Jump to content

Its Official


Recommended Posts

That is such B.S. Compare what the Broncos received last year, and who they lost, to this single 7th round pick, and who we lost. The NFL won't reveal their secret formula. You tell me...is there bias in the NFL offices?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is such B.S. Compare what the Broncos received last year, and who they lost, to this single 7th round pick, and who we lost. The NFL won't reveal their secret formula. You tell me...is there bias in the NFL offices?

643737[/snapback]

 

Could you tell us what happened with Denver last season?

I am NOT arguing the point that you make mind you....I would merely like to read what you are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buffalo would have gotten more if it weren't for a few factors

 

1. Pat Williams making the pro bowl for Minnesota

 

2. Jonas Jennings being able to play a full season for SF

 

3. Kelly Holcomb, and Bennie Anderson not starting a bunch of Games for us

 

The league doesn't care if the player is good for the team they played for originally or what those teams think of the player, its what the player does in their first year with the new team and what kind of deal they sign that determines what the other team gets

 

We should get atleast a second just for having Bennie on the roster for the full season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't say that I'm surprised. Jonas and his injuries come back to haunt us even after we part ways. This also raises one more reason we should have started JP as much as possible last year. I won't even get into Anderson.

 

Between Jonas's continued shortcomings and Holcombs number of starts and playing time, I'm surprised we got any compensatory picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like that guy on the KFFL board nailed it, at least from the Bills' perspective.

643758[/snapback]

I wish I knew what other picks were awareded. As it might help us get rid of Moulds if a team, like Houston, did end up with another 3rd or 4th. If so it could mean they'd be more willing to part with their 4th in order to acquire Moulds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you tell us what happened with Denver last season?

  I am NOT arguing the point that you make mind you....I would merely like to read what you are talking about.

643750[/snapback]

 

Denver

Lost: Reggie Hayward, Kenoy Kennedy, Donnie Spragan

Signed: Stephen Alexander, Keith Burns

 

Denver lost 3 signed 2, difference of one which is the 4th round they received.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like that guy on the KFFL board nailed it, at least from the Bills' perspective.

643758[/snapback]

 

Yeah, that guy's pretty sharp.

 

It still burns me that signing Bennie Anderson likely cost us a third or a fourth round comp pick this year. TD really should have factored that into his decision after we lost JJ and PW to big $$$ deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.billsdaily.com/news/index.shtml#032706

 

 

Bills Get Comp Pick: The Bills were awarded a compensatory pick in this year's draft by the league today. They will get an extra 7th round pick, the 248th overall pick in the draft. The Bills are one of 19 teams to get a comp pick and are one of only three teams to get one without having a net loss in free agency last year. The Bills at this point now have nine picks in the upcoming draft.

 

I wonder who we will use it on? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ravens | Team receives four comp picks

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:06:31 -0800

 

The Baltimore Ravens received four compensatory pick in the 2006 NFL Draft. The picks are No. 35 in the fourth round or No. 132 overall, No. 34 in the fourth round or No. 166 overall, No. 34 in the sixth round or No. 203 overall and No. 39 in the sixth round or No. 208 overall.

 

 

So, the Ravens get a higher pick for losing Bennie Anderson than we get because we signed him. Go figure. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...