Jump to content

thebandit27

Community Member
  • Posts

    21,985
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thebandit27

  1. Looks like a thoroughly uninspired choice for the titular character: https://www.thewrap.com/noah-centineo-he-man-masters-of-the-universe/
  2. Good idea, but I don't see it happening. Seattle is slated to have over $80M in cap room next season, so they should easily be able to fit all of Wagner/Wilson/Clark under their cap...also, a Clark trade would leave them with zero players from the 2019 starting DL under contract for 2020. I'd like to be wrong about that, but I have my doubts. Plus, I don't see McDermott signing up for this: https://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/university-michigan/2014/11/17/frank-clark-michigan-football/19157491/
  3. Yes. Been all over him since last year. He's active, instinctive, athletic; everything you'd want in a player. I think he's going to slip because of his size limitations, but--like Milano--I think he'll prove himself worthy of 3-down duty in the NFL. For good measure, look who his top comparable is: https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/bobby-okereke
  4. Kevin Givens - DL/Penn State flashed at his pro day; seems like a McDermott-prototype from a physical standpoint.
  5. Here's your guy...the next Milano in round 5: https://www.nfl.com/prospects/bobby-okereke?id=32194f4b-4540-0459-e914-d34827147fed
  6. The only real support that I see for the always open claim on Beasley is that he ranked 7th among pass catchers in average yards of separation per route run according to NextGenStats.
  7. I feel like it was the Jacksonville game, but not 100% sure on that
  8. Value signing for sure...give the team a LOT of flexibility with how they structure their corner play. EJ can play boundary or slot, as can Ryan Lewis, so that's probably a competition for boundary CB3 and slot backup.
  9. This. That's one reason that I'm in favor of drafting a right tackle--a guy that has shown that he can play on that side. I'll get into your boy Edwards a little more, but my first glance said that he was a highly-developmental guy. Give me Scharping in round 3 and I'll feel really good about that RT spot for a while. Oh I'll get your a Williams... https://www.nfl.com/prospects/trayveon-williams?id=32195749-4c18-5325-3179-dd521a18c706
  10. Not surprising...he's got a very similar play style to Feliciano, who coach Johnson really likes.
  11. Dawkins really struggled adjusting to the right side of the line in the '17 preseason. Unless that's changed, he should really stay on the left
  12. Best combination of 5 is what I said (several times). Maybe Dawkins is the best LT on the team, but looking at his overall body of work at LT versus Nsehke's overall body of work at LT, it's not exactly conclusive. The other component is that Nsehke's best position is clearly LT--he's not nearly as good at LG, and is a bit less comfortable at RT. Given that Dawkins' best position may potentially be LG, the staff needs to weigh the advantages of all situations. It's entirely possible that Dawkins at LT and Nsehke at RT gives them the best combination; it's also possible that they may get a better combination with a slight step down at LT in Nsehke (assuming he's even a step down, which his work at LT hasn't been to this point) and Dawkins at LG. All options should be on the table IMO
  13. Don't rule out Mongo...Coach Johnson likes him a lot
  14. He seems to be more comfortable in a power scheme, so I suppose it'll depend upon how much power-man Daboll incorporates into the offense. I do want to stress that he's not exactly a liability in a zone scheme either; just doesn't quite allow him to "seek and destroy" the way he's most accustomed to playing
  15. I'm thinking something like 2 years, $14M with $8M gtd
  16. You still clearly don't understand what I said re their respective PFF grades or the situation in general. As typically happens in a discussion with you, I've reached the point where I can go no further without a dramatic shift in your willingness to engage in critical thinking, so it's time to move on.
  17. Interesting. Looks like they may view him as a potential sub-package guy in pass D situations.
  18. Not sure how you draw that conclusion. I will say that you may want to go back and watch him in 2016-17 when they ran more power-based run schemes. You'd see what you're missing.
  19. Best 5 on the field, whether it's with Dawkins at LT or not. It's that simple, but you still can't understand it. That long string of gibberish affirms it. And yes, you did sling insults, but I don't mind. I just figured you'd want to know that it makes folks that might otherwise take you half seriously think better of it.
  20. You've once again proven that you are fully incapable of following a discussion. Seriously.
  21. I would be satisfied with knowing that 80% of our starting line consists of Dawkins, Spain, Morse, and Nsekhe. Gotta figure that competition between Teller, Long, Mongo, and Boettger for that RG spot would bring out the best in everyone.
×
×
  • Create New...