freester Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. I don't think any one yas seen enough of Cieslak to know weither he will be a good #2 TE or not, I would right him off as the #3 and say they need another just yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. Oregon State's Joe Newton is worth a good look... http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2007/newton_joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hindsight Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I'd be surprised if we draft any offense other than RB or O line This will be a defensive draft IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Miller would be a GREAT 3rd round pick, but TE may be an afterthought with all of our holes to fill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I saw some good things in Cieslak i believe if not turning to fullback he will be a great number 2 tight end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I'd be surprised if we draft any offense other than RB or O line This will be a defensive draft IMO sprinkle WR into that mix. I still haven't dismissed the possibility of nabbing one at 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnTheRocks Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I think think the Bills are in the position where they have to draft for need this season. Which means RB/LB or LB/RB in the first two rounds. I don't expect to see Zach Miller on the board by the late 2nd round. If the Bills could get Michael Bush in the 3rd round, Zach Miller would be a nice pick...maybe considered a little bit of a reach with their pick in the 2nd, but well worth it. All they would have to do is listen to the likes of the ESPN dickheads say the Bills reached but who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I saw some good things in Cieslak i believe if not turning to fullback he will be a great number 2 tight end. Agreed. I am happy with Cieslak as either the #2 TE or FB. He had some nice games last year. Of course, it would be great if Everett finally showed up and stole his job. I wouldn't waste a first-day pick on a TE. Even if we got a real player, it's not as if we'd actually throw to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I'd be scared to death if Ceislak ended up as our FB. He'd be destoyed at the point of attack. Sure he lined up there a little last year but full time!? Please.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I think w/ the exception of LB & RB, we're in a position to draft the "best available athlete". We entered the offseason w/ the only positions in need of upgrading being DL & OL. We brought in 3 new OL including 1 definite & 1 likely starter. We upgraded the DL by retainly Kelsay & trading for the Eagles guy. We lost 2 starting LBs. I think we need to draft a LB in rounds 1 or 2 and I'd prefer to wait until round 3 to pick up the RB (or at least round 2). That means that we've got the possiblity to choose the BAA w/ 2 day one picks. I'll defer to the braintrust at OBD as to whether those picks are DT, CB, TE, WR or whereever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I'd be scared to death if Ceislak ended up as our FB. He'd be destoyed at the point of attack. Sure he lined up there a little last year but full time!? Please.......... He looked okay to me last year as a FB, although I can't recall zoning in on him and his blocking particularly. As a receiver, he offers us a lot more as a FB than Shelton ever did. I personally think FB is an overrated position, which might account for me thinking Cieslak can hold down the fort. I'd rather see us run 1-back sets 90% of the time and throw Cieslak back there the other 10%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombstone56 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 THE ONLY TE CARRYING FIRST RDGRADE IS OLSEN ,,WE HAVE OTHER PRIORITIES BUT I THINK THATS A LONG SHOT,,,,ZACH MILLER IS DROPPING BECAUSE HES SLOW,, BEN PATRICK ,SPAETH , MILLER, ARE OK BUT NOTHING MORE THAN WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY,, CIESLAK IS MOVING TO FB-HBACK FULLTIME I THINK.. SO STILL A SLOT ,,,, LONG SHOT IS THE MURPHY KID ,BUT A KID FROM THE WAC,, KEVIN BOSS HAS SOME HISTORY WITH THE BILLS,, NEW OL ASST... LIKELY A 5-6 ROUND PICK .. I LIKE SPAETH HES LIKE METZALARRS,, NOT PRETTY ,,NOT FAST BUT GREAT HANDS HUGE TARGET CAUGHT ANYTHING THROWN IN HIS ZIP CODE ,,,, TICK TICK TICK....DRAFT DAYS SOON!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I'd be scared to death if Ceislak ended up as our FB. He'd be destoyed at the point of attack. Sure he lined up there a little last year but full time!? Please.......... It is a possibility (though I think it is a remote one) we draft a TE on day 1. I would put it at about the chance we actually go with an offense which tends to use 3 WRs rather than 2 WRs and a TE. Possible but a remote possibility. I think Cieslak fits in well in this structure of limited TE usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I think our 1st 3 picks go like this in no particular order, depending on who falls into our lap... (RB, LB, CB/LB) RB is 100% sure (Lynch, Bush), LB is 100% sure (P Willis, Posluzny), and our 3rd pick, depending on best available athlete, we take another LB or CB I can also see us packaging both our 3rds and a 6th to move back into the 2nd rd and pick up a guy marv and dj like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. I hope we do. This is actually my top contender for the "what the eff.... " award. Of all the first round picks Marv might make that would send the board into a group seizure like he did with the Whitner pick last year, taking a TE in the first is the most likely. Seriously though, I really do think we need a good TE and I just am not cofident in the people we have on the roster now. That screw up by Royal in failing to tap his feet before he went out of the endzone against the Titans was a true "Ronnie Harmon" moment. He had a number of drops throughout the year that convinced me that we need a TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndirish1978 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. Please, stop the drugs, seriously Crack is Wack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 I could see us picking up Olsen from Miami if we can't find a partner to trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
generaLee83 Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Other than Robert Royal, we have mediocre TE. Everett has shown nothing. I would keep Cieslak as #3, but we need another TE since we play alot of two TE formations. Neufeld sucks. I think Zach Miller could be available in the 3rd. You're insane, to think that this team has a TE need that is big enough to merit a first day pick is just plain crazy. Alot of two TE formations? I saw more of the 3 and 4 WR sets towards the end of last season. Pure insanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UHSLA Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 Cieslak will get cut again this year, along with Everett. We'll draft a TE on day 2. We'll keep 4 tight ends - Royal, Neufeld, draft pick, Murphy and will not keep a true fullback on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts