Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, Gary Busey said:

Is Romney really the first member of an impeached president's party to vote to convict?

That does not seem right to me. A. Johnson was a War Democrat but he was in Republican Lincoln's administartion and was impeached by the Radical Republicans. So wasn't he a Republican impeached by Republicans? Or is he considered a Democrat? I dunno 

Posted

 

 

 

This effort was doomed to fail from the beginning — for better or for worse — and they pushed for it anyway, as though they actually believed they would get what they wanted. And now they act shocked and appalled by the inevitable outcome of all this.

 

 

 
 
 
 
.
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

They swore an oath, does that even mean anything? Seems like a joke to a lot of the so-called faithful 

We don't, why should they? 

They swore an oath to defend the constitution. The God part is the baseline upon which to measure that oath. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

They swore an oath to defend the constitution. The God part is the baseline upon which to measure that oath. 

Trump swore to faithfully execute the laws, he violated his oath. So...impeachment.

 

Do I have to explain the law thing? 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

i am a bit perplexed here.

 

i don't see very many people, or anyone at all really talking about just how low the standard has just been established by the House Democrats. i mean, we just had a case brought to the United States Senate that was based entirely upon hearsay and conjecture. the only factual evidence in play was the transcript and it clearly shows there was no quid pro quo there. the rest was merely an attempt at mind reading and trying to paint a computer picture that looks okay from a distance but as anyone with a brain knows, the closer you get to it, the shittier it looks.

 

what the House Dems did is a travesty to justice, political, criminal or civil. the Repubs are almost as culpable, the proper course of action would have been to laugh at it and throw it out of court by dismissing it with prejudice. 

 

perhaps our human rights are the ones that took the biggest blow in all this.

  • Like (+1) 8
Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump swore to faithfully execute the laws, he violated his oath. So...impeachment.

 

Do I have to explain the law thing? 

this should be good.

 

go!

  • Sad 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Foxx said:

this should be good.

 

go!

Jan 16, 2020 - Updated at 6:20 p.m. ET. A federal watchdog concluded that President Trump broke the law when he froze assistance funds for Ukraine last ...
 
 
And....3....2....1.....FAKE NEWS!!!! 
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
Jan 16, 2020 - Updated at 6:20 p.m. ET. A federal watchdog concluded that President Trump broke the law when he froze assistance funds for Ukraine last ...
 
 
And....3....2....1.....FAKE NEWS!!!! 

you didn't cite law.

 

the very first line of your article, "A federal watchdog concluded".

 

this is why you libs are so ***** in the head, you don't understand fact from emotion.

 

try again, Shirley.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

you didn't cite law.

 

the very first line of your article, "A federal watchdog concluded".

 

this is why you libs are so ***** in the head, you don't understand fact from emotion.

 

try again, Shirley.


You expect anything less from people who live their lives hating someone 24/7/365?

Edited by njbuff
Posted
1 minute ago, Foxx said:

you didn't cite law.

 

the very first line of your article, "A federal watchdog concluded".

 

this is why you libs are so ***** in the head, you don't understand fact from emotion.

 

try again, Shirley.

Lol, those are not liberals, they are a federal watch dog organization. The law was the one passed by Congress and Trump did not "faithfully execute" the law he was entrusted to carry out. That law was the aid to Ukraine. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, njbuff said:


You expect anything less from people who live their lives hating someone 24/7/365?

 

366 this year. A bonus day of hate!!

  • Haha (+1) 8
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lol, those are not liberals, they are a federal watch dog organization. The law was the one passed by Congress and Trump did not "faithfully execute" the law he was entrusted to carry out. That law was the aid to Ukraine. 

 

 

 

 

Cite the ****ing law!

And you better read the damn thing too, because I can show you in it too how the OMB HAS to document that the money is being used for what it is given for!

Edited by Cinga
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Cinga said:

Cite the ****ing law!

And you better read the damn thing too, because I can show you in it too how the OMB HAS money is being used for what it is given for.

Sure, we all know that when they got caught, they released the money. That's not a defense at all. 

 

Why are you guys going to such lengths to obfuscate this? Are your lives so tied to this guy that you will sell your souls? 

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lol, those are not liberals, they are a federal watch dog organization. The law was the one passed by Congress and Trump did not "faithfully execute" the law he was entrusted to carry out. That law was the aid to Ukraine. 

bing, bang, zoom... right over your  head willis.

 

the lib i was referring to was you.

 

geesus, pull your head out yer ass and get a *****in' clue.

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Sure, we all know that when they got caught, they released the money. That's not a defense at all. 

 

Why are you guys going to such lengths to obfuscate this? Are your lives so tied to this guy that you will sell your souls? 

idiot, they released the aid before the end of the fiscal year as was required by law. you can say whatever you want, the fact remains what the actual facts on the ground are.

Edited by Foxx
Posted
1 minute ago, Foxx said:

bing, bang, zoom... right over your  head willis.

 

the lib i was referring to was you.

 

geesus, pull your head out yer ass and get a *****in' clue.

 

You took all that time just to have a little primal scream? lol 

 

As time goes on, you will admit that what he did was wrong and impeachable. Partisan feelings run high 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

You took all that time just to have a little primal scream? lol 

 

As time goes on, you will admit that what he did was wrong and impeachable. Partisan feelings run high 

yeah, you got no response as to what the actual law is because your too dumb to understand it, let alone be able to find it and copy/paste it here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Foxx said:

yeah, you got no response as to what the actual law is because your too dumb to understand it, let alone be able to find it and copy/paste it here.

I explained that, you ignored it. The aid was a law, it was legislation that was not carried out as intended. 

×
×
  • Create New...