DanInUticaTampa Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 It's just one game. To be in the best overall poition they should be 2-2 against the NFC. This strikes the proper balance between wins and tie-breaker edge. Right now, the Bills are in a tough spot. They are 2-0 so could end up 2-2 but having a home game against a relatively weak team like SF makes it unlikely. you should explain this theory in public. if people don't laugh at you, i will give you a million $$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 It's just one game. To be in the best overall poition they should be 2-2 against the NFC. This strikes the proper balance between wins and tie-breaker edge. Right now, the Bills are in a tough spot. They are 2-0 so could end up 2-2 but having a home game against a relatively weak team like SF makes it unlikely. Have you called the Bills front office to tell them this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murra Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 Yours as well as what? I don't know. Why do I say that phrase? Where did it come from? I find myself saying (and now typing) it very often... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillZerk Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 Dude you are really cracking me up. After thinking about it, i think Mr Crayonz may have stumbled upon the most creative new thinking that could change the course of football for ever. In the way of innovation, it ranks right up there with the blue mountain on the COORS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCBoston Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 is it me or is this the dumbest post in the history of the internet Nah, Al Gore takes credit for that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills7834 Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 It's just one game. To be in the best overall poition they should be 2-2 against the NFC. This strikes the proper balance between wins and tie-breaker edge. Right now, the Bills are in a tough spot. They are 2-0 so could end up 2-2 but having a home game against a relatively weak team like SF makes it unlikely. Oh wise eater of crayons what would we do with out your knowledge? So we should root for the Bills to lose next week and when they play the 49ers? I'm not sure if Jauron knows this, does anyone have his phone number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 So thats why the pats* didnt have homefield last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted September 29, 2008 Author Share Posted September 29, 2008 Dude, you're ignoring my post. As for the inevitability of such a situation, tell that to last year's AFC playoff teams. Not one single tiebreaker. Well the tie-breakers almost always kick in. If they didn't happen last year it makes it even more obvious that they will happen this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ1 Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 is it me or is this the dumbest post in the history of the internet No, you're right in your assessment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 Well the tie-breakers almost always kick in. If they didn't happen last year it makes it even more obvious that they will happen this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills7834 Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 Then why did they beat Minnesota today? And I thought Jeff Fisher was smarter then that. He's not such a smart coach after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 Well the tie-breakers almost always kick in. If they didn't happen last year it makes it even more obvious that they will happen this year. I suggest you never go to a casino, because you're obviously susceptible to gambler's fallacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted September 29, 2008 Author Share Posted September 29, 2008 Oh wise eater of crayons what would we do with out your knowledge? So we should root for the Bills to lose next week and when they play the 49ers? I'm not sure if Jauron knows this, does anyone have his phone number? I think you're being sarcastic but will answer anyway. I think we should probably root for the Bills to lose next week. This doesn't mean the Bills should try to lose. Of course they should try to win. Rooting and playing are two different things. Marv Levy said something like "If I listened to the fans I'd be sitting with them." As for the San Fran game I think losing a game like that at home would hurt too much mentally and might cause other problems. We should root for the Bills in that one. That would put them at 3-1 against the NFC which isn't great but better than 4-0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted September 29, 2008 Author Share Posted September 29, 2008 I suggest you never go to a casino, because you're obviously susceptible to gambler's fallacy. I think you're new here so let me suggest that you out all sex posts on "Off the Wall" and keep them off the football section. And yes, I know it is only a BJ, but it still counts as sex even if Bill Clinton doesn't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillZerk Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 I think you're being sarcastic but will answer anyway. I think we should probably root for the Bills to lose next week. This doesn't mean the Bills should try to lose. Of course they should try to win. Rooting and playing are two different things. Marv Levy said something like "If I listened to the fans I'd be sitting with them." As for the San Fran game I think losing a game like that at home would hurt too much mentally and might cause other problems. We should root for the Bills in that one. That would put them at 3-1 against the NFC which isn't great but better than 4-0. 3-1 is OK but obviously not as balanced as 2-2. I think we should root for two NFC losses to strike the best balance. I would like to add a Marv Levy quote. That is chicken sh*t, chicken sh*t, chicken sh*t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JujuFish Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 3-1 is OK but obviously not as balanced as 2-2. I think we should root for two NFC losses to strike the best balance. I would like to add a Marv Levy quote. That is chicken sh*t, chicken sh*t, chicken sh*t 3-1 is bad. We've already lost all hopes of making the playoffs thanks to our foolish choices of when to win. 1975 season all over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 I think you're new here so let me suggest that you out all sex posts on "Off the Wall" and keep them off the football section. And yes, I know it is only a BJ, but it still counts as sex even if Bill Clinton doesn't think so. maybe you should switch from crayonz to drugz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 maybe you should switch from crayonz to drugz At least he knows that Utica isn't in Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 my head hurts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 At least he knows that Utica isn't in Tampa. yeah it is. there is a store called Utica here in tampa. i work there. we sell half moons and saranac beer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts