Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, Roundybout said:

 

Actually quite the opposite- the effort was certainly there, and hundreds of billions of dollars of savings were found…

 

Now, whether the Establishment Republicans have the balls to make the recommended cuts, is a different story, as Elon does not have the authority to make the cuts, himself…

 

But Elon certainly did was hired to do…👍

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JaCrispy said:

Actually quite the opposite- the effort was certainly there, and hundreds of billions of dollars of savings were found…

 

Now, whether the Establishment Republicans have the balls to make the recommended cuts, is a different story, as Elon does not have the authority to make the cuts, himself…

 

But Elon certainly did was hired to do…👍

 

 

Hundreds of billions?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Rotflmao! 

Posted
3 hours ago, 4th&long said:

Hundreds of billions?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Rotflmao! 

And it was just the tip of the iceberg, especially when the budget was $6 Trillion…👍

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

He is a brilliant business man.  He ruined his own company while making a mockery of the department he ran by accomplishing basically nothing.  He really is a genius. 

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

Elon called them out. The deficit will increase. So they dismantled the federal government to give rich ***** a tax break.  It’s unreal how dumb MAGA is.  It’s all a ***** joke. 
Your thought on the big beautiful deficit @JaCrispy

Edited by nedboy7
Posted
9 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

And it was just the tip of the iceberg, especially when the budget was $6 Trillion…👍

Ja your a good dude, don't believe everything you hear. 

Posted

 


 


 

What followed was a blunt diagnosis of a system that seems designed not to solve problems, but to survive them.

 

“It’s sort of the, frankly, largely uncaring nature of bureaucracy,” Musk explained. 
 

Then he turned to Milton Friedman, quoting a line that had clearly stayed with him.

 

“As the great Milton Friedman said: ‘Money is spent most poorly when it is someone else’s money being spent on people you don’t know.’”

 

That, he said, is how federal spending works. 
 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

So Trump chooses an arrogant ass who is a drug addict to run doge. Only the best for Trump. No wonder he was acting like a psycho with his act. Now he is a billionaire with a bad bladder wearing a diaper. 

Edited by Andy1
Posted
On 5/29/2025 at 8:32 PM, 4th&long said:

And this is really all Maga cares about. Who has the problem? 

 

You do.

 

Or to be more precise - you and morons like you.

 

For the past 4 years under Sleepy Joe Biden, aided and abetted by a disgraceful activist media, the entire planet - not just the great citizens of the USA - has witnessed the attempted dismantling and mismanagement of everything sacred from the nuclear family to bastardisation of the populace by way of unfettered migration to the undermining of potential for young women to dream big in sports to responsible spending of taxpayers hard earned money. And a million other things.

 

Thanks to DT47, those days are now a thing of the past. No more bureaucratic-controlled Biden autopens or huge grants for the research of transgender behaviour of Guatemalan antelopes. It's game over for those who endorsed colossal Democrat stupidity, contempt of God-fearing American patriots and epic waste. And Elon Musk has played his part in draining the swamp.

 

Strap yourselves in lefty morons - the adults are back in charge!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Andy1 said:

So Trump chooses an arrogant ass who is a drug addict to run doge. Only the best for Trump. No wonder he was acting like a psycho with his act. Now he is a billionaire with a bad bladder wearing a diaper. Maybe MAGA women will like that. 

Andy, you seem like a good guy and you’re a good poster.  This type of story should be in the National Enquirer, not a paper once associated with quality journalism. Here’s a quick recap of the rumor being shared:

 

  • “Elon Musk…was using drugs…far more intensely…according to people.”

I know that some people believe anything (unless it’s about a president in cognitive free fall, happening right before their eyes), but which people, Andy?  Are they men or women, political friends or political foes, the waiter at his favorite restaurant or the front desk guy as Planet Fitness?  
 

Who do you think it was, and would you vouch for them as honest brokers? 
 

  • “Mr. Musk’s drug consumption went well beyond occasional use.”

With this statement, the Times changes the narrative that “some people say” and flat out declares that Musk is a drug user and states definitively he’s a regular drug user. No citation, no sources, no nothing.  
 

The next part…geesh, man, have they no standards at all at the NYT?  There’s so much waffling between allegations and declarations of fact it’s unbelievable.  My favorite is the insulation that the reporter’s sourcing is speaking to unknown people who saw pictures of a box?  Seriously Andy, you buy all this stuff? 
 

  • “It’s unclear…whether Mr. Musk…was taking drugs..at the White House.
     But he has exhibited erratic behavior…insulting…gesturing like a Nazi…and garbling answer”.  

Geesh Andy, if these are the standards, Joe Biden is likely the head of the Sinaloa cartel!  And while I can’t say for sure that 4th or Homey gesture like Nazis, but they sure as heck offer insults and on occasion most definitely garble answers. 
 

You don’t have to believe everything said or done by intrepid Times journalists, it’s ok asking even a precious few questions.  It’s Tabloid journalism and not really all that great even by that standard. 
 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Andy, you seem like a good guy and you’re a good poster.  This type of story should be in the National Enquirer, not a paper once associated with quality journalism. Here’s a quick recap of the rumor being shared:

 

  • “Elon Musk…was using drugs…far more intensely…according to people.”

I know that some people believe anything (unless it’s about a president in cognitive free fall, happening right before their eyes), but which people, Andy?  Are they men or women, political friends or political foes, the waiter at his favorite restaurant or the front desk guy as Planet Fitness?  
 

Who do you think it was, and would you vouch for them as honest brokers? 
 

  • “Mr. Musk’s drug consumption went well beyond occasional use.”

With this statement, the Times changes the narrative that “some people say” and flat out declares that Musk is a drug user and states definitively he’s a regular drug user. No citation, no sources, no nothing.  
 

The next part…geesh, man, have they no standards at all at the NYT?  There’s so much waffling between allegations and declarations of fact it’s unbelievable.  My favorite is the insulation that the reporter’s sourcing is speaking to unknown people who saw pictures of a box?  Seriously Andy, you buy all this stuff? 
 

  • “It’s unclear…whether Mr. Musk…was taking drugs..at the White House.
     But he has exhibited erratic behavior…insulting…gesturing like a Nazi…and garbling answer”.  

Geesh Andy, if these are the standards, Joe Biden is likely the head of the Sinaloa cartel!  And while I can’t say for sure that 4th or Homey gesture like Nazis, but they sure as heck offer insults and on occasion most definitely garble answers. 
 

You don’t have to believe everything said or done by intrepid Times journalists, it’s ok asking even a precious few questions.  It’s Tabloid journalism and not really all that great even by that standard. 
 

 

Hey, this is just what’s in the news and this seems to be the place to post it to let people be aware of it and stir the pot a bit. Thats all quite normal for Trumpers to do here. People will believe what they want. When the big bad wolf leaves the farm, the chickens start to squawk, so it wouldn’t be unusual for this report to come out now. It’s not the first time that Musk has reported to be a user of ketamine. Trump himself publicly speculated recently, without evidence, that the cocaine found in the White House during Biden’s term belonged to sleepy Joe or his son. Trumps FBI is now reopening the investigation into that event. Trump makes suggestive allegations, without evidence, about his targets all the time. It’s how he plays politics. So what’s fair game and what isn’t? 

Posted
2 hours ago, SydneyBillsFan said:

 

You do.

 

Or to be more precise - you and morons like you.

 

For the past 4 years under Sleepy Joe Biden, aided and abetted by a disgraceful activist media, the entire planet - not just the great citizens of the USA - has witnessed the attempted dismantling and mismanagement of everything sacred from the nuclear family to bastardisation of the populace by way of unfettered migration to the undermining of potential for young women to dream big in sports to responsible spending of taxpayers hard earned money. And a million other things.

 

Thanks to DT47, those days are now a thing of the past. No more bureaucratic-controlled Biden autopens or huge grants for the research of transgender behaviour of Guatemalan antelopes. It's game over for those who endorsed colossal Democrat stupidity, contempt of God-fearing American patriots and epic waste. And Elon Musk has played his part in draining the swamp.

 

Strap yourselves in lefty morons - the adults are back in charge!

 

Ah yes, the adults are back - the ones who brought us record deficits, reality show politics, and policy via tweet. Spare us the fantasy novel about Guatemalan antelopes and ‘God-fearing patriots.’ What you’re describing isn’t leadership, it’s a culture war tantrum dressed up as governance. If this is what ‘adults’ look like, it’s no wonder the country’s exhausted.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Andy, you seem like a good guy and you’re a good poster.  This type of story should be in the National Enquirer, not a paper once associated with quality journalism. Here’s a quick recap of the rumor being shared:

 

  • “Elon Musk…was using drugs…far more intensely…according to people.”

I know that some people believe anything (unless it’s about a president in cognitive free fall, happening right before their eyes), but which people, Andy?  Are they men or women, political friends or political foes, the waiter at his favorite restaurant or the front desk guy as Planet Fitness?  
 

Who do you think it was, and would you vouch for them as honest brokers? 
 

  • “Mr. Musk’s drug consumption went well beyond occasional use.”

With this statement, the Times changes the narrative that “some people say” and flat out declares that Musk is a drug user and states definitively he’s a regular drug user. No citation, no sources, no nothing.  
 

The next part…geesh, man, have they no standards at all at the NYT?  There’s so much waffling between allegations and declarations of fact it’s unbelievable.  My favorite is the insulation that the reporter’s sourcing is speaking to unknown people who saw pictures of a box?  Seriously Andy, you buy all this stuff? 
 

  • “It’s unclear…whether Mr. Musk…was taking drugs..at the White House.
     But he has exhibited erratic behavior…insulting…gesturing like a Nazi…and garbling answer”.  

Geesh Andy, if these are the standards, Joe Biden is likely the head of the Sinaloa cartel!  And while I can’t say for sure that 4th or Homey gesture like Nazis, but they sure as heck offer insults and on occasion most definitely garble answers. 
 

You don’t have to believe everything said or done by intrepid Times journalists, it’s ok asking even a precious few questions.  It’s Tabloid journalism and not really all that great even by that standard. 
 

 

 

So cute watching you preach about journalistic standards, but let’s be real - this isn’t about truth, it’s about protecting your idols - that's what this is all about for MAGA. If the New York Times ran an anonymous hit piece on Biden’s brain function, you'd be posting it with confetti.

 

But the second it’s about Elon a guy whose public behavior speaks louder than any unnamed source - suddenly you’re a media ethics watchdog.

 

You don’t care about facts. You just can’t handle criticism of people you’ve decided are above it and that's so you.

×
×
  • Create New...