Jump to content

Police Terrorism Group


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, BillsToast said:

 

 

"A sheriff’s deputy appears to instruct militia members how to get away with using lethal force in a recent conversation caught on video amid raging wildfires in Oregon.

The video, posted on September 11 by freelance journalists, shows an interaction that took place in Clackamas County between armed militia members and a man who identifies himself as a sheriff’s deputy instructing them on how to use lethal force without facing any criminal charges.

 

“Don’t get yourself in a situation where you lose your rights because you pushed the limit. You all mean to do good, your hearts in the right place, but the courts nowadays don’t give a sh*t where your heart is,” the deputy in the video said. “Be advised, there are homeowners who have been prosecuted for murder because they killed some guy who was on their property. You have to prove serious physical injury or death. Now, if you throw a ***** knife in their hand after you shoot them, that’s on you.
 

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/09/video-emerges-of-alleged-oregon-deputy-telling-militia-members-how-to-get-away-with-someone-amid-wildfires/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

La'Ron Singletary former head of Rochester branch of organized terrorist police group fired for his role in coverup of the murder of Daniel Prude. 

- "Make him a suspect"

 

ROCHESTER, N.Y. — It was early June, days after the death of George Floyd, and cities around the country were erupting in protests against police brutality.

In Rochester, the streets were relatively calm, but behind closed doors, police and city officials were growing anxious. A Black man, Daniel Prude, had died of suffocation in March after police officers had placed his head in a hood and pinned him to the ground. The public had never been told about the death, but that would change if police body camera footage of the encounter got out.

“We certainly do not want people to misinterpret the officers’ actions and conflate this incident with any recent killings of unarmed Black men by law enforcement nationally,” a deputy Rochester police chief wrote in an email to his boss. “That would simply be a false narrative, and could create animosity and potentially violent blowback in this community as a result.”

 

 

His advice was clear: Don’t release the body camera footage to the Prude family’s lawyer. The police chief replied minutes later: “I totally agree.”

 

The June 4 exchange was contained in a mass of city documents released on Monday that show how the police chief, La’Ron Singletary, and other prominent Rochester officials did everything in their power to keep the troubling videos of the incident out of public view, and to prevent damaging fallout from Mr. Prude’s death.

 
  •  

The dozens of emails, police reports and internal reviews reveal an array of delay tactics — from citing hospital privacy laws to blaming an overworked employee’s backlog in processing videos — used in that mission.

The documents show how the police attempted to frame the narrative in the earliest hours, playing up Mr. Prude’s potential for danger and glossing over the tactics of the officers who pinned him, naked and hooded, to the ground before he stopped breathing.

In a police report on the confrontation, marking a box for “victim type,” an officer on the scene listed Mr. Prude — who the police believed had broken a store window that night — simply as an “individual.” But another officer circled the word in red and scribbled a note.

 

 

“Make him a suspect,” it read.

Mr. Prude’s death has sparked daily protests in Rochester, as well as accusations of a cover-up from his family. Earlier this month, the city’s mayor, Lovely Warren, suspended seven officers involved in the encounter.

The documents were contained in a 323-page internal review of Mr. Prude’s death and the city’s actions in the ensuing months. She cited the report, which she released on Monday, in her decision to fire Mr. Singletary two weeks before he was to step down.

Mr. Prude was found by the police around 3 a.m. on March 23, ranting naked in the street, telling at least one witness he had the coronavirus. Mr. Prude had just arrived at his brother’s home in Rochester, and was seemingly under the influence of PCP, his brother had told police.

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chapel Hill branch of organized terrorist police group willfully disobeys order from town council to eliminate use of chokeholds. The police intentionally wrote it into the new version of the manual that it WAS allowed. This is the police ignoring the will of the people, their employers, so that they can continue to use life threatening violence to push their agenda of power and control.

"The original ban was prompted by mounting community demands to defund the police. In response, the town council had passed a June 24 resolution that included a series of changes in the Chapel Hill Police Department; among them, the authorization of deadly force “only when there is clear and convincing evidence of imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury” and a ban on chokeholds, "effective immediately." 


But it became clear that the police department had ignored the directive to ban chokeholds at the September 9 meeting. About an hour into that meeting, Stegman asked why the police department's policy manual had revised the ban and included chokeholds in the definition of "admissible force." 


"I believe it reflects the interest of the council while also being practical in its application," Blue said, defending his interpretation of the ban by stating that it was "consistent with language we're finding across the country." 
 

"With all due respect, I'm not sure it does meet Council's interest," Karen Stegman responded, looking shocked.

"If we're going to reconsider that," Stegman said, "I think that should probably come back to the council for further discussion.""

 

https://indyweek.com/news/orange/the-chapel-hill-police-clarifies-chokehold-ban/

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

17 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Chapel Hill branch of organized terrorist police group willfully disobeys order from town council to eliminate use of chokeholds. The police intentionally wrote it into the new version of the manual that it WAS allowed. This is the police ignoring the will of the people, their employers, so that they can continue to use life threatening violence to push their agenda of power and control.

"The original ban was prompted by mounting community demands to defund the police. In response, the town council had passed a June 24 resolution that included a series of changes in the Chapel Hill Police Department; among them, the authorization of deadly force “only when there is clear and convincing evidence of imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury” and a ban on chokeholds, "effective immediately." 


But it became clear that the police department had ignored the directive to ban chokeholds at the September 9 meeting. About an hour into that meeting, Stegman asked why the police department's policy manual had revised the ban and included chokeholds in the definition of "admissible force." 


"I believe it reflects the interest of the council while also being practical in its application," Blue said, defending his interpretation of the ban by stating that it was "consistent with language we're finding across the country." 
 

"With all due respect, I'm not sure it does meet Council's interest," Karen Stegman responded, looking shocked.

"If we're going to reconsider that," Stegman said, "I think that should probably come back to the council for further discussion.""

 

https://indyweek.com/news/orange/the-chapel-hill-police-clarifies-chokehold-ban/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2020 at 5:52 PM, BullBuchanan said:

"A sheriff’s deputy appears to instruct militia members how to get away with using lethal force in a recent conversation caught on video amid raging wildfires in Oregon.

The video, posted on September 11 by freelance journalists, shows an interaction that took place in Clackamas County between armed militia members and a man who identifies himself as a sheriff’s deputy instructing them on how to use lethal force without facing any criminal charges.

 

“Don’t get yourself in a situation where you lose your rights because you pushed the limit. You all mean to do good, your hearts in the right place, but the courts nowadays don’t give a sh*t where your heart is,” the deputy in the video said. “Be advised, there are homeowners who have been prosecuted for murder because they killed some guy who was on their property. You have to prove serious physical injury or death. Now, if you throw a ***** knife in their hand after you shoot them, that’s on you.
 

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/09/video-emerges-of-alleged-oregon-deputy-telling-militia-members-how-to-get-away-with-someone-amid-wildfires/

You still running you’re propaganda campaign ?? Stop it already NOBODY IS BUYING IT !!! 

T🇺🇸R🇺🇸U🇺🇸M🇺🇸P 2020 USA USA USA 🇺🇸 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Putin said:

You still running you’re propaganda campaign ?? Stop it already NOBODY IS BUYING IT !!! 

T🇺🇸R🇺🇸U🇺🇸M🇺🇸P 2020 USA USA USA 🇺🇸 
 

Propaganda would imply I'm fictionalizing something or attempting to mislead. I'm just posting documented facts. Make up your own mind.


LaSalle branch of organized terrorist police force forgets to turn off his bodycam, jokes about shooting biker for some paid vacation
“Im shooting them, i need some paid vacation.”

 

Edited by BullBuchanan
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYC branch of organized terrorist police force suppresses peaceful exercise of first amendments rights by way of unprovoked assault with weapons and arrest. These people were protesting the forced hysterectomies on migrant women detained by ice. This type of eugenics is in line with other fascist regimes throughout history. Why are civil servants acting so violently towards their people who put food on their children's plate?
 

 

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminder: ACAB

Denver branch of organized terrorist police group sexually assault protestor with a nightstick and then charge him with disarming an officer as a result. This depraved brutality from an authoritarian regime is why people are still protesting. Is there still any surprise that domestic violence is so strongly correlated with police officers?

 

DENVER (KDVR) – Denver police are conducting an internal investigation after a man claimed he was sexually assaulted while being arrested at a protest.

Michael Jacobs was at a protest near Civic Center Park on July 29 when he was arrested and charged with disarming a police officer.

Jacobs claims that during his arrest, an officer used his baton inappropriately to violate him.

“As I was on the ground, and as I was completely helpless, someone took what felt to be a nightstick and just shoved it up my butt. After that it was pretty much done,” Jacobs told KDVR. 

On Wednesday, Denver Police confirmed that they are conducting an internal investigation into Jacobs’ allegations.

The criminal case against Jacobs is still pending and is being handled by the Denver County District Attorney’s office.



https://www.wjtv.com/news/national/protester-claims-he-was-sexually-assaulted-by-denver-police-officer-during-arrest/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Reminder: ACAB

Denver branch of organized terrorist police group sexually assault protestor with a nightstick and then charge him with disarming an officer as a result. This depraved brutality from an authoritarian regime is why people are still protesting. Is there still any surprise that domestic violence is so strongly correlated with police officers?

 

DENVER (KDVR) – Denver police are conducting an internal investigation after a man claimed he was sexually assaulted while being arrested at a protest.

Michael Jacobs was at a protest near Civic Center Park on July 29 when he was arrested and charged with disarming a police officer.

Jacobs claims that during his arrest, an officer used his baton inappropriately to violate him.

“As I was on the ground, and as I was completely helpless, someone took what felt to be a nightstick and just shoved it up my butt. After that it was pretty much done,” Jacobs told KDVR. 

On Wednesday, Denver Police confirmed that they are conducting an internal investigation into Jacobs’ allegations.

The criminal case against Jacobs is still pending and is being handled by the Denver County District Attorney’s office.



https://www.wjtv.com/news/national/protester-claims-he-was-sexually-assaulted-by-denver-police-officer-during-arrest/

  OK, so being forced to the ground is not whipping up the hysteria it used to so now we are on to improbable sexual assault.  I would not think that a nightstick would so easily insert...................................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  OK, so being forced to the ground is not whipping up the hysteria it used to so now we are on to improbable sexual assault.  I would not think that a nightstick would so easily insert...................................

What are you basing this accusation on?

"He obtained a rape kit and doctors who evaluated him two weeks later found evidence of rectal and anal hemorrhage, KDVR reported.

“I’ve been having to go to GI doctors since and have them explain to me why I have hemorrhoids bleeding out of my [sic] rectum,” Jacobs said"



https://nypost.com/2020/09/17/protester-accuses-denver-cop-of-sexual-assault-during-arrest/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:

What are you basing this accusation on?

"He obtained a rape kit and doctors who evaluated him two weeks later found evidence of rectal and anal hemorrhage, KDVR reported.

“I’ve been having to go to GI doctors since and have them explain to me why I have hemorrhoids bleeding out of my [sic] rectum,” Jacobs said"



https://nypost.com/2020/09/17/protester-accuses-denver-cop-of-sexual-assault-during-arrest/

  None of what you posted is the same as documented proof such as recording the "rape" as it happened in real time.  2 weeks is plenty of time to go to the adult toy shop and prod one's self with their purchases.  Why not go to the ER as soon as it allegedly happened?  If this was for real there could have been life threatening complications.  Especially if the cop was not willing to "grease the skids" so to speak.  Wouldn't you go to the ER immediately out of concern that something could have been seriously torn?

2 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

 

  That recording is anything but conclusive in terms of what you claim to have happened.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  None of what you posted is the same as documented proof such as recording the "rape" as it happened in real time.  2 weeks is plenty of time to go to the adult toy shop and prod one's self with their purchases.  Why not go to the ER as soon as it allegedly happened?  If this was for real there could have been life threatening complications.  Especially if the cop was not willing to "grease the skids" so to speak.  Wouldn't you go to the ER immediately out of concern that something could have been seriously torn?

See the video.

If you saw a cop rape someone in full 4k with studio lighting on live TV you'd probably have an excuse for why it was fake or he deserved it, wouldn't you? Is it possible for a police officer to do wrong in your eyes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:

See the video.

If you saw a cop rape someone in full 4k with studio lighting on live TV you'd probably have an excuse for why it was fake or he deserved it, wouldn't you? Is it possible for a police officer to do wrong in your eyes? 

  See my previous post.  I don't see anything conclusive to lead me to believe your claim.  Any footage from a different vantage point?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  None of what you posted is the same as documented proof such as recording the "rape" as it happened in real time.  2 weeks is plenty of time to go to the adult toy shop and prod one's self with their purchases.  Why not go to the ER as soon as it allegedly happened?  If this was for real there could have been life threatening complications.  Especially if the cop was not willing to "grease the skids" so to speak.  Wouldn't you go to the ER immediately out of concern that something could have been seriously torn?

First of all, he was arrested, so I'm not sure he could have gone anywhere right away. Second of all, I'm not sure you understand the implications of going to the ER in America. I went in last feb and all I got were a handful of blood tests and a saline drip and the bill was $7k. Something live this could have easily been in the $10's of thousands of dollars. it also didn't say that he didn't go to the ER, just that the doctors that evaluated him later confirmed the damage.

2 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  See my previous post.  I don't see anything conclusive to lead me to believe your claim.  Any footage from a different vantage point?  

Just the internal police investigation, the victim's statement, the doctor's statement, and the video. If you're looking for a "gonzo" angle of the baton entering his anus, you'll have to search elsewhere. It's not my claim- it's the victim's.

Edited by BullBuchanan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

First of all, he was arrested, so I'm not sure he could have gone anywhere right away. Second of all, I'm not sure you understand the implications of going to the ER in America. I went in last feb and all I got were a handful of blood tests and a saline drip and the bill was $7k. Something live this could have easily been in the $10's of thousands of dollars. it also didn't say that he didn't go to the ER, just that the doctors that evaluated him later confirmed the damage.

Just the internal police investigation, the victim's statement, the doctor's statement, and the video. If you're looking for a "gonzo" angle of the baton entering his anus, you'll have to search elsewhere. It's not my claim- it's the victim's.

  Being arrested does not mean you are denied medical attention.  The cops could do little more in building a lawsuit against them by denying medical attention.  I've been to the ER for things such as kidney stones and the response by the ER has always been very satisfactory.  The doctor's statement who did not see the protestor for nearly two weeks after the alleged incident?  Keeping in mind that this is a family site I would limit my comment to a dry baton hit deep without serious life threatening damage then and there?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  Being arrested does not mean you are denied medical attention.  The cops could do little more in building a lawsuit against them by denying medical attention.  I've been to the ER for things such as kidney stones and the response by the ER has always been very satisfactory.  The doctor's statement who did not see the protestor for nearly two weeks after the alleged incident?  Keeping in mind that this is a family site I would limit my comment to a dry baton hit deep without serious life threatening damage then and there?  

Are you denying that the officer strike him with the baton in the direction of that area twice @ 7 seconds into the video? According to his own statements from the link provided on his friend's twitter account he spent the night in the hospital handcuffed to a gurney. Since the incident took place the police have gone 6 weeks without providing any sort of discovery to his lawyer.

Why are you fighting so hard on this with no evidence to refute the multiple points provided beyond simple disbelief that they are true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

Are you denying that the officer strike him with the baton in the direction of that area twice @ 7 seconds into the video? According to his own statements from the link provided on his friend's twitter account he spent the night in the hospital handcuffed to a gurney. Since the incident took place the police have gone 6 weeks without providing any sort of discovery to his lawyer.

Why are you fighting so hard on this with no evidence to refute the multiple points provided beyond simple disbelief that they are true?

  Not being able to form a coherent statement from the beginning creates a lot of doubt in what you say.  Why not say he was at the hospital the same night as the alleged assault from the beginning?  You are the one desperate to make a point so the burden falls on you.  A strike in the same region as the anus does not equate to further contact such as what you describe.  This 6 week "stonewalling" been verified or is it just another unbacked statement.  Without some stunning real evidence I think we are done here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RochesterRob said:

  Not being able to form a coherent statement from the beginning creates a lot of doubt in what you say.  Why not say he was at the hospital the same night as the alleged assault from the beginning?  You are the one desperate to make a point so the burden falls on you.  A strike in the same region as the anus does not equate to further contact such as what you describe.  This 6 week "stonewalling" been verified or is it just another unbacked statement.  Without some stunning real evidence I think we are done here.

It's a statement from his attorney. Again, what to you would be "stunning real evidence"? I have 11 pages of clear evidence of police brutality in this thread, but apparently it's all circumspect to you.

I didn't say he was at the hospital initially, because I just found out now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...