I also dont get why everyone loves Bradford soooooo much. He played on a team that was built around the OL and running game. Bradford benefited from being on that team. Yea I know he won the Heisman, because he had great stats, but he never took over a game and won it for his team. When he was asked to do so vrs Texas and Florida he failed. Think Mark Sanchez of the Jets this year. Is anyone going to say Sanchez is a great QB because he lead his team to the AFC Championship game? It was their running game. That was Bradfords 2008 season to a lesser extent.
Now this is not a big deal for most, but I put a lot of emphasis on that factor. A QB needs to carry their team in college if they want to succeed in the NFL. Thats why I said Matt Ryan was the next Peyton Manning level QB when he came out. He carried a completely over matched BC team all the way to #2, and hasnt disappointed at all in the NFL.
Clausen carried the ND offense game after game after game. He did it well too. People question his maturity, and dont think he can handle the pressure of being a 1st round pick, he was the QB at ND for Gods sakes. The QB... at Notre Dame. Please name me one player in college football that deals with more pressure, because you cant. Clausen has reached his ceiling? Why? He improved 10 fold from his soph to jr year, how is that possibly an indication he wont improve more? And since when is playing in a pro system a negative - all of a sudden hes coached up to his max? Im calling shenanigans. Not liked by teammates?... I saw an interview with Golden Tate where he raved about Clausen as a player and person.
I think people read into things way too much. Both these guys will do well in the NFL, I would be happy drafting both. But I think Clausen will do better, and I would take him over Bradford if I had the luxury. (BTW I do think Clausen is a major tool)