jms62 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 The Bills are getting weaker instead of stronger during the free agency period!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 OMFGLOLLOLLLOL!!!#!@11!!!1!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 what is with all the polls with the new kids on the block ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Its not just the polls, but this is...what...the 1000th time this question has been posed? Does it deserve a new thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Its not just the polls, but this is...what...the 1000th time this question has been posed? Does it deserve a new thread? 648264[/snapback] Maybe it's because of Ritalin, and its after-effects through the years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Got no idea. I'll get back to you in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinandjokin Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I would say they are weaker because Rusty Jones left for Chitown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 impossible to tell, because we don't know if they're better at qb. if they are, then they're a better team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I'm starting " Are the Bills Stronger Now ? " poll after the Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloboyinATL Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I'm starting " Are the Bills Stronger Now ? " poll after the Draft. 648313[/snapback] No kidding. The off season is not over yet. We will not know how we did until after the draft and the end of free agency. We have to look at the whole picture because these 2 things go hand in hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Silly question. Of course we are. We let a number of people go and we haven't brought a lot of people in. However we now have load of money and in interesting draft. What we are at this moment is meaningless. Let's see where we are at the beginning of preseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBilliever Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I think with the acquisition of Triplett and Royal we have become much stronger in two key areas. I guarantee Triplett will pick up his game, and Royal will be critical on the line, he seems incredibly psyched to be in a Bills uniform. This, being about my 5th post on this topic, will change once A.J. Hawk is picked up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 All right, I'll bite: QB: Losman, Holcomb, Matthews vs. Losman, Holcomb Nall Verdict + RB: unchanged WR: Evans, Moulds, Reed, Parrish vs Evans, David, Reed, Parrish Verdict - TE: Campbell, Euhus vs. Everett, Royal, Euhus Verdict + OL: Gandy, Anderson, Teague, Villarreal, Williams vs. Gandy, Preston, Fowler, Villarreal, Peters. Verdict + DL: Shobel, Adams, Anderson, Kelsay vs. Schobel, Tripplett, Anderson, Kelsay Verdict = LB: Posey, Fletcher, Haggan vs. Posey, Fletcher, Spikes + CB: Clements, McGee vs. Clements, McGee Verdict + (experience) S: Milloy, Vincent vs. Bowens, Vincent Verdict - K/P = So, on the whole, looks like a wash. Until you get to better coaching, and the fact that we haven't drafted yet. We're also in much better salary cap position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBilliever Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 It's Crowell, not Haggans, and I find Parrish, Reed to be a better fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 we won't know if they are better or not because we have no way of telling which, and what percentage of young guys will begin to "come into their own" and which will fail to show improvement. The possibilities are really limitless. For example, if the "light turned on" this season for JP, Preston, and Everett, we'd certainly be a lot better than if the pendulum swings the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 addition by subtraction in my eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 I would say they are weaker because Rusty Jones left for Chitown. 648305[/snapback] Ummm, he left for Chitown before the 2005 season. That's when Mularkey put "his guy" in. You know, the one who decided that McGahee had to play at a much heavier weight.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Ummm, he left for Chitown before the 2005 season. That's when Mularkey put "his guy" in. You know, the one who decided that McGahee had to play at a much heavier weight.... 648660[/snapback] ...and the same one who has since gone bye-bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 ...and the same one who has since gone bye-bye. 648664[/snapback] replaced by Rusty's 2nd...I'd say that was an improvement...unless he has McGahee reporting at 250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrate Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 Permission to start a poll that says Do You Like Polls? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crackur Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 It's Crowell, not Haggans, and I find Parrish, Reed to be a better fit 648369[/snapback] crowell is still here he is talking about who we lost...........we lost haggan.....a special teamer or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 crowell is still here he is talking about who we lost...........we lost haggan.....a special teamer or something 648975[/snapback] I'm pretty sure we re-signed Haggan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 The reason these idiotic polls stay alive is because idiotic people actually respond to them with the exact same idiotic thing they put into the last identical idiotic poll. Did something change because it was said again for the 957th time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 The reason these idiotic polls stay alive is because idiotic people actually respond to them with the exact same idiotic thing they put into the last identical idiotic poll. Did something change because it was said again for the 957th time? 648986[/snapback] Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of BiB Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. 649012[/snapback] It's also called "Read". At least the first page, at least. Before one runs their mouth. That said, you also know I'm an ass, don't really care, and make my comments because I'm very cynical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 It's also called "Read". At least the first page, at least. Before one runs their mouth. That said, you also know I'm an ass, don't really care, and make my comments because I'm very cynical. 649018[/snapback] Agreed. Both parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Trouble is, somebody relatively new to TSW doesn't *know* there have been 956 previous threads. (And not to pick solely on the newbies, some long-time regulars could learn to use the "search" function a little more often themselves.) I think we've been more proactive lately in merging threads, like the three different Sam-Adams-to-Cincy ones I jammed together last night. Still a work in progress, though... and one not helped by the kind of crap that inundated the board yesterday afternoon. But hey, glad everyone had fun. 649012[/snapback] I was quite the merge monster, then gave up this weekend. Though I did merge the half dozen or so "Clayton/ESPN/ESPN Radio/Philly Radio Reports Moulds to Texans" threads...oh, and the "thanks eric" thread yesterday with the one that was started back when there were a half dozen or so "Clayton/ESPN/ESPN Radio Reports Moulds to be cut any second now" threads... As far as the "crap" goes, or at least my contribution to it, I've just had trouble figuring out which of the 100 or so threads on a subject is the one to which I should add my opinion ...so why not put the opinion in all of them?...I did limit it to stuff on the first page and it did work in some respects, because I did get a serious response to one of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts