target whereas who is a bigger target threat than Trump? That's why the Secret Service needed to enlist the assistance of local police. A team they never drilled or worked with before. Another risk.This redeployment has been officially denied. Like @leh-nerd skin-erd said yesterday, the governments core operating philosophy is to "avoid transparency at all costs". That doctrine appears to have once again been invoked here.
-
J.D. Vance - Character and Policies
All_Pro_Bills replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
My conclusion is nothing will be fixed until everything breaks. -
Thomas Matthew Crooks & Ryan Routh
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
It sounds like all this diversity and inclusion indoctrination being pushed and employed by academic geniuses in the educational system isn't working out too well in creating a desired progressive utopia. -
J.D. Vance - Character and Policies
All_Pro_Bills replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Whatever anybody wants to call it when the government hands out trillions of borrowed money to people to consume goods and services without requiring them to produce any equivalent output of goods and services or creates businesses that require subsidies to produce products or services nobody wants at "market prices" it creates an imbalance in the supply and demand of things which generally plays out through adverse consequences such as inflation. -
Thomas Matthew Crooks & Ryan Routh
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Avoiding transparency at all costs. That is a simple yet very insightful conclusion regarding the basic operating principles of our government. Provide the minimum required amount of information or facts and stonewall any attempts to provide further details. I should add, then moan and groan that malcontents are spreading conspiracies! -
Thomas Matthew Crooks & Ryan Routh
All_Pro_Bills replied to BillsFanNC's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I think people prefer to generate conspiracies rather come to grips with the truth which in this case is the people assigned the responsibility for protecting a Presidential candidate and former President, those we've been told and expect are the best of the best, acted with such a high degree of incompetence that it borders on negligence. -
Attempted Assassination on President Trump (x2)
All_Pro_Bills replied to Walking Tall's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Until some other nut job says I'm sick and tired of these liberal savages shooting their mouths off and shoots Black dead. -
Attempted Assassination on President Trump (x2)
All_Pro_Bills replied to Walking Tall's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Presents a threat? Like crawling onto the roof of a building and assuming a shooting position facing the podium 150 yards away from a political rally? He should have been shot dead the moment that was evident. But they hesitated to act. I am only guessing but i suspect they were working under rules of engagement that required them to get "permission" to neutralize the suspect. And the order was slow in coming. -
Attempted Assassination on President Trump (x2)
All_Pro_Bills replied to Walking Tall's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
The network was worried either Mika or Joe would say something like "too bad he missed". The quiet part out loud that the extreme left are all thinking but the majority are smart enough not to say. -
Its been a bad few days for this Olbermoron clown. A judge rules your team did something obviously unconstitutional. So you suggest? Some blatantly unconstitutional politically motivated retribution.
-
And the 2024 Race Begins
All_Pro_Bills replied to The Frankish Reich's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Given all their hateful rhetoric is this a good time for us all to demand the left pledge to accept the results of a free and fair election in November? That's been their demand of the other side. Of course that demand from Democrats has been predicated on the assumption that their candidate wins. But what if they lose? I'll make my own assumption. All bets will be off the table if Trump wins. -
I prefer Tulsi Gabbard assuming she'd accept the job. She seems honorable, smart, and to me she has the right positions on the important details and issues. She's one of the few people the establishment would hate to see as President more than they hate Trump. As the VP choice she would also neutralize and be better able to address identity political attacks than a man. In any VP debate with Harris she'd be in a battle of wits with an unarmed woman. None of the other choices I've heard of appear to bring as much to the table. Tulsi said this.. “The Democratic Party of today is wholly unrecognizable to the party that I joined over 20 years ago,” Gabbard said. “And I hear from or meet Democrats from across the country, almost every day—whether people send me a DM on Instagram or send me an e-mail, or I run into them in the airport—(former Democrats) who express the same thing,” she continued. “People who may have been lifelong Democrats or people who were raised in a Democrat family, just saying that they don’t recognize today’s Democrat party and they have no connection to the insane, woke, warmongering policies of today’s Democratic Party.” This describes me almost exactly (in bold).
-
Project 2025 is the work of the Heritage Foundation. Nothing to do with Trump. I doubt any of these drama queens like Swalwell have read it. They just pass around and repeat the same old Dem talking points. Orange Man bad! We good! They bore me to tears at this point with their act. Get some new material that might be remotely believable.