Wolfgang Posted October 25 Posted October 25 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You have truly made Ned’s day by watching one of his videos. Bless both your hearts. They are two peas in a pod... 1
Niagara Bill Posted October 25 Posted October 25 8 hours ago, Homelander said: What is the point. We all know trump lies when his mouth opens. What is becoming obvious, he has not got a coherent thought, his team of henchmen think for him and he is the puppet. 1 1
Niagara Bill Posted October 26 Posted October 26 Another ten percent from trumps henchmen. By next week China and Canada will have a trade deal. If Americans will not stand up to the henchmen, others are beginning to. Close your borders, 1929 is coming again. Putin will not talk to the orangeman, because he owns him....so let's blow up a couple of mini boats in the Gulf of America...look tough, but back down from giving Ukraine Tomahawk missiles, cause Vladdy said no. MAGA has been fooled Trump is only the orange face on the poster, behind is the real power...remember the warning by maga about the secret societies. Well, you got it now. 1
nedboy7 Posted October 26 Posted October 26 President Pedo having a meltdown over an add. That’s our mentally stable president! Hey if libs are upset it must be good! 1
Homelander Posted October 26 Posted October 26 1 minute ago, nedboy7 said: President Pedo having a meltdown over an add. That’s our mentally stable president! Hey if libs are upset it must be good! The cult’s collapsing right before our eyes. Aside from @BillsFanNC and his collection of bots, even the diehards are bailing. America's had enough it’s painfully obvious... 1
nedboy7 Posted October 26 Posted October 26 56 minutes ago, Homelander said: The cult’s collapsing right before our eyes. Aside from @BillsFanNC and his collection of bots, even the diehards are bailing. America's had enough it’s painfully obvious... I have family in 4 different countries. They aren’t libs or maga. Every single one is shocked at how stupid and gullible Americans are to worship a pedo.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Listening to SCOTUS hearing. Difficult to read the tea leaves but Barrett and Roberts seem very skeptical. This could be another huge win for the country. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Listening to SCOTUS hearing. Difficult to read the tea leaves but Barrett and Roberts seem very skeptical. This could be another huge win for the country. I'm listening too. Gorsuch just destroyed Trump's Solicitor General. I don't want to read too much into it, but there's a few ways of getting to 5 votes against Trump here. Gorsuch's hypothetical (which was my hypothetical, you thief!): what if the President declares a Climate Emergency and puts a 50% tariff on all imported ICE engines? Trump's Solicitor General conceded that that would be legal/constitutional. 2
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago In the Federalist Papers, Madison was very clear that keeping the taxing and spending power solely with Congress - and not at all with the President - was essential to avoid what happens in the British monarchy. If the king/president can levy taxes (and a tariff is a tax), an immense power is effectively transferred from the legislature to the executive. And with that comes the spending power too, as the King/President uses that tariff revenue to reward those interests that align with him and his power. We've already seen Trump speculating about using tariff revenue to "compensate" farmers, etc. This is a critical constitutional issue. And even Republicans should understand that - see the example of the Climate Crisis and a huge tariff proposed by a climate activist president. 1 1
The Frankish Reich Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago I love that our "Wolfgang" finds the Federalist Papers laughable. What a great American.
B-Man Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Not everyone hearing what Frank and Joe are. ADDED: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
All_Pro_Bills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 36 minutes ago, B-Man said: Not everyone hearing what Frank and Joe are. ADDED: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx I'm reading notes from today's session and questions from the justices as skepticism over the administration's assertions that the executive branch has the power to impose tariffs under the circumstances they claim exist. Those circumstances being some extreme threat or emergency that requires presidential action (my words). If I had to guess they're going to rule against the President here, 5-4, 6-3, something like that. I read elsewhere that if Trump loses the back-up plan is to invoke some action based on the Trade Act of 1974-Section 122. I don't know a thing about this Act. Edited 1 hour ago by All_Pro_Bills 1
B-Man Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said: I'm reading notes from today's session and questions from the justices as skepticism over the administration's assertions that the executive branch has the power to impose tariffs under the circumstances they claim exist. Those circumstances being some extreme threat or emergency that requires presidential action (my words). If I had to guess they're going to rule against the President here, 5-4, 6-3, something like that. I read elsewhere that if Trump loses the back-up plan is to invoke some action based on the Trade Act of 1974-Section 122. I don't know a thing about this Act. Turley's take is skeptical of the Trump argument also.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: In the Federalist Papers, Madison was very clear that keeping the taxing and spending power solely with Congress - and not at all with the President - was essential to avoid what happens in the British monarchy. If the king/president can levy taxes (and a tariff is a tax), an immense power is effectively transferred from the legislature to the executive. And with that comes the spending power too, as the King/President uses that tariff revenue to reward those interests that align with him and his power. We've already seen Trump speculating about using tariff revenue to "compensate" farmers, etc. This is a critical constitutional issue. And even Republicans should understand that - see the example of the Climate Crisis and a huge tariff proposed by a climate activist president. The legitimacy of the court is at stake also. This is so obviously unconstitution and making it constitutional basically means the constitution is just whatever Trump says it is Justice Gorsuch warned of “a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people’s elected representatives” in Congress. 56 minutes ago, B-Man said: Not everyone hearing what Frank and Joe are. ADDED: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx So stupid
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 4 minutes ago Posted 4 minutes ago 1 hour ago, The Frankish Reich said: I love that our "Wolfgang" finds the Federalist Papers laughable. What a great American. he contributes nothing here. From some of his posts, he's probably a basement dwelling Q follower. I doubt he's taken seriously in real life either.
Recommended Posts