11/9/25 GAMEDAY Bills at Dolphins 1st Half Game Thread

[Buffalo716]

8 minutes ago, billsfanfrom83 said:

Daball gets more credit for Allen then mcd but I think it was Allen's desire to keep improving himself into the player he has become mcd has little to do with it that's just my opinion I wasn't there so I don't know the real reasons for Allen's rise

Daboll couldn't even keep Daniel Jones on track for 4 years 

 

Playing better in Indianapolis than he ever did

 

I think McDermott has much more impact on this franchise

8 minutes ago, BillsFan692 said:

The bills haven't been developing josh allen they've been destroying him ever since dabs left. Sorry didnt bother to read anything else you had to say because it was awful.

McDermott is also coaching for his Job, pal. Believe that.

Josh Allen won the NFL MVP last year and cut his turnovers in half by three times lol

 

If you don't think that they're still trying to develop Josh Allen I don't know what to tell you 

 

I've been the first one to say here for years Josh is not a finished product and he still has a lot of room to grow.. he still has lots of room to grow he's nowhere near as pristine as a 30-year-old Tom Brady

Edited 2 hours ago by Buffalo716

[Man with No Name]

any analysis on the INT to knox? this is one of those plays that looks so bad, you have to assume allen or knox didn't know where knox was supposed to be. felt like one of those classic Gabe Davis INTs. 

[JohninMinn.]

I just got here. How is Quinn doing?

[CirclnWagons]

Leave the entire staff and Beane in south beach. The organization is completely content depending on Josh to do absolutely everything and refuse to get him any help. Let him call plays and run practice too. We can find plenty of guys to wear bills gear and walk the sidelines clapping for pennys on the dollar of what we’re paying mcD and staff 

[Scott7975]

56 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

Cook 13 carries for 53 yards...what is up with Joe Brady?

 

A lot of his carries were stuffed or only a couple yards and that put us behind the sticks. We don't have the horses to catchup when behind the sticks. Been trying to tell people who seem to think Cook can't be stopped or we dont need a receiver or think our offense is secretly elite that eventually someone will stop our run game and this would happen. 

We have nothing but a bunch of roleplayers.  Sure Cook is good but can be stopped. Shakir is our only trusted receiver so he can be stopped. Kincaid is good but gets hurt or has brainfarts and can also be stopped. There is no true receiver that defenses worry about on this team.  People expect us to continue on 10+ play drives that require perfection all game every game. We throw the ball behind the LOS like 10 times a game. Chunk plays are a necessity in the NFL. Having a strong pass game is a necessity in the NFL.  Half of Cook is actually the oline being that good schematically, but eventually coordinators figure out how to stop that schematically.  It was never a winning formula to be one dimensional. If you are going to be one dimensional then its better that you are one dimensional passing.

Edited 1 hour ago by Scott7975

[Nihilarian]

1 minute ago, Scott7975 said:

 

A lot of his carries were stuffed or only a couple yards and that put us behind the sticks. We don't have the horses to catchup when behind the sticks. Been trying to tell people who seem to think Cook can't be stopped or we dont need a receiver or think our offense is secretly elite that eventually someone will stop our run game and this would happen. 

We have nothing but a bunch of roleplayers.  Sure Cook is good but can be stopped. Shakir is our only trusted receiver so he can be stopped. Kincaid is good but gets hurt or has brainfarts and can also be stopped. There is no true receiver that defenses worry about on this team.  People expect us to continue on 10+ play drives that require perfection all game every game. Chunk plays are a necessity in the NFL. Having a strong pass game is a necessity in the NFL.  Half of Cook is actually the oline being that good schematically, but eventually coordinators figure out how to stop that schematically.  It was never a winning formula to be one dimensional. If you are going to be one dimensional then its better that you are one dimensional passing.

Well Brady finally had Cook involved in the pass game with 5 targets, 5 catches for 24 yards.  but it was Ty Johnson who had 2 catches for 24 yards.

 

I still say Joe Brady isn't setting up his passing scheme properly and against a team that was 24th in defense it should have been an easy win. 

[Scott7975]

4 minutes ago, Nihilarian said:

Well Brady finally had Cook involved in the pass game with 5 targets, 5 catches for 24 yards.  but it was Ty Johnson who had 2 catches for 24 yards.

 

I still say Joe Brady isn't setting up his passing scheme properly and against a team that was 24th in defense it should have been an easy win. 

im not excusing Brady but not having Cook run more wasn’t the problem. The true problem is we have no talent. Second problem is the pass game scheme is mostly LOS passes. This is the offense McD has wanted since coming here so it might not even be totally on Brady.