nedboy7 Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Funny timing on this fake news. I guess they need to go full fascist to cover up for the disgusting GOP.
JDHillFan Posted July 19 Posted July 19 2 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Funny timing on this fake news. I guess they need to go full fascist to cover up for the disgusting GOP. On 3/5/2025 at 8:59 PM, nedboy7 said: Talk about a triggered weak mind. 1 1 1
nedboy7 Posted July 19 Posted July 19 MAGA is just insane. “The Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan investigation reviewing hundreds of thousands of documents and interviewing witnesses over several years. The unanimous, bipartisan conclusion was that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the committee, said in a statement. “This is just another example of the DNI trying to cook the books, rewrite history, and erode trust in the intelligence agencies she’s supposed to be leading.” Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement, “Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment.” The FBI’s criminal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia began in 2016 and stretched into the first Trump administration. It then became the subject of investigations by the Justice Department’s inspector general and by special counsel John Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General Bill Barr to also examine the handling of intelligence that led to the Trump-Russia probe. The Durham probe ended with no finding of wrongdoing in the handling of the intelligence, but it did end with the indictment of three people, including a former FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to falsifying information in a surveillance warrant request targeting a Trump campaign aide.
nedboy7 Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Foxnews is covering this much more reasonably than this board. Now that is saying something. 😂
Big Blitz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Durham admitted this to me in a lengthy series of calls, and I kept telling everyone as soon as that admission was made. Tulsi is under no restriction. That's why you are seeing information about inside govt activity. The DC Silos are structured to keep all attention and focus on actors that exist outside govt. Tulsi is looking internal. THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE! Barr just did not believe our nation could survive a full public airing of what took place. An attempted coup using all three branches of government to target a singular political opponent. This is democracy destroying stuff... Too big to fail on a govt conspiracy level. Also, I disagreed from the outset. I have more faith in the average American person. Give us the truth of what took place and let us deal with it. Barr just didn't feel we could "deal with it" without destroying the fabric of the nation. All of this hidden institutional corruption destroys govt credibility regardless of whether a public airing takes place. At least with sunlight we would have been able to hold the corrupt actors accountable, and restore some semblance of trust. Here we are all those years later.... The credibility of all of those legacy institutions are in tatters. Bill Barr's approach was wrong. 1 1
CoudyBills Posted July 19 Posted July 19 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: Durham admitted this to me in a lengthy series of calls, and I kept telling everyone as soon as that admission was made. Tulsi is under no restriction. That's why you are seeing information about inside govt activity. The DC Silos are structured to keep all attention and focus on actors that exist outside govt. Tulsi is looking internal. THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE! Barr just did not believe our nation could survive a full public airing of what took place. An attempted coup using all three branches of government to target a singular political opponent. This is democracy destroying stuff... Too big to fail on a govt conspiracy level. Also, I disagreed from the outset. I have more faith in the average American person. Give us the truth of what took place and let us deal with it. Barr just didn't feel we could "deal with it" without destroying the fabric of the nation. All of this hidden institutional corruption destroys govt credibility regardless of whether a public airing takes place. At least with sunlight we would have been able to hold the corrupt actors accountable, and restore some semblance of trust. Here we are all those years later.... The credibility of all of those legacy institutions are in tatters. Bill Barr's approach was wrong. Bill Barr's approach has always been wrong. He didnt fear the nation couldn't take it. That piece of ***** has made a career covering ***** up for the government. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 20 Posted July 20 ..Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. Here’s how: For months preceding the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community shared a consensus view: Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack U.S. elections. But weeks after President Trump’s historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed. On Dec 8, 2016, IC officials prepared an assessment for the President's Daily Brief, finding that Russia "did not impact recent U.S. election results" by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure. Before it could reach the President, it was abruptly pulled “based on new guidance.” This key intelligence assessment was never published. The next day, top national security officials including FBI Dir James Comey, CIA Dir John Brennan and DNI James Clapper gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia. Obama directed the IC to create a new intelligence assessment that detailed Russian election meddling, even though it would contradict multiple intelligence assessments released over the previous several months. Obama officials immediately leaned on their allies in the media to advance their falsehoods. Anonymous IC sources leaked classified information to the Washington Post and others that Russia had intervened to hack the election in Trump's favor. On January 6, 2017, just days before President Trump took office, DNI Clapper unveiled the Obama-directed politicized assessment, a gross weaponization of intelligence that laid the groundwork for a years-long coup intended to subvert President Trump’s entire presidency…. According to whistleblower emails shared with us today, we know Clapper and Brennan used the baseless discredited Steele Dossier as a source to push this false narrative in the intelligence assessment. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 20 Posted July 20 Let’s see. Homeloser pushes this thread to the bottom of the page. So….. Reporter: "Did Clinton lose because of the hacking?" Obama: "I'm going to let all the political pundits in this town have a long discussion about what happened in the election." I’m going to let the State Run media and Stephen Colbert take care of the narrative.
pennstate10 Posted July 20 Posted July 20 On 7/3/2025 at 10:50 AM, Big Blitz said: Yep. Huh. Just saw this thread. Do you people seriously believe that the Watergate scandal was a lib frame up? Do you also believe that 911 was a hoax? And that the world is flat ? And that the moon landings were faked?
Big Blitz Posted July 20 Posted July 20 5 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: Huh. Just saw this thread. Do you people seriously believe that the Watergate scandal was a lib frame up? Yes. Democrats did the same thing to Nixon in 1968. Bet you didn’t know this https://millercenter.org/experts/william-j-antholis/director-presidents-spying-presidents 5 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: Do you also believe that 911 was a hoax? no 5 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: And that the world is flat ? No 5 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: And that the moon landings were faked? NO
pennstate10 Posted July 20 Posted July 20 Wow. Did you read your own link? It’s agreeing that the watergate break in and cover up were orchestrated by Nixon and cronies.   You really need to let this one go.
BillsFanNC Posted July 20 Author Posted July 20 34 minutes ago, pennstate10 said: Wow. Did you read your own link? It’s agreeing that the watergate break in and cover up were orchestrated by Nixon and cronies.   You really need to let this one go. Commie f-stain loser? 💯
B-Man Posted July 20 Posted July 20 8 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Reporter: "Did Clinton lose because of the hacking?" Obama: "I'm going to let all the political pundits in this town have a long discussion about what happened in the election." I’m going to let the State Run media and Stephen Colbert take care of the narrative. He just needed to suggest enough and the media handled the rest .
ScotSHO Posted July 20 Posted July 20 7 hours ago, pennstate10 said: Wow. Did you read your own link? It’s agreeing that the watergate break in and cover up were orchestrated by Nixon and cronies.   You really need to let this one go. Reading is FUNdamental: "There is a deeper irony, of course. We know about both Nixon transgressions because both Johnson and Nixon surveilled themselves. That is, by secretly recording their own White House conversations, Johnson and Nixon have given us a better sense of what each president knew, and when they knew it. " It's ok when team Penn St does it, but not when team Ohio St does it. 1 1
pennstate10 Posted July 20 Posted July 20 7 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Yes. Democrats did the same thing to Nixon in 1968. Bet you didn’t know this https://millercenter.org/experts/william-j-antholis/director-presidents-spying-presidents no No NO 28 minutes ago, ScotSHO said: Reading is FUNdamental: "There is a deeper irony, of course. We know about both Nixon transgressions because both Johnson and Nixon surveilled themselves. That is, by secretly recording their own White House conversations, Johnson and Nixon have given us a better sense of what each president knew, and when they knew it. " It's ok when team Penn St does it, but not when team Ohio St does it. “Watergate was in all likelihood a CIA/FBI frame up of Nixon who won 49 of 50 states” Get in the game dude. This was the quote I responded to.
Recommended Posts