Jump to content

Conservative Supreme Court Says: Vote During Pandemic!


Recommended Posts

Sides with Republicans so an easier way to vote will be a president setting matter. They could have waited and used mail in ballots, just like they might have to do in November. 

 

“They had things -- levels of voting that if you ever agreed to it you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”--Yup, if the people can easily vote...

 

 

Quote

 

Just the caption of the case — Republican National Committee v. Democratic National Committee — was foreboding for a Supreme Court that likes to cast itself as above partisan politics.

Little wonder then that just hours after the court’s hastily written, 5 to 4 decision for Republicans in Tuesday’s election in Wisconsin, it was being denounced on social media as the latest version of Bush v. Gore.

The scant, 10-page opinion issued Monday night highlighted the court’s ideological and partisan divide. The justices’ inability to speak with one voice on matters as serious as the coronavirus pandemic and voting rights raised concerns about the legal battles bound to proliferate before the fall elections.

 

“It is a very bad sign for November that the court could not come together and find some form of compromise here in the midst of a global pandemic unlike anything we have seen in our lifetimes,” Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California at Irvine, wrote on his Election Law Blog.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rules-for-republicans-over-wisconsin-vote-highlighting-partisan-divide-before-november-poll/2020/04/07/ed18b1e0-78d5-11ea-a130-df573469f094_story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ScotSHO said:

 

Exactly, get voter ID going and remote voting becomes a slam dunk.

would absolutely love, love, love to see it put on the blockchain. it would remove all question and corruption. and for that reason, it will never happen.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Foxx said:

would absolutely love, love, love to see it put on the blockchain. it would remove all question and corruption. and for that reason, it will never happen.

Can't be done before November during a pandemic. You still want voters going out to get this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Can't be done before November during a pandemic. You still want voters going out to get this? 

i don't want the Dems, or anyone for that matter, to cheat. you don't justify one evil with another.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Foxx said:

i don't want the Dems, or anyone for that matter, to cheat. you don't justify one evil with another.

That's just an excuse for voter suppression. Let them vote by mail in ballot, in every state. Nancy will have that in the next bailout bill. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's just an excuse for voter suppression. Let them vote by mail in ballot, in every state. Nancy will have that in the next bailout bill. ?

i don't care what Nancy puts where, it ain't happening so you might as well accept that now.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

That's just an excuse for voter suppression. Let them vote by mail in ballot, in every state. Nancy will have that in the next bailout bill. ?

“ Voter suppression” is a liberal talking point meaning “ making it difficult to cheat”. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Sides with Republicans so an easier way to vote will be a president setting matter. They could have waited and used mail in ballots, just like they might have to do in November. 

 

“They had things -- levels of voting that if you ever agreed to it you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”--Yup, if the people can easily vote...

 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rules-for-republicans-over-wisconsin-vote-highlighting-partisan-divide-before-november-poll/2020/04/07/ed18b1e0-78d5-11ea-a130-df573469f094_story.html

So, voting needs to be made easier so more democrats can vote? Not sure I even want the people that are that stupid actually deciding who the leaders of our country are. Is this admission that the democrats are victims because of their low intelligence?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

So, voting needs to be made easier so more democrats can vote? Not sure I even want the people that are that stupid actually deciding who the leaders of our country are. Is this admission that the democrats are victims because of their low intelligence?

 

Look man, the dead can't go to the polls and cast a vote in person. They need this so that their deceased voices can be heard. Forcing them to prove who they are by obtaining photo ID is wrong, and bad, and badwrong.

 

Why are you racist against the deadites? They just want to vote uniformly Democrat and be left alone! They don't have time for your racist hate.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...