Buffalo_Gal Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: If you were really the luker you say you are, you'd know... Just saying. oh come on, @B-Man is about to get lucky. ? 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 24 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I am rapidly coming to that conclusion. It is disappointing. Is this the point in time where I say "I told you so", or is it too soon? 43 minutes ago, Foxx said: must you always be an asshat? what do you have against the proliferation of information? because most of it is rational and makes sense that goes against your would have narrative? information only enhances the formation of opinions. it would appear that you would prefer uninformed opinions be developed, how sad is that. just piss off would you, you really add nothing here. if you could be genuine, you would contribute a much needed counter point, yet you can't do it so ... just piss off. JA: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 minute ago, SugarCone said: I'd be happy to hop on discord or something if you're interested. I don't know why your first inclination is I am the same person as someone else? Or - I'll DM you my phone number and we can chat. No thanks. but I guess that I would like address your 'opinion' on regurgitated articles being posted.................since that is a common complaint from the blinders wearing, "don't attack my beliefs" posters on PPP I search dozens of sites most days, which includes hundreds of authors. The complaint from the lib posters here is that they are almost exclusively Conservative. Well..........that's kind of the point. The conservative thoughts and responses are very seldom even seen by the leftists here and if they read even one..........that is a good thing. I will leave it to the others to do that back and force challenging thing. I'm 65, there is very little chance that I am going to be upset or intimidated by anything on a Bills message board. But, there is occasionally something written here by one of our (higher level) libs that I don't know, and that is always interesting. . 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: No thanks. but I guess that I would like address your 'opinion' on regurgitated articles being posted.................since that is a common complaint from the blinders wearing, "don't attack my beliefs" posters on PPP I search dozens of sites most days, which includes hundreds of authors. The complaint from the lib posters here is that they are almost exclusively Conservative. Well..........that's kind of the point. The conservative thoughts and responses are very seldom even seen by the leftists here and if they read even one..........that is a good thing. I will leave it to the others to do that back and force challenging thing. I'm 65, there is very little chance that I am going to be upset or intimidated by anything on a Bills message board. But, there is occasionally something written here by one of our (higher level) libs that I don't know, and that is always interesting. . Wait until I call you on the phone! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 ....................... . 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCone Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 18 minutes ago, B-Man said: No thanks. but I guess that I would like address your 'opinion' on regurgitated articles being posted.................since that is a common complaint from the blinders wearing, "don't attack my beliefs" posters on PPP I search dozens of sites most days, which includes hundreds of authors. The complaint from the lib posters here is that they are almost exclusively Conservative. Well..........that's kind of the point. The conservative thoughts and responses are very seldom even seen by the leftists here and if they read even one..........that is a good thing. I will leave it to the others to do that back and force challenging thing. I'm 65, there is very little chance that I am going to be upset or intimidated by anything on a Bills message board. But, there is occasionally something written here by one of our (higher level) libs that I don't know, and that is always interesting. . I appreciate the idea of being exposed to contrarian ideas, as I agree that sometimes we live in our own echo chambers. I think its a mature state of mind to be open to having your mind changed. Everyone needs an alternative point of view - but I think we can do better than posting propaganda from either side. I would be just as frustrated if there was someone in here drowning out dissent spamming links from CNN's twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transplantbillsfan Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: You don't know what she linked (which was an interview from first hand people involved in the matter) yet you still think it's not good evidence because it came from YouTube. Things NPCs say. You're TERRIBLE at this. When did I say it's not good evidence? I can't verify the veracity of it or not. I said I can't view it. You're portraying yourself as a very small man. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, SugarCone said: I appreciate the idea of being exposed to contrarian ideas, as I agree that sometimes we live in our own echo chambers. I think its a mature state of mind to be open to having your mind changed. Everyone needs an alternative point of view - but I think we can do better than posting propaganda from either side. I would be just as frustrated if there was someone in here drowning out dissent spamming links from CNN's twitter. Propaganda = primary source documents and statements now from the key players involved? Someone is full of it. Just now, transplantbillsfan said: When did I say it's not good evidence? I can't verify the veracity of it or not. I said I can't view it. You're portraying yourself as a very small man. Yet I'm towering over you because you won't answer a simple question. You've exposed yourself to be nothing but an NPC. Sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 When you lose Rolling Stone ... you've lost your control of the narrative. 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCone Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 (edited) 22 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: True indeed. Ball is in Barr's court. Money is long against it, but I'm still quite confident it's coming. Examples like this represent a confusing trend, a link to a tweet from someone like "RNC Research" (I can't imagine why anyone would suspect them of bias), that links to a YouTube video from NBC... but is not actually on NBC's channel, but on a different channel called "GOP War Room"? Are you oblivious to how this appears to anyone who is interested in hearing your message at face value? You say you are citing the source material but you're three levels deep here. Edited December 10, 2019 by SugarCone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 What I don’t understand is unless the IG was living under a rock for the last three years how can no political bias be found? Did he not see the text messages from Struck and Page? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCone Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: When you lose Rolling Stone ... you've lost your control of the narrative. See example #2, Why not just link to the article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 Just now, SugarCone said: Examples like represent a confusing trend, a link to a tweet from someone like "RNC Research" (I can't imagine why anyone would suspect them of bias), that links to a YouTube video from NBC... but is not actually on NBC's channel, but on a different channel called "GOP War Room"? Are you oblivious to how this appears to anyone who is interested in hearing your message at face value? You say you are citing the source material but you're three levels deep here. The information shared is an NBC clip. It has nothing to do with the twitter account. You're free to dismiss it or view it, but it's relevant information to the topic at hand being shared freely to cut through the noise. We're in a (dis)information war. Learning how to hone your own individual discernment is the only way to survive it. That means reading everything, from all sources, and holding them up to one another to see what's what. And the track record of the MSM or "reputable" media outlets on this very story the past three years has been nothing short of criminal. Just now, SugarCone said: See example #2, Why not just link to the article? That is a link to the article. With the AUTHOR's statement. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCone Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: The information shared is an NBC clip. It has nothing to do with the twitter account. You're free to dismiss it or view it, but it's relevant information to the topic at hand being shared freely to cut through the noise. We're in a (dis)information war. Learning how to hone your own individual discernment is the only way to survive it. That means reading everything, from all sources, and holding them up to one another to see what's what. And the track record of the MSM or "reputable" media outlets on this very story the past three years has been nothing short of criminal. Then why wrap the link in the tweet if it has nothing to do with the clip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 minute ago, SugarCone said: Then why wrap the link in the tweet if it has nothing to do with the clip? Specifically to piss you off. And sort the mindless NPCs from the serious posters. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 1 hour ago, transplantbillsfan said: I'm telling the truth. No Youtube access. Get frustrated if you want, but that's the truth. Is Youtube really the place to go for this irrefutably sourced evidence? Transplant from Pennsylvania Amish country. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, SugarCone said: Then why wrap the link in the tweet if it has nothing to do with the clip? Google anything from Derranged Moron's opuses (deep state thread, etc) and you'll easily find out all he/she/it does is tweet. Edited December 10, 2019 by Gary Busey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SugarCone Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Specifically to piss you off. And sort the mindless NPCs from the serious posters. I think its funny that you can't answer the question. Why wrap everything in tweets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 Just now, SugarCone said: I think its funny that you can't answer the question. Why wrap everything in tweets? I did answer it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Google anything from Derranged Moron's opuses (deep state thread, etc) and you'll easily find out all he/she/it does is tweet. "I'll try to keep it peaceful and positive in this thread. Let's all try to do the same." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts