CentralVaBills Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 who might play this week, it would be Roscoe Parrish. He could actually be a difference maker. Yeah, I'm sure the Jets are shaking in their shoes for either Holcomb or Losman. Yeah Right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 The Jets should be shaking in their boots regardless. Giving them something extra to think about assures a win for the Bills even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 who might play this week, it would be Roscoe Parrish. He could actually be a difference maker. Yeah, I'm sure the Jets are shaking in their shoes for either Holcomb or Losman. Yeah Right. 474413[/snapback] I really don't care, but personally, I'm hoping its more about getting the Buffalo media all POed! If it is, then more power to them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navy Chief Navy Pride Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 Herm said today that they are prepping for both JP and Holcomb. Herm needs to be prepping on who on his staff he will blame this loss on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 Who gives a fug what he does or say? Mularkey could come out and Riverdance for 5 minutes, turn around and moon the press gallery, and then go tongue kiss Ralph Wilson but as long as we win on Sunday, who cares. The starting QB will be the one I see line up behind center and gnashing my teeth over not being told in advance who it will be is a waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 Who gives a fug what he does or say? Mularkey could come out and Riverdance for 5 minutes, turn around and moon the press gallery, and then go tongue kiss Ralph Wilson but as long as we win on Sunday, who cares. The starting QB will be the one I see line up behind center and gnashing my teeth over not being told in advance who it will be is a waste of time. 474431[/snapback] and then go tongue kiss Ralph Wilson but as long as we win on Sunday, who cares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralVaBills Posted October 12, 2005 Author Share Posted October 12, 2005 Who gives a fug what he does or say? Mularkey could come out and Riverdance for 5 minutes, turn around and moon the press gallery, and then go tongue kiss Ralph Wilson but as long as we win on Sunday, who cares. The starting QB will be the one I see line up behind center and gnashing my teeth over not being told in advance who it will be is a waste of time. 474431[/snapback] Because it's flat out stupid. No sh--, who gives a fug if they say it or not. However, I'm seriously starting to think we have a bunch of idiots all over One Bills Drive. Do they really think they are being smart by hiding who is playing? Another example of mental "trick plays" that are flat out stupid. We can't just line up and play football, but we have to "trick" everyone. Whether it's on the field or now our newest weapon......mind games. We are always relying on cute-sie horseshit. Everyone knows it will be Holcomb at QB. Yet, when there is one guy who could make a difference on the field (Parrish), the cat is out immediately. Seriously, what do the Jets prepare for? Losman, a QB who sucks right now (not saying he always will).......or Holcomb, a pocket guy who has potential to carry a team once every 10 games or so. Neither are scary. Gimmie a good, solid gameplan. Involve Willis, keep Peters at TE, and get Lee Evans off. Maybe debut Roscoe on a key 3rd down slot play. Don't tell me, part of our plan to beat the Jets is hiding which below average QB we are going to start. I don't think our disount version of Michael Vick and Matt Schaub are scaring anyone. Whether they prepare for them or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 Gimmie a good, solid gameplan. Involve Willis, keep Peters at TE, and get Lee Evans off. Maybe debut Roscoe on a key 3rd down slot play. 474440[/snapback] As long as they do this: "Gimmie a good, solid gameplan. Involve Willis, keep Peters at TE, and get Lee Evans off. Maybe debut Roscoe on a key 3rd down slot play. ...what the difference what they say about who starts at QB? Do you think MM is taking time away from the game plan to sculpt his QB answers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralVaBills Posted October 12, 2005 Author Share Posted October 12, 2005 As long as they do this: "Gimmie a good, solid gameplan. Involve Willis, keep Peters at TE, and get Lee Evans off. Maybe debut Roscoe on a key 3rd down slot play. ...what the difference what they say about who starts at QB? Do you think MM is taking time away from the game plan to sculpt his QB answers? 474443[/snapback] AGAIN, it makes no difference. However, why? My problem with it is simple. Is he fugging with the media? If so, OK. Maybe a little bit of spite. I kinda like that. BUT, if he really thinks this gives the Bills an edge.....well, he's an idiot. I'm hoping he's not an idiot. But more and more, it's harder to trust all of these Pittsburgh re-treads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 12, 2005 Share Posted October 12, 2005 AGAIN, it makes no difference. However, why? My problem with it is simple. Is he fugging with the media? If so, OK. Maybe a little bit of spite. I kinda like that. BUT, if he really thinks this gives the Bills an edge.....well, he's an idiot. I'm hoping he's not an idiot. But more and more, it's harder to trust all of these Pittsburgh re-treads. 474449[/snapback] If he were an idiot, we'd have been 4-12 last year....MM is a pretty good coach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralVaBills Posted October 12, 2005 Author Share Posted October 12, 2005 If he were an idiot, we'd have been 4-12 last year....MM is a pretty good coach 474453[/snapback] No, instead we were 9-7 because we played a putrid schedule down the stretch, that pretty much masked all that was wrong with this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LabattBlue Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 No, instead we were 9-7 because we played a putrid schedule down the stretch, that pretty much masked all that was wrong with this team. 474454[/snapback] This is why I am very interested in the 2nd half of this years schedule. It is loaded with quality opponents and I want to see how the Bills fare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 No, instead we were 9-7 because we played a putrid schedule down the stretch, that pretty much masked all that was wrong with this team. 474454[/snapback] So why didnt we end up being worse than those teams then....we obviously did quite a few things right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDH Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 No, instead we were 9-7 because we played a putrid schedule down the stretch, that pretty much masked all that was wrong with this team. 474454[/snapback] This isn't college football. If a team doesn't show up ready to play on Sunday they'll get beaten no matter who the opponent is. The “easy” schedule thing just doesn’t fly in the NFL. Bad teams don’t win consistently, even against other bad teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stussy109 Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 not shaking, but both are COMPLETELY different QB's, it does affect one's game plan heading into the game. In theory if you have to game polan for both QB's, you can't dedicate as much time to any one approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadBuffaloDisease Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 Put the blame where it belongs: on Bill Belichick. He's the one who started the whole playing coy with injuries crap. And now he complaining about other teams doing it. Hypocrite! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 Put the blame where it belongs: on Bill Belichick. He's the one who started the whole playing coy with injuries crap. And now he complaining about other teams doing it. Hypocrite! 474606[/snapback] Be like Bill! PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 No stupid penalties, no dropped balls, no fumbles, and perfect tackling and we win! Really, is it that hard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 It gets better. I'm looking at this week's press release right now. Specifically, the depth chart on page 13. Even more specifically, the big empty blank space next to the spot marked QB, where the names Losman, Holcomb, and Matthews used to be. We don't even have a McGahee/Henry-style "1a and 1b" here - according to this, we have no quarterbacks on the roster. I'm sure somebody will either write a rant for the News or vent on the local radio station about this, if they haven't already. As for me, I think it's flippin' hysterical. (Just so long as the folks over at One Bills Drive take time out from playing "Top THAT!!!" with the media to craft some semblance of a gameplan.... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 13, 2005 Share Posted October 13, 2005 Is MM that secure that he's inviting open warefare with the WNY media? TD seemed to have a belly full of it a couple of years back. To me this is just another sign of mis-managment. By the way. Nice throwbacks. Too bad we don't have even THAT to look forward to anymore this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts