Chef Jim Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 You can speculate about the relative age of SilverNRed, but I really want to know how much an Angels' ticket was in 1993 - let alone 1983 ! I don't know about 1993, but way back in 1983 we didn't even have tickets we just gave them pieces of slate we chiseled off of rocks from the quarry. Yabba dabba doo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 No speculating... A little research points to he was 12... A wee 12... That must be ONE big jersey his uncle bought... Or else?... Silver! It was a hat, you dumbass! And stop trying to make my precious childhood memories into something bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 It was a hat, you dumbass! And stop trying to make my precious childhood memories into something bad. Wow!... Lighten up Francis! Sorry... My bad! Remedial Can't Take a Joke 101 is needed... As much as I need Remedial Can't Read a Post 101... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted April 13, 2007 Share Posted April 13, 2007 Wow!... Lighten up Francis! Sorry... My bad! Remedial Can't Take a Joke 101 is needed... As much as I need Remedial Can't Read a Post 101... IT WAS A HAT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 14, 2007 Share Posted April 14, 2007 IT WAS A HAT!!! With your bridely (if that is even a word... ) aspirations... Who sez you don't have a big head?! Again, my bad... x1000... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Some very important people are taking Global Warming seriously, and even reccommend it be a national security issue: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/us/15warm.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Some very important people are taking Global Warming seriously, and even reccommend it be a national security issue: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/us/15warm.html I hope they got the happy ending with that hardcore of a reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 16, 2007 Author Share Posted April 16, 2007 Some very important people are taking Global Warming seriously, and even reccommend it be a national security issue: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/us/15warm.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 I hope they got the happy ending with that hardcore of a reach. Hardcore reach? Was Marv in on this study? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Hardcore reach? Was Marv in on this study? Given the size of the reach the article writers made, the choice was between a marv comparison, or a reach-around comparison. I went with the latter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverNRed Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Given the size of the reach the article writers made, the choice was between a marv comparison, or a reach-around comparison. I went with the latter. Given the set-up, that was like you setting me up for a one-timer and me burying it in the back of the net. That's called teamwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Given the set-up, that was like you setting me up for a one-timer and me burying it in the back of the net. That's called teamwork. Good. Assists are just as good as the goal. Now somehow we need to show the sabres forwards this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornerville Posted April 16, 2007 Share Posted April 16, 2007 Hardcore reach? Was Marv in on this study? I think Mort was on the mix on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 Here are the facts...an ICE AGE is coming. http://www.globalpsychics.com/involving-yo...s/ice-age.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 Here are the facts...an ICE AGE is coming. http://www.globalpsychics.com/involving-yo...s/ice-age.shtml "As psychics, we have been predicting some significant weather shifts for some years now." Well...they've got to be doing better than meterologists... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted April 17, 2007 Share Posted April 17, 2007 "As psychics, we have been predicting some significant weather shifts for some years now." Well...they've got to be doing better than meterologists... Actually it's kind of an interesting read....once you get by that disclaimer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobblehead Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Worldwide, various governmental and private entities have misused the threat of environmental disaster as a means of imposing a level of planning on all human activities that many found unacceptable. In fact, government, the corporate world and environmental groups should all have faced the real and imminent problems in a clear-headed and practical manner, instead of viewing them through the crazy lens of ideology, be it left or right. Instead, ideology has been placed above need in virtually every case, with the result that the worst possible situation has become true: human activities in the form of greenhouse gas emissions have been allowed to exacerbate a natural cycle, with results that promise to be devastating beyond imagination. This is the most honest thing I have ever read on Global Warming (take out the "worst possible situation has become true" part), and I had to find it on a website for psychics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 While I don't believe in "global warming" (it's more accurately called "climate change'), I fail to see the problem with reigning in consumption of non-renewable energy sources. I also fail to see the problem with reducing the amount of crap (more specifically, carbon) we put into the atmosphere. If a side effect of such actions is a healthier environment, reduced incidences of cancer, healthier oceans, bays, and rivers, and ultimately a healthier planet, what's the problem? Every scientific organization, group, and entity has stated that human actions play a role in the climatic changes we've been experiencing over the past century, save for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. And they don't have an agenda or anything... But then again, it's kind of hard to take an organization too seriously when they proclaim a work of fiction (Crichton's State of Fear) worthy of their organization's 2006 Journalism Award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VRWC Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Good Read! http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/gal..._consensus.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 18, 2007 Author Share Posted April 18, 2007 Good Read! http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/gal..._consensus.html Shutup! No one is interested in contrarian evidence. We have consensus among the "non-agenda despite their funding depending on it" science community. It's not a Frankenstein mob. Really it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts