BillStime Posted November 17, 2023 Share Posted November 17, 2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 If they did nothing wrong - why obscure their faces? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: If they did nothing wrong - why obscure their faces? Because they are state assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 5 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: Because they are state assets. Yeah, Chris, that makes sense. Why would MAGA Mike want to hide their faces if that's the CASE you nutters keep trying to make? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 lol. Calling everyone not on team blue, maga doesn't mean anything. Wouldn't want to publish the faces or identities of assets involved in other cases. Like Ray said, there are a lot of threats right now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 36 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said: lol. Calling everyone not on team blue, maga doesn't mean anything. Wouldn't want to publish the faces or identities of assets involved in other cases. Like Ray said, there are a lot of threats right now. Pathetic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 4 hours ago, Tommy Callahan said: Because they are state assets. He LITERALLY says, "to not be charged by the DOJ", so even if your 'theory' is correct, that's not what his public statement said. This is as clear a case of obstruction of justice as could possibly be presented, and claiming that the DOJ has other copies doesn't matter, because his intent is CLEAR. Also, why does his doctrine of "Let the American people see, and make up their own minds" not apply to Hunter Biden testifying publicly??? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 🎯 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irv Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 20 minutes ago, BillStime said: 🎯 You get smacked down in a half dozen other threads. Then you recycle this nonsense. Seen it a hundred times. What a mess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted December 5, 2023 Share Posted December 5, 2023 30 minutes ago, Irv said: You get smacked down in a half dozen other threads. Then you recycle this nonsense. Seen it a hundred times. What a mess. Hoax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Callahan Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Tommy Callahan said: Do you or Mr. Benson Johnson know what the definition of colluding is?? Ironically, he uses the correct word, "coordination" afterward. If anyone needs a brush up on what collusion means, they can simply google, 'Manafort' or 'Flynn'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Frankish Reich Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 Republicans, until this week: they're hiding hundreds of hours of videos of January 6! Release them now so the public can see for themselves that these poor Americans were nothing more than peaceful protesters! Republicans now: but blur their faces so Americans can't identify their neighbors and co-workers engaging in a riot, and maybe send in a tip to the FBI! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 6 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said: Republicans, until this week: they're hiding hundreds of hours of videos of January 6! Release them now so the public can see for themselves that these poor Americans were nothing more than peaceful protesters! Republicans now: but blur their faces so Americans can't identify their neighbors and co-workers engaging in a riot, and maybe send in a tip to the FBI! It's silly. It's not like the FBI didn't already have the videotapes... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted December 6, 2023 Share Posted December 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Doc said: It's silly. It's not like the FBI didn't already have the videotapes... This has already been covered. There are security concerns, much akin to why we don't give guided tours of Fort Knox. So let's again ask why their faces are being concealed, and the answer was already plainly and clearly cited, "to protect them(the insurrectionist) from the DOJ". This poses a new question for those who actually read and follow the Constitution, does this disqualify Mike Johnson(et al involved). Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or GIVEN AID OR COMFORT to the enemies thereof. If you have no argument against this, a simple laughing emoji will suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 3 hours ago, daz28 said: This has already been covered. There are security concerns, much akin to why we don't give guided tours of Fort Knox. So let's again ask why their faces are being concealed, and the answer was already plainly and clearly cited, "to protect them(the insurrectionist) from the DOJ". This poses a new question for those who actually read and follow the Constitution, does this disqualify Mike Johnson(et al involved). Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or GIVEN AID OR COMFORT to the enemies thereof. If you have no argument against this, a simple laughing emoji will suffice. How is he giving aid or comfort? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 43 minutes ago, Doc said: How is he giving aid or comfort? He is concealing the identity of people who were alongside the people who have already been convicted of seditious conspiracy for the sole purpose of evading justice. I would imagine any attempt to keep them free/hidden would include comfort, not just simply hiding them in your basement/attic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, daz28 said: He is concealing the identity of people who were alongside the people who have already been convicted of seditious conspiracy for the sole purpose of evading justice. I would imagine any attempt to keep them free/hidden would include comfort, not just simply hiding them in your basement/attic. Which gets me back to what I said originally: the FBI/law enforcement has had these tapes, uncensored, for the past almost 3 years. Are you actually suggesting that this is the first time they've seen them? Edited December 7, 2023 by Doc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz28 Posted December 7, 2023 Share Posted December 7, 2023 20 minutes ago, Doc said: Which gets me back to what I said originally: the FBI/law enforcement has had these tapes, uncensored, for the past almost 3 years. Are you actually suggesting that this is the first time they've seen them? No, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm clearly saying and repeating exactly what Mike Johnson himself said, that he's waiting to release the tapes until after he can conceal the faces, so that the public watching the videos can't identify and report to the DOJ the people that the FBI has been unable to identify/locate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts