Nihilarian Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago What a lot of Bills fans may or may not know is in the late 80s, early 90's the Bills ran more than they threw it. Even though it was called the K-gun offense. Then it developed into Kelly calling his own plays and the "hurry up" offense. even in that 1990 highest scoring offense in the NFL they still ran it more 425 to 479. Those receivers in 1990 were Reed, Lofton, Thurman Thomas, Keith McKeller, Don Smith, Don Beebe. Steve Tasker even had 2 targets for 2 receptions for 44 yards 2 Quote
Nephilim17 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Did the OP actually watch more than the first minute or two of the video? The video does NOT advocate for passing all the time. In fact, here is a screen shot of what are almost the last words of the video, with captions, of course. Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, ChronicAndKnuckles said: I made a thread about Davis coming back. I truthfully believe he will make a difference. Get some of that early 2020s swagger going again. Hopefully he put his drop issues behind him. Yeah, I think he's a definitive upgrade from a number of the guys we have in the core. Which says how bad of a shape we're in with the WR room. But again, my hope was that he'd be coming in to a healthy pass catching room and providing more to it. Kincaid is far and away our top guy at getting open and making plays these days. Davis coming in and Kincaid coming out doesn't make us better in my eyes. Would love to be wrong though. Quote
Herc11 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Nihilarian said: What a lot of Bills fans may or may not know is in the late 80s, early 90's the Bills ran more than they threw it. Even though it was called the K-gun offense. Then it developed into Kelly calling his own plays and the "hurry up" offense. even in that 1990 highest scoring offense in the NFL they still ran it more 425 to 479. Those receivers in 1990 were Reed, Lofton, Thurman Thomas, Keith McKeller, Don Smith, Don Beebe. Steve Tasker even had 2 targets for 2 receptions for 44 yards Pre-2000's can't really be compared because the rules were not as offense friendly. Defense won championships and run first, ball control offenses prevailed. Post-2000 the league became more pass oriented as rule changes began favoring passing and scoring. Cook has been phenomenal and should be a focal point of this offense. However, I don't believe that's why our offense is so run heavy focused. If the reason was Cook, he'd be getting the ball 20-25 times a games. I believe McDermott is trying to cover for his defense by having a run first, ball control offense. Even when we pass, it's quick hitting bubble screens, short passes that are an extension of the run game. McDermott does not want a quick strike offense that is constantly putting the defense back on the field because he knows they can't hold the best teams, ie: 13 seconds, etc... Edited 4 hours ago by Herc11 1 1 Quote
reddogblitz Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Interesting. The one thing he said that I agreed with most is maybe defenses shouldn't substitute as much. Play your best guys. Quote
Billzgobowlin Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I say change the game to what works. The Carolina game was a perfect game to run. Longterm in a game running is better as you go along because it wears down the LBs and the Dline. Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) The problem with the offense is not the run-pass ratio. It's that they're below average when they throw the ball. Edited 2 hours ago by Sierra Foothills Quote
Chaos Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) The team is illogically built. No MVP level QB in the last 30 years has had a team focus on building a running attack as their primary offense. If they are doing that this season, it is because the OC does not know how to scheme this group of receivers effectively. Is it because the receivers suck or the OC sucks, I don't know. But taking a team that was pitching perfect playoff games and saying "we need to slow this down and make this QB a game manager" is on the list of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen from a football team. Edited 2 hours ago by Chaos 1 Quote
Mike R Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The Bills have a good running game no doubt. Their offensive line is good, not great. Their running back is very good. Good things happen when you can run the ball and you usually win. So why not run? Teams study game film and see tendencies and figure out how to stop you. All NFL teams have figured out if you stack the box you can stop the Bills run game. That’s when you take advantage of defenses cheating up to stop the run. The problem is the Bills pass game has turned to crap and is unrecognizable. To stubbornly run into an eight man box with the safety cheating up is not going to work. The Bills offensive line cannot just impose their will against teams prepared for them. We saw that last week and against good defenses it’s not going to work. Miami doesn’t even have a good defense and all the running into a brick wall did was set up difficult 3rd downs. Until the Bills get their pass game in order they are going nowhere. They refuse to throw to the outside or deep. Sideline screens/laterals are no longer working as teams recognize that play. 8 man boxes and the safeties moving up have congested the middle of the field in the short to intermediate range and no one is open. That’s the only place the Bills throw to. Miami played a lot of zone and just waited for the receivers to go where they always do and were easily stopped until garbage time when they loosened up. Miami has one of the worst secondary’s in the league fielding no name 3rd stringers who shut down Josh Allen and the Bills. The Bills were scoreless into the 4th quarter. The Bills have serious problems and if exposed again against Tampa their season is finished. Quote
Matt_In_NH Posted 25 minutes ago Posted 25 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Sierra Foothills said: The problem with the offense is not the run-pass ratio. It's that they're below average when they throw the ball. In what metrics? Don’t think that is true for yards per attempt. Td percentage, int percentage. Edited 24 minutes ago by Matt_In_NH Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.