TakeYouToTasker Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 hour ago, John Adams said: So Biden was just a passing thought, even though he was by far the leading Dem candidate at that time and had just splashed onto the scene? Do you REALLY think Trump turned off his brain to the fact that Biden is the guy who plays well to PA and the middle states? I'm not saying this is impeachable, but let's be real. Trump LIVES on TV news and at that point right after Biden announced, the airwaves were filled with Biden. (And I've had to quote the call twice to prove DR embarassingly wrong on things, so yes, I've read it.) Your assertion relies on the notions that: 1) a sitting President does not have the authority to set and conduct foreign policy 2) a President does not have the authority to place pressure on other governments to participate in corruption probes which reach across the borders of both nations 3) running for high office is a de facto insulator against being investigated for crimes because it harms electoral chances (an assertion that there should be a tiered justice system) 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 hour ago, John Adams said: Do your best not to be a douche. Refusal to answer a simple yes and no question and then resorting to name calling is not very becoming. Not surprising but unbecoming. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 Presidents can't extort foreign leaders to try and hurt a political opponent. You Trumpets understand that. You just can't emotionally accept it yet. Emotional thinkers are very susceptible to lying executives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Presidents can't extort foreign leaders to try and hurt a political opponent. You Trumpets understand that. You just can't emotionally accept it yet. Emotional thinkers are very susceptible to lying executives. For God's sake look in the mirror when you make such statements. Facing reality is the first step towards becoming an emotionally balanced adult. Your mom will thank you for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 Just now, RochesterRob said: For God's sake look in the mirror when you make such statements. Facing reality is the first step towards becoming an emotionally balanced adult. Your mom will thank you for it. You don't consider Trump a pathological liar, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 44 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Fake news? No, that would be you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, westside2 said: No, that would be you I'm not fake! Im the real deal! Edited October 2, 2019 by Tiberius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 46 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Fake news? Treaty document 106-16 Look it up. Signed September 30, 1999 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, westside2 said: Treaty document 106-16 Look it up. Signed September 30, 1999 You better call Nancy Pelosi up before she impeached that bum, then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: You better call Nancy Pelosi up before she impeached that bum, then! Impeach him for what? There was no crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, westside2 said: Impeach him for what? There was no crime. Extortion is a high crime. We don't want foreigners directly interfering in our elections again. It's our Republic, not Trumps toy to play with as he sees fit. I believe he violated the corrupt foreign practices act, too. That's a real law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Extortion is a high crime. We don't want foreigners directly interfering in our elections again. It's our Republic, not Trumps toy to play with as he sees fit. I believe he violated the corrupt foreign practices act, too. That's a real law. You can talk till your blue in the face. There was not any hint of extortion from that phone call. The liberal left must have a serious reading disability if they see that in the transcript. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Extortion is a high crime. Think of them as sanctions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 hour ago, John Adams said: Do your best not to be a douche. We really need to spell this out like 2nd graders? Crowdstrike server and investigate Bidens. Did the Crowdstrike server and Joe Biden get mentioned at the same time? Which got mentioned first and in conjunction with "a favor"? If they weren't mentioned at the same time, how much conversation happened between the time they were individually brought up? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Think of them as sanctions. In exchange for opening a fraudulent investigation? 9 minutes ago, westside2 said: You can talk till your blue in the face. There was not any hint of extortion from that phone call. The liberal left must have a serious reading disability if they see that in the transcript. But I need a favor... thats a bit more than a hint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Did the Crowdstrike server and Joe Biden get mentioned at the same time? Which got mentioned first and in conjunction with "a favor"? If they weren't mentioned at the same time, how much conversation happened between the time they were individually brought up? 500+ words. Which, in Trump's rambling style, could cover several topic changes. But details and facts are irrelevant when you've been programmed to parrot a narrative without stopping to think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: In exchange for opening a fraudulent investigation? But I need a favor... thats a bit more than a hint Try using that in a court of law. They would laugh you out of the courtroom. Besides, the treaty Bill Clinton signed gives the president the right to help uncover corruption. There is no law broken. 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: 500+ words. Which, in Trump's rambling style, could cover several topic changes. But details and facts are irrelevant when you've been programmed to parrot a narrative without stopping to think about it. Reminds me of the ending of the movie "And Justice for All" starring Al Pacino. The left is so eager to impeach Trump, they forgot to find a crime he committed to get impeached. Great movie if you never saw it. I highly recommend it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 17 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Think of them as sanctions. Call it a tax and the Dems will fully support it, or at least say the tax needs to be higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 2, 2019 Author Share Posted October 2, 2019 10 minutes ago, westside2 said: Try using that in a court of law. They would laugh you out of the courtroom. Besides, the treaty Bill Clinton signed gives the president the right to help uncover corruption. There is no law broken. Reminds me of the ending of the movie "And Justice for All" starring Al Pacino. The left is so eager to impeach Trump, they forgot to find a crime he committed to get impeached. Great movie if you never saw it. I highly recommend it. Congress isn't a court of law, the courts are awaiting Trump for when he leaves office. Stormy hush money was a crime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westside Posted October 2, 2019 Share Posted October 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Congress isn't a court of law, the courts are awaiting Trump for when he leaves office. Stormy hush money was a crime I actually wish they would vote on impeachment. That would open a bunch of doors for the Republicans to subpoena the traitors and liars and thieves on the left to be questioned under oath. They will never vote to impeach because they know what a pandora box they would open. It's all a show. All flash no substance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts