B-Man Posted September 13 Posted September 13 THE LEFT’S BIGGEST FEAR IS THAT THE NORMALS WILL START TO STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES. That’s why they hate Kyle Rittenhouse, and that’s why they killed Charlie Kirk.
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Liberalism is so messed up that in the past 5 years they have canonized a man who was a drug dealer, an armed robber, and a terrible father who was killed in Minneapolis, they protested when a crazy person on the subway of NYC died while threatening to harm other people, and they protested against a kid from Kentucky who did nothing more than not react to someone intentionally trying to get a reaction. They then laughed at the murder of someone whose worse thing was to disagree with them. if conservatives were as pathetic as liberals this nation would right now be on fire.
sherpa Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Kind of interesting from a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz9ABh1X2rY
Wolfgang Posted September 13 Posted September 13 23 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Liberalism is so messed up that in the past 5 years they have canonized a man who was a drug dealer, an armed robber, and a terrible father who was killed in Minneapolis, they protested when a crazy person on the subway of NYC died while threatening to harm other people, and they protested against a kid from Kentucky who did nothing more than not react to someone intentionally trying to get a reaction. They then laughed at the murder of someone whose worse thing was to disagree with them. if conservatives were as pathetic as liberals this nation would right now be on fire. Liberals are simply not liberal about anything except perversion, crime and corruption... Calling them liberals anymore is the definition of irony... 1
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 54 minutes ago, sherpa said: Kind of interesting from a member of the Virginia House of Delegates. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz9ABh1X2rY Interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing. What a mess. 1
boyst Posted September 13 Posted September 13 19 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: ... Let's just say he's an American. He wants political peace.
Figster Posted September 13 Posted September 13 (edited) Kirk suspect FAR from central casting model of far left activist https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kirk-suspect-far-from-central-casting-model-of-far-left-antifa-activist-here-s-why/ar-AA1MtEcs?ocid=xboxntp&pc=U531&cvid=68c5a918a1994de3b0d5b3f938b7e93d&ei=10 Politically motivated? No Deranged killer wanting notoriety ? Yes Edited September 13 by Figster
JFKjr Posted September 13 Posted September 13 On 9/12/2025 at 10:21 AM, B-Man said: They will kill you and your family and then blame you for complaining about it. Not too long ago (last week!) one poster wished death on 'anti-vaxxers' children/grandchildren. Of course being against one or two vaccines, or delaying any of them, makes you an 'anti-vaxxer.'
Commsvet11 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Just now, Figster said: Kirk suspect FAR from central casting model of far left activist https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/kirk-suspect-far-from-central-casting-model-of-far-left-antifa-activist-here-s-why/ar-AA1MtEcs?ocid=xboxntp&pc=U531&cvid=68c5a918a1994de3b0d5b3f938b7e93d&ei=10 Politically motivated? No Deranged killer? Yes How can you say it’s not politically motivated when the only person who was targeted and murdered with scoped rifle was a political activist? If this guy a deranged killer, then there would have been no specific target and a higher body count quite positive using a weapon that inflicts the most damage to crowds The crowd had a mix of both political parties no shots taken on the crowd, just one. 1 1
Figster Posted September 13 Posted September 13 4 minutes ago, Commsvet11 said: How can you say it’s not politically motivated when the only person who was targeted and murdered with scoped rifle was a political activist? If this guy a deranged killer, then there would have been no specific target and a higher body count quite positive using a weapon that inflicts the most damage to crowds The crowd had a mix of both political parties no shots taken on the crowd, just one. Wanting notoriety is not political motivation.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, Figster said: Wanting notoriety is not political motivation. But using terms like fascists is political. 1
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 5 minutes ago, Figster said: Wanting notoriety is not political motivation. Running with “there’s no political angle here” is definitely something you should do. Makes all the sense in the world. Sigh 1
Figster Posted September 13 Posted September 13 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: But using terms like fascists is political. Term used in gaming 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: Running with “there’s no political angle here” is definitely something you should do. Makes all the sense in the world. Sigh What political party should a man belong to that attacks our Democracy?
Commsvet11 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 Just now, Figster said: Wanting notoriety is not political motivation. Then explain to me why it was only Charlie Kirk. A POLITICAL ACTIVIST that was murdered and not another person and not even another shot taken Again if the guy just wanted be famous it would have been a MASS shooting with a much higher body coun 1 1
JDHillFan Posted September 13 Posted September 13 7 minutes ago, Figster said: Term used in gaming What political party should a man belong to that attacks our Democracy? Is this some sort of 4D chess question? If not, it’s truly dimwitted.
Figster Posted September 13 Posted September 13 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Is this some sort of 4D chess question? If not, it’s truly dimwitted. Let me rephrase: Does a man deserve an allegiance with any political party when he kills to make a point? Or does this sound more like dictatorship? There is no place for killing in politics. You get that right?
Commsvet11 Posted September 13 Posted September 13 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Is this some sort of 4D chess question? If not, it’s truly dimwitted. It has to be rationalized otherwise there would a level of discomfort in their own political party. 1 minute ago, Figster said: Let me rephrase: Does a man deserve an allegiance with any political party when he kills to make a point? Or does this sound more like dictatorship? There is no place for killing in politics. You get that right? What was the point the shooter was making in your mind? 1
Recommended Posts