BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, SCBills said: Media pushing narratives like this are red-pilling a-lot of people who are actually watching the trial. Once again, media/journos prove that they are the enemy of the people. They are purposefully pushing false narratives to viewers who they know don’t know any better, in an effort to instigate more division and hate. All I have heard from Fox News is that Kyle is not guilty because he was defending himself. These talking points have been repeated over and over again for over a year. But you aren’t talking about Fox News or any of the other “sources” Bonnie has been pushing since August 2020? Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, BillStime said: All I have heard from Fox News is that Kyle is not guilty because he was defending himself. Well, that’s what happened… 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 10 minutes ago, BillStime said: So you posted an article from Daily Caller - thinking you had a smoking gun - and you didn’t even watch the guys testimony? Um, no, that wasn't the smoking gun. It was just (more) evidence of the corruption of the ADA in this case. The smoking gun is the video of the incident. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, Doc said: Um, no, that wasn't the smoking gun. It was just (more) evidence of the corruption of the ADA in this case. The smoking gun is the video of the incident. So you didn’t watch his testimony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherlock Holmes Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 21 minutes ago, Doc said: Back? I never left. I've just been reading the thread and didn't have much else to add other than KR will be acquitted and Kenosha will burn, again. You forgot @BillStimewill be crying again... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, SCBills said: Well, that’s what happened… So in other words - you are a hack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 5 minutes ago, BillStime said: So you didn’t watch his testimony? Like I said, the video is all I need to know. The only things from testimony that stand out are when someone tells the world that the ADA told him to lie. That's a bold move you don't often hear (and for good reason). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Back to the thread........ Jeffrey Toobin: It seems like Kyle Rittenhouse has a 'plausible case of self defense' https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2021/11/10/jeffrey-toobin-it-seems-like-kyle-rittenhouse-has-a-plausible-case-of-self-defense-n428473 🎼 Turn out the Lights, the party's over 🎶 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Just now, Doc said: Like I said, the video is all I need to know. The only things from testimony that stand out are when someone tells the world that the ADA told him to lie. That's a bold move you don't often hear (and for good reason). You didn’t watch his testimony - admit it Doc. That’s why this case is still proceeding and hasn’t been declared a mistrial. Also why you posted an article from Tuckers Daily Caller. Why won’t you find the whole video and post it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 1 minute ago, BillStime said: You didn’t watch his testimony - admit it Doc. That’s why this case is still proceeding and hasn’t been declared a mistrial. Also why you posted an article from Tuckers Daily Caller. Why won’t you find the whole video and post it? The judge is not going to declare a mistrial. Much less with prejudice. 4 minutes ago, B-Man said: Back to the thread........ Jeffrey Toobin: It seems like Kyle Rittenhouse has a 'plausible case of self defense' https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2021/11/10/jeffrey-toobin-it-seems-like-kyle-rittenhouse-has-a-plausible-case-of-self-defense-n428473 🎼 Turn out the Lights, the party's over 🎶 Ouch. When you've lost Toobin (it)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: So in other words - you are a hack. I watched a good portion of the trial and came to that conclusion. Have you? Fox News isn’t always correct, and they are certainly biased, but they are right if their talking heads are pushing that this was self defense. Even the prosecutor knows he doesn’t have a case based off his bonkers display today that almost got the trial booted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 2 minutes ago, Doc said: The judge is not going to declare a mistrial. Much less with prejudice. Ouch. When you've lost Toobin (it)... Post the video doc - do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, SCBills said: I watched a good portion of the trial and came to that conclusion. Have you? Fox News isn’t always correct, and they are certainly biased, but they are right if their talking heads are pushing that this was self defense. Even the prosecutor knows he doesn’t have a case based off his bonkers display today that almost got the trial booted. LMAO - yea I’m watching the trial. It’s an absolute shitttshiw watching the “judge” collude with the defense. Highly inappropriate. But of course your “unbiased” media sources - who have already declared Kyle not guilty - are purposefully pushing false narratives to viewers who they know don’t know any better, in an effort to instigate more division and hate. Sound familiar, hack? Because - if the jury should actually declare Kyle guilty - how will you feel? Do you think your sources - and Bonnie’s sources - won’t instigate more hate divide and ultimately violence? You are a hack. Edited November 11, 2021 by BillStime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Back to the thread........ Andrew McCarthy at National Review. While the testimony took place today, McCarthy reminded readers that a refusal to testify would also have been a risk. And given how badly prosecutors had performed already, the gamble here was calculated … and likely a winner: (2) Rittenhouse appears to be a likeable kid (or at least, not unlikeable). He is no rocket scientist but not dumb, and he obviously feels very strongly that he is innocent. He has clearly been dying to explain why. Critically, he does not have a criminal record to speak of, so the prosecutors cannot paint him as a died-in-the-wool bad guy. The examination is focusing on the facts of this case, and here, that helps the defense. (3) In murder cases, juries want the defendant to get on the stand, look them in the eye, and tell them that he is innocent. It is obviously not required, and juries try hard to follow the court’s instruction that they may not count a defendant’s decision not to testify against him. But a defendant who can pull it off — even one facing more damning evidence than Rittenhouse is — greatly advances his chance of being acquitted. (4) The prosecutors in this case have been ineffective. Judges, no matter how annoyed they get at the lawyers, try not to bash them in front of the jury. But Judge Bruce Schroeder has lost his patience with these prosecutors a few times. And the worst episodes have involved badgering witnesses — including the prosecutors’ own witnesses — who have not testified as the prosecutors hoped. One defense witness even claimed, credibly, that the prosecutors pressured him, in a private prep session, to change his version of events. Rittenhouse’s able defense lawyers clearly calculated that their client would be obnoxiously badgered by the prosecutor, that Rittenhouse could handle it, and that the defendant would become more sympathetic in the jury’s eyes, while the state seemed more desperate. It was a good bet. Even in their wildest dreams, the defense lawyers couldn’t have imagined that a prosecutor would flirt with reversible constitutional error by arguably using Rittenhouse’s Fifth Amendment privilege against him, as Caroline’s report details. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-is-rittenhouse-testifying/ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 9 minutes ago, BillStime said: Post the video doc - do it. Why? Will it somehow erase the facts on video showing it was self-defense? Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCBills Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: LMAO - yea I’m watching the trial. It’s an absolute shitttshiw watching the “judge” collude with the defense. Highly inappropriate. But of course your “unbiased” media sources - who have already declared Kyle not guilty - are purposefully pushing false narratives to viewers who they know don’t know any better, in an effort to instigate more division and hate. Sound familiar, hack? Because - if the jury should actually declare Kyle guilty - how will you feel? Do you think your sources - and Bonnie’s sources - won’t instigate more hate divide and ultimately violence? You are a hack. Why are you so angry? I made my conclusion based off the evidence. The mountains of video evidence and testimony that show this was self defense. I don’t need anyone to tell me how to think, nor do I need anyone to validate my views. Why do you feel Rittenhouse should be found guilty?.. and what do you believe he was guilty of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 1 minute ago, SCBills said: Why are you so angry? I made my conclusion based off the evidence. The mountains of video evidence and testimony that show this was self defense. I don’t need anyone to tell me how to think, nor do I need anyone to validate my views. Why do you feel Rittenhouse should be found guilty?.. and what do you believe he was guilty of? They didn't tell him. All they told him is that it's all a conspiracy by the judge to (successfully) make the ADA look like an incompetent fool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 4 minutes ago, SCBills said: Why are you so angry? I made my conclusion based off the evidence. The mountains of video evidence and testimony that show this was self defense. I don’t need anyone to tell me how to think, nor do I need anyone to validate my views. Why do you feel Rittenhouse should be found guilty?.. and what do you believe he was guilty of? Is the trial over? 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Why? Will it somehow erase the facts on video showing it was self-defense? Nope. Then why did you post the link to Tuckers Daily Caller about that witness? You have no idea what followed in his testimony - do you? 5 minutes ago, Doc said: They didn't tell him. All they told him is that it's all a conspiracy by the judge to (successfully) make the ADA look like an incompetent fool. Post the video - show off their incompetence. Post it - what’s to hide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 Bonnie - did you donate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeGOATski Posted November 11, 2021 Share Posted November 11, 2021 3 hours ago, LeviF said: lmao yeah the Proud Boys started a riot in response to a clean shoot of a black dude. Give us a *****in break dude That's not at all what I said, but this is a typical response for the PPP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts