Adam Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Just wondering..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Just wondering..... Good move. The Palistians elected them to represent them and what's the harm of talking? Hell, they should be talking. 'They' negotiated with the IRA, right? And the Palistians do have very real grieviences and DESERVE to be heard. Hopefully this is one small step that leads to peace and two states that can live with each other. I just hope some right wing Israeli doesn't "Rabin" Carter for this. I noticed the Israeli secret service wouldn't protect Carter, though. Wonderful allies we have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Jimmy Carter is old and senile. And still as big an idiot as he was when he was in office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted April 15, 2008 Share Posted April 15, 2008 Jimmy Carter is old and senile. And still as big an idiot as he was when he was in office. True enough, yet Ronald Reagan at this point in time, is still better than Bush the younger. Hell, two years ago you would have had a legitimate argument that Carter was better than him. Historians will have them about equal IMO. Bottom of the barrel rejects that shouldn't have been put in charge of a lone Subway franchise. With regards to Carter (the above was just to piss off Wacka) he really needs to shut up. I am tired of hearing about him messing with the process. Sure no one is really doing anything, yet his moment is past. He is being used for propaganda and doesn't even realize it IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lakesider Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Poor Jimmy.... Just go work with Habitat for Humanity and try to forget 1600 PA Avenue and all that flowed thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 I think Carter is a good man and he does what he feels is right, which I respect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albany,n.y. Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Jim Kelly met with Hamas? I hope he found a good WR & TE when he was over there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 16, 2008 Author Share Posted April 16, 2008 Personally, I'm in too much shock over this to even have any opinion right now. A guy that actually has done a lot of charitable things over the years cavorting with terrorists who want Israel destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
In space no one can hear Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Jim Kelly met with Hamas? I hope he found a good WR & TE when he was over there. No, he went there to expand his ownership group to buy the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Jim Kelly met with Hamas? I hope he found a good WR & TE when he was over there. Gibran Hamdan made the introductions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Jim Kelly met with Hamas? I hope he found a good WR & TE when he was over there. Maybe he's teaching them how to throw the bomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Pretty interesting article: "For the sake of Israel, the United States, and the world, it is time for American political discourse to re-engage with reality," wrote Ben-Ami, whose grandparents were among the founders of Tel Aviv and whose father was a militant in the right-wing Revisionist Movement, in a column published Tuesday by the Jewish national daily The Forward. "Voices of reason need to reclaim what it means to be pro-Israel and to establish in American political discourse that Israel's core security interest is to achieve a negotiated two-state solution and to define once and for all permanent, internationally recognized borders." "We need to have a much more robust discussion in this country about what it means to be pro-Israel," said Victor Kovner, a former Corporation Counsel of New York City and a member of the group's advisory council. http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=12701 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Personally, I'm in too much shock over this to even have any opinion right now. A guy that actually has done a lot of charitable things over the years cavorting with terrorists who want Israel destroyed. And again the dems are being cozy with those that want to kill us and our way of life. When will they ever learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Pretty interesting article: "For the sake of Israel, the United States, and the world, it is time for American political discourse to re-engage with reality," wrote Ben-Ami, whose grandparents were among the founders of Tel Aviv and whose father was a militant in the right-wing Revisionist Movement, in a column published Tuesday by the Jewish national daily The Forward. "Voices of reason need to reclaim what it means to be pro-Israel and to establish in American political discourse that Israel's core security interest is to achieve a negotiated two-state solution and to define once and for all permanent, internationally recognized borders." "We need to have a much more robust discussion in this country about what it means to be pro-Israel," said Victor Kovner, a former Corporation Counsel of New York City and a member of the group's advisory council. http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=12701 Herr Molson, why did you leave this part out? In its policy positions, J Street calls for territorial compromises with the Palestinians based largely on the 1967 borders with reciprocal land swaps and the division of Jerusalem. The group also favors strong U.S. support for Israeli-Syrian peace negotiations and direct, high-level U.S. talks with Iran to address all issues of mutual concern, including ending Iranian opposition to Arab-Israeli peace efforts and its support for armed anti-Israel groups in Palestine and Lebanon. Still waiting for the fruits of Pelosi's trip to Damascus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Herr Molson, why did you leave this part out? Still waiting for the fruits of Pelosi's trip to Damascus? Thanks for reading that. Why did you highlight that section? And are you actually implying I'm a Nazi by adding the "Herr" to my name for posting about a Jewish group trying to bring peace to Isreal??? You are so throughly brain washed its funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 You are so throughly brain washed its funny! It would be interesting to hear you explain this statement in detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 yawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 It would be interesting to hear you explain this statement in detail. I assume by "interesting" you mean "surreally ironic"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 My local paper today has a picture of the doddering old fool placing a wreath on the grave of Yassir Arafat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 yawn Exactly. It's not like liberals coddling terrorists is anything new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts