Jump to content

By September 1st 2026, how many cities will have been under federal control utilizing the National Guard?  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. By 9/1/2026, how many US cities will be/have been under federal control utilizing the National Guard?

    • Less than 5
      2
    • Between 5 and 10
      1
    • Between 10 and 15
      0
    • Over 15
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Wolfgang said:

My bet is around 17...

Not enough National Guard troups for that many. Citizens want crime fought but the result of these actions come close to Marshall law. 

Dems are seen as loving the corner drug dealer, accepting no bail, even being champion of no bail. They cannot win this power move by trump until they stop hugging criminals. Amazing dems fight child abuse, fight the Epsteins, but allow needles in their arms. They support counselors but don't support the need to eliminate counseling by stopping cause. They created an industry. They created Sunny Hostin and Kamala, and see them as acceptable at the same time as hugging the corner drug dealer. If the mayor of Chicago would arrest the druggies, dealers, no bail...Trump would be trumped.

But that would mean sutting down their own industries.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Not enough National Guard troups for that many. Citizens want crime fought but the result of these actions come close to Marshall law. 

Dems are seen as loving the corner drug dealer, accepting no bail, even being champion of no bail. They cannot win this power move by trump until they stop hugging criminals. Amazing dems fight child abuse, fight the Epsteins, but allow needles in their arms. They support counselors but don't support the need to eliminate counseling by stopping cause. They created an industry. They created Sunny Hostin and Kamala, and see them as acceptable at the same time as hugging the corner drug dealer. If the mayor of Chicago would arrest the druggies, dealers, no bail...Trump would be trumped.

But that would mean sutting down their own industries.

 

 

 

False...

Posted
3 hours ago, Wolfgang said:

 

 

 

Still false...

Hmmm, I post that there is logic fir trumps intervention of crime ridden cities, even if it is wrong, but suggest that no way can he can do 17 virtues at once with only National Guard...and you say false!

Are you actually just AI...or Russian paid?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

Hmmm, I post that there is logic fir trumps intervention of crime ridden cities, even if it is wrong, but suggest that no way can he can do 17 virtues at once with only National Guard...and you say false!

Are you actually just AI...or Russian paid?

 

 

 

I'm not here to answer your stupid questions...

 

Did you vote in the poll?

Posted
1 hour ago, Wolfgang said:

 

I'm not here to answer your stupid questions...

 

Did you vote in the poll?

 

 

I didn't because the correct answer (0) is not offered 

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Niagara Bill said:

Not enough National Guard troups for that many. Citizens want crime fought but the result of these actions come close to Marshall law. 

Dems are seen as loving the corner drug dealer, accepting no bail, even being champion of no bail. They cannot win this power move by trump until they stop hugging criminals. Amazing dems fight child abuse, fight the Epsteins, but allow needles in their arms. They support counselors but don't support the need to eliminate counseling by stopping cause. They created an industry. They created Sunny Hostin and Kamala, and see them as acceptable at the same time as hugging the corner drug dealer. If the mayor of Chicago would arrest the druggies, dealers, no bail...Trump would be trumped.

But that would mean sutting down their own industries.

Whether by design or by chance this threat of National Guard deployment ìs a trap for blue state governors and mayors of cities. As it is absolutely forbidden to agree with Trump on even the most insignificant thing the Dems are forced to take what appears as a pro-crime position. 

 

In Chicago some 30 or so people have been shot this weekend. And the Mayor seems comfortable with that number while vowing to protect the citizens of Chicago from the big, bad National Guard and Federal law enforcement. Issuing orders to the local police to not cooperate. The governor has issued some nonsensical proclamation pledging to protect the rights of the LGBTQ community while never saying just what rights are at risk. None it appears.

 

The libs look like scared and frightened clowns about to be shot out of a cannon at the circus while doing everything possible to avoid doing their job of protecting their citizens. 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Wolfgang said:

 

 

 

I'm not here to answer your stupid questions...

 

Did you vote in the poll?

Of course...5

You are the one who suggested 17....what a stupid answer from AI. Even the Brown shirts at this point couldn't cover 17 cities at once.

×
×
  • Create New...