OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 31 minutes ago, B-Man said: ...Smitten Mitt.......another irrelevant whiny loser just like Hillary.......get effin' lost................
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 When you lose Rolling Stone... And the award for the best troll tweet of the weekend: 3 2
B-Man Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 How Not to Impeach a President by George Parry Original Article With the 51 to 49 vote not to call witnesses, the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump is on track to an acquittal. And so the Trump impeachment saga is coming to an end not with a bang but a whine. “We wuz robbed!” shriek the foot-stomping Democrats as they repeat their poll-tested mantra that the trial was rigged because no witnesses were called to testify. Consequently, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has decreed that the president will remain impeached forever, and his presidency and all that flows from it will be deemed unclean and illegitimate. Obviously, this latest failed effort to depose Trump has left the Democrats frustrated, bitterly disappointed . 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 1 minute ago, B-Man said: How Not to Impeach a President by George Parry Original Article With the 51 to 49 vote not to call witnesses, the Senate impeachment trial of President Trump is on track to an acquittal. And so the Trump impeachment saga is coming to an end not with a bang but a whine. “We wuz robbed!” shriek the foot-stomping Democrats as they repeat their poll-tested mantra that the trial was rigged because no witnesses were called to testify. Consequently, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has decreed that the president will remain impeached forever, and his presidency and all that flows from it will be deemed unclean and illegitimate. Obviously, this latest failed effort to depose Trump has left the Democrats frustrated, bitterly disappointed . ...such a pathetic hack azzclown...."we will not accept the impeachment acquittal of President Trump"........gonna sue Schmuck?.........recommend hiring Avenatti as your lead counsel.......
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 (edited) Hmm... 2018: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article214974800.html 2019: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article237959369.html ***************************** Yup. Edited February 1, 2020 by Deranged Rhino 2 1
Bob in Mich Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: Whistle Blower Question: I see you like to push to publicize this whistle blower's name. Do you think doing so could make him or his family a bigger target to some unstable political zealot? Is that really fair or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? I mean even if you think he is a political operative, which I have not seen proven but if he was, should he be put in increased danger? Edited February 1, 2020 by Bob in Mich 1
B-Man Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Question: I see you like to push to publicize this whistle blower's name. Do you think doing so could make him or his family a bigger target to some unstable political zealot? Is that really fair or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? I mean even if you think he is a political operative, which I have not seen proven but if he was, should he be be put in danger? No, I do not. and he does not meet the actual criteria for the category of whistleblower anyway. Quote Two former co-workers said they overheard Ciaramella and Misko, close friends and Democrats, discussing how to “take out,” or remove, the new president from office within days of Trump’s inauguration. These co-workers said the president’s controversial Ukraine phone call in July 2019 provided the pretext they and their Democratic allies had been looking for. “They didn’t like his policies,” another former White House official said. "They had a political vendetta against him from Day One.” 3 1
Foxx Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Question: I see you like to push to publicize this whistle blower's name. Do you think doing so could make him or his family a bigger target to some unstable political zealot? Is that really fair or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? I mean even if you think he is a political operative, which I have not seen proven but if he was, should he be be put in danger? not B-Man, however... Bob, there is considerable question whether he is 'legally' a whistle blower or not. no one should be put in danger but, there deserves to be a fact finding operation to find out the specifics of his motive, his coming forward and who he collaborated with. it is all relevant. he would be in no more danger than other operatives who are being outed for their duplicitous role in the #moderdaywatergate. stop regurgitating the propaganda press talking points, think for yourself, Bob. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 11 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Question: I see you like to push to publicize this whistle blower's name. Do you think doing so could make him or his family a bigger target to some unstable political zealot? Is that really fair or, do you think he and his family should be attacked for being a whistle blower? I mean even if you think he is a political operative, which I have not seen proven but if he was, should he be put in increased danger? There goes Bob again, believing the spin pushed by proven liars and manipulators. I ask Bob, if he's so concerned about the safety of whistleblowers, why was he silent when Nunes was facing death threats for blowing the whistle on the biggest scandal in IC history? 3 1
Albwan Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 (edited) Democrats are so bad they are on the brink of losing their party to socialism. ouch. We've heard it a hundred times. All they had to do was not be god awful. Edited February 1, 2020 by Albwan 1
dubs Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 Can we stop using the dem strategic language and not call Eric C a whistleblower. He’s not. 6
Bob in Mich Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: No, I do not. and he does not meet the actual criteria for the category of whistleblower anyway. No greater danger by publicizing it more? Are you sure? OK, then why are you doing it? What is gained by publicizing him/her? Would you want your name and address exposed even on this board ? There are enough borderline posters here that I think you would be in some greater danger.
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said: No greater danger by publicizing it more? Are you sure? OK, then why are you doing it? What is gained by publicizing him/her? Truth is power, Bob. I know you have a hard time understanding that with as much disinformation as you spew -- but truth is power. Sharing that power is beneficial to the community and the world at large. 2 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Would you want your name and address exposed even on this board ? There are enough borderline posters here that I think you would be in some greater danger. Again, if you care so much about protecting whistleblowers, why were you silent when Nunes was being targeted -- Nunes didn't have the media protecting him, they enabled the targeting, and pig piled on. Bob, you were silent that whole time. Why? Could it be because you're a blind partisan and not truly interested in protecting whistleblowers unless you're ordered to by your masters? Nah. That can't be it... 2 1
Foxx Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: No greater danger by publicizing it more? Are you sure? OK, then why are you doing it? What is gained by publicizing him/her? Would you want your name and address exposed even on this board ? There are enough borderline posters here that I think you would be in some greater danger. your brian truly is broken. you are attempting to equate B-Man with a public figure. just stop would you. you are so far out in the weeds that any semblance with logic is completely void. you're hardly recognizable at this point. Edited February 1, 2020 by Foxx 1
dubs Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 How can someone who is not asserting any direct, first-hand knowledge, all while we actually have transcripts of the conversations the person is purporting to be uncovering, be a whistleblower. Because he filled out a form? 4 2
Bob in Mich Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 13 minutes ago, Foxx said: not B-Man, however... Bob, there is considerable question whether he is 'legally' a whistle blower or not. no one should be put in danger but, there deserves to be a fact finding operation to find out the specifics of his motive, his coming forward and who he collaborated with. it is all relevant. he would be in no more danger than other operatives who are being outed for their duplicitous role in the #moderdaywatergate. stop regurgitating the propaganda press talking points, think for yourself, Bob. Stop with the talking points BS. It is tiring. I give my own opinions on this board as much as anyone and I do think for myself. You don't like my thoughts, fine but they are my opinions. How come if you say something generally agreed to by your side it is OK but if the other side does similar, they read it from the talking points? I recall getting accused of using Elijah Cummings words in a post that I put up about 5 hours before Cummings spoke. Sometime people can see the same situation and come to the same conclusion independently. So your whistle blower point is no one should be put in more danger but this guy probably would be (as much as modern day watergate) and he deserves it. Yeah, and my reasoning skills are faulty. sure thing Foxx 2 1
Albwan Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, dubs said: How can someone who is not asserting any direct, first-hand knowledge, all while we actually have transcripts of the conversations the person is purporting to be uncovering, be a whistleblower. Because he filled out a form? Sounds a lot like the disinformation trolls on ppp
Deranged Rhino Posted February 1, 2020 Posted February 1, 2020 1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said: Stop with the talking points BS. It is tiring. I give my own opinions on this board as much as anyone and I do think for myself. All evidence to the contrary. You are literally spouting talking points -- and have yet to show you're capable of thinking for yourself when that requires you to read/understand information that runs counter to those very talking points you're here to spew. You can prove me wrong though, by answering my question about Nunes and why you were silent about his targeting but so worked up over EC's. Why is that, Bob? Think for yourself before answering... 3 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: You don't like my thoughts, fine but they are my opinions. Thoughts taken right from the MSM spigot... but carry on. 3 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: So your whistle blower point is no one should be put in more danger but this guy probably would be (as much as modern day watergate) and he deserves it. Yeah, and my reasoning skills are faulty. sure thing Foxx Your reasoning skills ARE faulty because you keep thinking he's a whistleblower when he's not. He's part of the plot against the president. 1 1
Recommended Posts