jahnyc Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Jay Glazer reported on the CBS pre-game show that the Bills are shopping Clements before the trading deadline. He also noted that Tampa Bay was willing to trade a number of veteran players, including Booger McFarland (DT). I recall that there were reports that the Bills agreed with Clements that they would not put the franchise tag on him again next year, which means this would be the last chance to get some value in return for Clements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Jay Glazer reported on the CBS pre-game show that the Bills are shopping Clements before the trading deadline. He also noted that Tampa Bay was willing to trade a number of veteran players, including Booger McFarland (DT). I recall that there were reports that the Bills agreed with Clements that they would not put the franchise tag on him again next year, which means this would be the last chance to get some value in return for Clements. 804408[/snapback] Wow. That could be one of the best possible situations for the Bills. For one, like you said we can get something for him now instead of him walking next year for nothing, and two because he's not doing much this year anyway. Trade deadline is week 6 right? Anyone know when this would have to be done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Boogar Mcfarland is a solid player- I would strongly consider that trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ganesh Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Trade deadline is week 6 right? Anyone know when this would have to be done? 804410[/snapback] Trade deadline is this Tuesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Git 'er done Marv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Git 'er done Marv. 804422[/snapback] It does sound like a reasonable trade. Unless McFarland is on his last legs, this trade sound really good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Oct. 15, 2006 - 12:32 p.m. ET The Bucs are reportedly dangling DT Anthony McFarland in trade talks. Injured CB Brian Kelly is also available, according to FoxSports.com's Jay Glazer. Tampa is said to be looking for a first-day pick in exchange for McFarland, which might be asking too much for the underachiever. How about Brian Kelly and Booger for Clements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Oct. 15, 2006 - 12:32 p.m. ET How about Brian Kelly and Booger for Clements? 804428[/snapback] That might be asking a bit too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 and then someone on Fox said that Clements will be one of the best if not the best free agent out their if the Bills dont sign him ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Trade deadline is this Tuesday. 804419[/snapback] Don't know how long these talks have been happening, but if this is a new thing it will be tough for Tampa to work out a long term contract with Clements in the next 2 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Don't know how long these talks have been happening, but if this is a new thing it will be tough for Tampa to work out a long term contract with Clements in the next 2 days. 804439[/snapback] Who knows if Clements even wants to go to Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Trooth Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 McFarland? 20 career sacks? In his seventh season? Soon to be 29? He's missed 21 out of 100 regular season games. Anyone want a guy that plays 1 out of every 5 games? Someone, anyone, I need help... please explain to me why this slob makes the bills a better team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jahnyc Posted October 15, 2006 Author Share Posted October 15, 2006 There is no linkage between the Bills checking interest in Clements and Tampa Bay's willingness to trade some of their veterans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 and then someone on Fox said that Clements will be one of the best if not the best free agent out their if the Bills dont sign him ... 804432[/snapback] How do you type with Nate's d*ck in your mouth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 McFarland? 20 career sacks? In his seventh season? Soon to be 29? He's missed 21 out of 100 regular season games. Anyone want a guy that plays 1 out of every 5 games? Someone, anyone, I need help... please explain to me why this slob makes the bills a better team? 805209[/snapback] Nice math, genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 McFarland sucks and he is not nearly worth as much as Clements straight up. The problem is we dont have any DT's and we will lose Clements anyways.... so does that overrule everything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 How do you type with Nate's d*ck in your mouth? 805220[/snapback] in his hand.... in his hand..... i mean if your going to dis someone....make some sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 McFarland? 20 career sacks? In his seventh season? Soon to be 29? He's missed 21 out of 100 regular season games. Anyone want a guy that plays 1 out of every 5 games? Someone, anyone, I need help... please explain to me why this slob makes the bills a better team? 805209[/snapback] 1. Plugs the middle of the field 2. Improve run defense 3. Disrupts the QB 4. Relatively young Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 McFarland sucks and he is not nearly worth as much as Clements straight up. The problem is we dont have any DT's and we will lose Clements anyways.... so does that overrule everything? 805226[/snapback] Yeah, Clements sure looked like an All-Pro corner today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACKMARINO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Git 'er done Marv. 804422[/snapback] i agree! - this could be the only way we get value from Nate this year. He certainly isnt giving us much value on the field and we can't tag him and trade him in the off-season. might as well get something for him. anyways, youboty should be ready sometime soon too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 i agree! - this could be the only way we get value from Nate this year. He certainly isnt giving us much value on the field and we can't tag him and trade him in the off-season. might as well get something for him. anyways, youboty should be ready sometime soon too. 805261[/snapback] With McFarland, we wouldn't need an "All-Pro" like Nate at CB. I say pull the trigger on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Yeah, Clements sure looked like an All-Pro corner today. 805238[/snapback] Yes and Im sure McFarland looked much better when they surrender 100 yards rushing to the Ravens and Panthers, 150 against the Saints, and 306 yards in rushing alone to the Falcons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Yeah, Clements sure looked like an All-Pro corner today. 805238[/snapback] Dude what are you talking about? Clements only got beat once today and it was a definate push-off ... McGee is who got torched today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Yes and Im sure McFarland looked much better when they surrender 100 yards rushing to the Ravens and Panthers, 150 against the Saints, and 306 yards in rushing alone to the Falcons. 805264[/snapback] Who does he have to help him? It's a damn mess down in Tampa Bay. And BTW, they didn't look too bad vs. Cincinnati today. Surrendering only 14 points to one of the most prolific offenses in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 How do you type with Nate's d*ck in your mouth? 805220[/snapback] The same way you type with your foot consistantly in your mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Dude what are you talking about? Clements only got beat once today and it was a definate push-off ... McGee is who got torched today 805265[/snapback] So we don't put our "All-Pro" CB on Detroit's best WR? Definitely says something about what the coaching staff thinks of him and his "abilities". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 The same way you type with your foot consistantly in your mouth. 805271[/snapback] NOOOOOOO you can still type with sh-- in your mouth....... Just ask JSP's sister OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO damn im good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 So we don't put our "All-Pro" CB on Detroit's best WR? Definitely says something about what the coaching staff thinks of him and his "abilities". 805281[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 805284[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBTG81 Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 NOOOOOOO you can still type with sh-- in your mouth.......Just ask JSP's sister OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO damn im good 805283[/snapback] I'm guessing a suspension will be coming... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 So we don't put our "All-Pro" CB on Detroit's best WR? Definitely says something about what the coaching staff thinks of him and his "abilities". 805281[/snapback] This shows your lack of football knowledge ... a CB plays his side. RARELY does a CB have an assignment to a particular receiver. If you noticed Clements did cover Williams a few plays. When he was on his side. Heck even little kids who play Madden know this ... default is your CB plays a side and if you want you can switch up and give him a particular assignment towards a receiver. But either way stop saying Clements got torched because your making yourself look like a tard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 This shows your lack of football knowledge ... a CB plays his side. RARELY does a CB have an assignment to a particular receiver. If you noticed Clements did cover Williams a few plays. When he was on his side. Heck even little kids who play Madden know this ... default is your CB plays a side and if you want you can switch up and give him a particular assignment towards a receiver. But either way stop saying Clements got torched because your making yourself look like a tard. 805295[/snapback] Quick question. Is Clements worth the 7.2M he is getting paid, which is what the thread is about. Factor in all his performances thus far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 NOOOOOOO you can still type with sh-- in your mouth.......Just ask JSP's sister OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO damn im good 805283[/snapback] your an !@#$. Why the hell do you need to bring family into this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 your an !@#$. Why the hell do you need to bring family into this? 805312[/snapback] cuz saying "that girl next door" doesnt pack as much punch man....cmon now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Quick question. Is Clements worth the 7.2M he is getting paid, which is what the thread is about. Factor in all his performances thus far. 805302[/snapback] It would depend on the situation ... in our situation - YES! We keep giving up good players because we dont want to pay them and think we can pick up a couple other players for the same ammount of money we could pay the one. Thus Winfield and Pat Washington is gone. Pat Washington would do wonders for our run defense right now huh???? Pay the darn player and you still have 12 million to do with how you please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 It would depend on the situation ... in our situation - YES! We keep giving up good players because we dont want to pay them and think we can pick up a couple other players for the same ammount of money we could pay the one. Thus Winfield and Pat Washington is gone. Pat Washington would do wonders for our run defense right now huh???? Pay the darn player and you still have 12 million to do with how you please. 805320[/snapback] Yes Pat Washingtion would look good in our run defense... wait who's Pat Washington... Is that a combo of MT TED and BIG PAT... damn that dude would look good in our defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACKMARINO Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Pat Washington would do wonders for our run defense right now huh???? Pay the darn player and you still have 12 million to do with how you please. 805320[/snapback] who is pat washington? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patience Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 It would depend on the situation ... in our situation - YES! We keep giving up good players because we dont want to pay them and think we can pick up a couple other players for the same ammount of money we could pay the one. Thus Winfield and Pat Washington is gone. Pat Washington would do wonders for our run defense right now huh???? Pay the darn player and you still have 12 million to do with how you please. 805320[/snapback] Pat doesn't / didn't fit our system. If you could build a good pass rush, you won't need to have as good CB's. Imagine if we got McFarland, who has experience in our D, paired with Tripplett. Have Schobel on the outside, and draft Gaines Adams in the Draft. Judging by our performance today, we'll be in a prime spot to pick him. Can you imagine that pass rush we could generate? We could have Chris Watson and Darryl Porter back there, and still be successful. We know this team isn't going anywhere this year, but if we can build up the trenches now, it will benefit us in the long run. That's why I'm in favor of this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Yes Pat Washingtion would look good in our run defense... wait who's Pat Washington... Is that a combo of MT TED and BIG PAT... damn that dude would look good in our defense 805326[/snapback] who is pat washington? 805327[/snapback] AHAHAHA I guess I had Ted Washington and Pat Williams both on the mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 Pat doesn't / didn't fit our system. If you could build a good pass rush, you won't need to have as good CB's. Imagine if we got McFarland, who has experience in our D, paired with Tripplett. Have Schobel on the outside, and draft Gaines Adams in the Draft. Judging by our performance today, we'll be in a prime spot to pick him. Can you imagine that pass rush we could generate? We could have Chris Watson and Darryl Porter back there, and still be successful. We know this team isn't going anywhere this year, but if we can build up the trenches now, it will benefit us in the long run. That's why I'm in favor of this trade. 805331[/snapback] Your posts are getting worse and worse. Every team in the NFL including the Bills know that Clements is worth more than mcFarland. There is a reason why Tampa is putting him on the trading block. He is injured often and gets very few sacks (ie: no pressure on the qb) ... the Bucs would have to include another player or a draft pick for us to give up Clements. Thus the trade does not make sense for us. What you dont understand is that Clements has a lot of value in this league and once he is a free agents MULTIPLE teams will be offering him good money for hiss services. Fox pre-game said as much in the pregame saying he will be probably the best Free Agent on the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts