Dion Dawkins new Josh Allen tattoo (update NOT Dion)

[WotAGuy]

I’ll fess up. It is me.  And that’s my third leg. 

[Beck Water]

On 5/13/2025 at 6:48 AM, Beast said:

I’m kinda weirded out by it.

 

That's basically what Dion said, and what Dion said about how Josh would feel about it: "I would never make my QB that uncomfortable"

 

Dion said in the video, the guy's legs are too small and his stomach is too small and he could never protect Josh Allen  

[Buffalo716]

4 hours ago, Beck Water said:

 

That's basically what Dion said, and what Dion said about how Josh would feel about it: "I would never make my QB that uncomfortable"

 

Dion said in the video, the guy's legs are too small and his stomach is too small and he could never protect Josh Allen  

I don't know what to expect out of this fan base anymore 

 

Sometimes Dion Dawkins is too fat ... Now it's good that he's not so skinny 

 

For sure the only truth in his entire statement is Josh Allen would be weirded out by it and he didn't want to do that to his quarterback 

 

You could be best friends but I'm not getting a tattoo of my best friend on my leg

[Malazan]

36 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:

You could be best friends but I'm not getting a tattoo of my best friend on my leg

What about their face on your lower back though?

[Billsfed1]

On 5/14/2025 at 3:42 AM, ChasBB said:

I'm always reminded of this Snickers commercial when players get tattoos like this ...
 

 

Classic commercial 😂

[Sierra Foothills]

20 hours ago, Richard Noggin said:

People genuinely thought this was actually Dion's leg? For real?

 

That's rough. Information literacy education never kept up with the proliferation of the internet. Education in general, really, wasn't prepared to combat intellectual laziness. And here we are. 

 

Add to the above, the increase in willful ignorance and the growth of the anti-education movement mixed with a rising apathy for truth. Some people will believe anything (particularly if it supports their emotional biases) and others don't have the motivation or intellectual endurance to to seek something approximate to the truth.

 

20 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

I mean sports illustrated and WYRK did a article on it 

 

It's hard to call anybody dumb when non-fake publications did an article on it

 

They generally have people to fact check stuff

 

I understand the mention of Sports Illustrated as lending credence to the story. There was a time when they boasted a stable of writers such as Pat Forde, Peter Gammons, Frank DeFord, Rick Reilly, and Peter King... Sports Illustrated represented the pinnacle of sports journalism.

 

Sports Illustrated is now a brand, operated under a license. They do not have an editorial board and they're on the brink of bankruptcy. It's been nearly a decade since they had any credibility.

 

As far as local country music radio stations disseminating news, let the buyer beware.

 

[Buffalo716]

2 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Add to the above, the increase in willful ignorance and the growth of the anti-education movement mixed with a rising apathy for truth. Some people will believe anything (particularly if it supports their emotional biases) and others don't have the motivation or intellectual endurance to to seek something approximate to the truth.

 

 

I understand the mention of Sports Illustrated as lending credence to the story. There was a time when they boasted a stable of writers such as Pat Forde, Peter Gammons, Frank DeFord, Rick Reilly, and Peter King... Sports Illustrated represented the pinnacle of sports journalism.

 

Sports Illustrated is now a brand, operated under a license. They do not have an editorial board and they're on the brink of bankruptcy. It's been nearly a decade since they had any credibility.

 

As far as local country music radio stations disseminating news, let the buyer beware.

 

I understand that now 

 

As far as WYRK you just made me laugh