The Big Cat Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I'm tired of reading "5 INT's should have meant destroying the Jets." Well, I posted this Sunday, but I'll repeat: Of our 16 points, 13 of them came off INT's. Of the five non-special teams INT's we came down with, we scored on THREE of the ensuing possessions. Of the two we DIDN'T score on, one was Fitzpatrick's first series. Got it? Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pBills Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 We should have destroyed the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I don't have it... I though you had it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dog14787 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I don't have it... I though you had it... I have had it, but now I've really lost it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Do your Bills and Beers podcasts feature this type of logic, or does your mom read over the show notes beforehand and edit them for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemhoff Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I thought that Trent had "it" or at least he had more of "it" than JP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 who's on first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 20, 2009 Author Share Posted October 20, 2009 Do your Bills and Beers podcasts feature this type of logic, or does your mom read over the show notes beforehand and edit them for you? No my mommy's to busy scooping poop out of my pants. But may be you should listen and find out. You're awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFinkle Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 No my mommy's to busy scooping poop out of my pants. But may be you should listen and find out. You're awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I'm tired of reading "5 INT's should have meant destroying the Jets." Well, I posted this Sunday, but I'll repeat: Of our 16 points, 13 of them came off INT's. Well technically 6 interceptions including that special teams thing. Which means just over 2 points per interception. Even if you count only 5 of those it still isn't even 3 points per. I don't know what the average points per interception is, but I suspect 2 or 3 is damn low. So for the sake of argument lets call it 5 interceptions. If we score 2 touchdowns (less than half of the total interceptions, not a lofty goal I don't think) and a FG on two, and nothing on one. We win 20 - 13 in regulation. And that is ONLY points off of gifts from Sanchez. Considering we were a 9.5 point dog, I'd call that destroying the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 5 interceptions = 40 points (5 TD's, 5 two-point conversions) Anything less, would have been acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricojes Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 5 interceptions = 40 points (5 TD's, 5 two-point conversions) Anything less, would have been acceptable. Sweet...16 < 40, so the Bills performance was acceptable. End of debate... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach55 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 5 interceptions = 40 points (5 TD's, 5 two-point conversions) Anything less, would have been acceptable. By that logic, if we got nothing you still would have been happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 By that logic, if we got nothing you still would have been happy. I assumed he meant unacceptable. Me thinks it is a typo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternOHBillsFan Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 5 INT's should have meant destroying the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 We should have destroyed the Jets. Trent played the entire 1st half & put up his usual 3 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Trent played the entire 1st half & put up his usual 3 points. You have got to be the most bitter JP supporter I've ever seen, and I truly mean that in the most non hyperbolic way possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 20, 2009 Author Share Posted October 20, 2009 5 INT's should have meant destroying the Jets. Enough already. If it wasn't for the interceptions, we would been destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 You have got to be the most bitter JP supporter I've ever seen, and I truly mean that in the most non hyperbolic way possible. I'm sure there are a number of bitter JP supporters but this is about Trent, JP is no longer a Bill. Edwards would not be a starting QB in the NFL if not for Dick Jauron & when Dick is fired he won't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternOHBillsFan Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Enough already. If it wasn't for the interceptions, we would been destroyed. I was just joking around... all in good fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts