LeviF

And there's the rub. Anyone who's been paying attention knows how the abortion conversation from the left has changed in the last 10 years. And that change is exactly why I am now pro-life.

Stop caring©

Exactly. And in the immortal words of the great sage Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr.: "No mo' talkin', I'm walkin' and I'm poppin' the clip Glock on the hip, set-trippin', drippin' and ****, If you act like a b***h, you get smacked like a b***h."

haha love it

I only play chess when I drink, and obviously blitz isn't the best forum for that But seriously, I used to play on chess.com all the time. Loved that site.

His lawyers are between a rock and a hard place. Loser capital cases suck for defense attorneys.

As I said in this thread, I'm pretty sure he's channeling his inner Mellencamp.

Not trying to creep you out... but that lonza does look good.

Here's the original recipe, they weren't lyin': http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/126836-appetizers-fried-noodles-w-pickle-juice/

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/25951-oh-this-is-nicereal-nice/

Was there ever a user called Hannibal Lecter here, or am I thinking of another forum?

Oh come on, that's not true. Brb, gotta browse VNN and Stormfront.

So Jesus comes back to pronounce judgment on the world and ends up in this gay dude's apartment, and there are two gay dudes just going at it in there. Jesus shakes his head and goes, "guys, I gotta send you both to hell." So which one does he send first? The bottom. He already has his **** packed.

Well, yeah. Pretty much any religion that's more than 100 years old isn't cool with dudes bangin out other dudes. Seriously not cool with said dudes getting hitched.

Snitches get stitches mother!@#$er. But yeah, solid move.

BRING BACK HOSSAGE

Well I'll say it. This is absurd. What happens if a college like Ball State refuses to play at a neutral site? It is their home game, after all. If it comes down to forfeiting games I'm not sure how long the student-athletes and coaches can be kept happy about it.

Obligatory:

Mennonites do, at least as far as I'm aware.

My argument is that the general terms used for sexual sin (especially in the Pauline letters) were used intentionally to cover any and all sex outside of the bounds of a marriage between one man and one woman. There are lots of kinds of sex that you can say aren't covered specifically in the New Testament, but I would say that they are most certainly covered generally by the terms used by Paul (for example: bestiality).

You're playing the same game that Justice (and other Muslims) play when they claim that Jesus never said he was God. It's a silly game based on a poor reading of the book.

...says the Trekkie.

This is true. But there are general condemnations of illicit sex (that is, sex outside of the bounds of marriage) many times over.

Let me ask this - who should be responsible for carrying out the penalty for apostasy?

Give the guy some credit; at least he's honest about it.