JDHillFan Posted September 16 Posted September 16 23 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: And what's more troubling: a lot of Trump fans (including obviously many here) Can you share any posts agreeing with Bondi on this matter? You have stated “many here”. Should be easy. 1 2
Roundybout Posted September 16 Posted September 16 36 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I think they are reacting politically. Fortunately we have separation of powers and I doubt anything unconstitutional will stand. That doesn't mean I "wish I voted for Kamala." Good take!!
nedboy7 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 (edited) “You have a lot of hate in your heart,” Trump told an ABC reporter in response to a question about Attorney General Pam Bondi’s assertion this week that “hate speech” could be treated as a crime. “Maybe they’ll have to go after you.” This is not really America anymore right? Edited September 16 by nedboy7
JFKjr Posted September 16 Posted September 16 6 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: “You have a lot of hate in your heart,” Trump told an ABC reporter in response to a question about Attorney General Pam Bondi’s assertion this week that “hate speech” could be treated as a crime. “Maybe they’ll have to go after you.” This is not really America anymore right? I thought you guys wanted something new.
nedboy7 Posted September 16 Posted September 16 (edited) 25 minutes ago, JFKjr said: I thought you guys wanted something new. Whataboutism. one is a dummies opinion. the other the POTUS Edited September 16 by nedboy7
JFKjr Posted September 16 Posted September 16 19 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Whataboutism. one is a dummies opinion. the other the POTUS Plenty of people have been worried about threats to America, not just you.
nedboy7 Posted September 17 Posted September 17 Kirk took the opposite position on such speech in a post on X last year. "Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There’s ugly speech. There’s gross speech. There’s evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free," he wrote.
The Frankish Reich Posted September 17 Posted September 17 1 hour ago, B-Man said: I guess it's some kind of "I am Spartacus" thing? Whatever. What idiot would give the name of a recently assassinated person to a Starbucks barista. Breaking: they didn't even laugh when I gave them the name Harry Balls.
JDHillFan Posted September 17 Posted September 17 19 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: And what's more troubling: a lot of Trump fans (including obviously many here) think that this is good policy and constitutional. Hi Frank. I just wanted to do a Psaki-like Pscircle-back on this. You declined to identify a single individual to back up your claim above. I am left to believe that this was just more uninformed hot air from one of the board’s leading purveyors of such. Prove me wrong. The use of obviously is especially fun. 1
Buffarukus Posted September 17 Posted September 17 I read a good quote recently. Liberals are angry about people losing their jobs over their speach while republicans are angry about someone losing his life for it. In the end people need to try to get a grain of dignity back. If you want every waking thought to be public then dont be suprised when the really bad ones causes a public backlash. I have no issues with flat out racists losing their jobs as much as sick people who celebrate murder. I think society cross checking them out of their online bubbles into unemployment and reality sets standards normal people sgould already have. In the end its healthy if used on extreme cases. The problem is each side gets a taste of power and then things spiral. Celebrating murder devolves into anyone that disagrees. Same as true racists devolved into people dressing in holloween costumes and ect ect. One thing i know. I dont want gov oversight over speach of anyone unless it strictly involves death threats or breaks laws already on the books. That is a road we are again getting dangerously close to.
Walking Tall Posted September 17 Posted September 17 7 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: I guess it's some kind of "I am Spartacus" thing? Whatever. What idiot would give the name of a recently assassinated person to a Starbucks barista. Breaking: they didn't even laugh when I gave them the name Harry Balls. My question is why would offend Starbuck’s so much for a person to give the name Charlie Kirk? We know the answer to that.
Recommended Posts