Jump to content

Bear Cam is back


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

Nice try CC. 

 

Not clicking that link. Try this one. https://images.app.goo.gl/ro8jopVGToREqUZL6

 

 

Thanx for the link... I didn't exactly get the bear... But instead, the Shawn Mendes life sized cut out is arriving on Tuesday!

 

You're the best Fergy... I take back all those questionable things I may have said about you.

 

 

 

 

 

[Does anybody know who Shawn Mendes is?]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Thanx for the link... I didn't exactly get the bear... But instead, the Shawn Mendes life sized cut out is arriving on Tuesday!

 

You're the best Fergy... I take back all those questionable things I may have said about you.

 

 

 

 

 

[Does anybody know who Shawn Mendes is?]

No..but I bet you will tell us and it will be unbearable

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Italian forest rangers on the hunt of 'escape genius' bear
 
It’s not clear how the bear got past an electrified fence, then scaled a nearly 4-meter (13-foot) high barrier. Days earlier, the bear had been captured by forest rangers after attacks on livestock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BringBackFergy said:

Does anyone with a vested interest in this thread care to tell @mead107 he’s watching re-runs from the Brooks Falls bears of 2016 or should we just let him keep busy?

 

@ExiledInIllinois? @Mike in Horseheads

I've done all I can here. As Pontius Pilot said " I wash my hands of this thread"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cripple Creek said:

Send the count to @ExiledInIllinois. He and his buddies will have that river damned up and dead in no time flat. Disrupting the natural flow of water (and life) is what they live for.

Don't cherry pick.  You can't have it both ways.  I agree we are disrupting flow. Your, post above only applies to low water Lake events.  That was 5-15 years ago.

 

But... The natural flow is also the way it is going now! Wrap your brain around that.  The natural flow is BOTH WAYS. Remember, Lake is at record high... If left alone, it would be spilling over and going in the direction we have it now!... The fish would have an open door to Lake Michigan.

 

At least now... We are legitimately blocking Mutha Nature from allowing the Asian carp to enter.

 

Do you want Asian carp in Lake?  If there was no dam there, Mutha Nature would be putting the fish in the Lakes faster.

 

Really... The whole @BringBackFergy @Gugny "let the rivers flow" argument would speed up the invasion.

 

Can't have it both ways... Not just cherry pick at low water. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

Don't cherry pick.  You can't have it both ways.  I agree we are disrupting flow. Your, post above only applies to low water Lake events.  That was 5-15 years ago.

 

But... The natural flow is also the way it is going now! Wrap your brain around that.  The natural flow is BOTH WAYS. Remember, Lake is at record high... If left alone, it would be spilling over and going in the direction we have it now!... The fish would have an open door to Lake Michigan.

 

At least now... We are legitimately blocking Mutha Nature from allowing the Asian carp to enter.

 

Do you want Asian carp in Lake?  If there was no dam there, Mutha Nature would be putting the fish in the Lakes faster.

 

Really... The whole @BringBackFergy @Gugny "let the rivers flow" argument would speed up the invasion.

 

Can't have it both ways... Not just cherry pick at low water. 

 

Do I want Asian Carp in the lake? Hell no!! But your brethren locktenders in the lower river obviously were too busy playing Pokémon on their phones as the invasion occurred. Thanks. 

 

“Hello, I’m with the government and I’m here to help”. SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BringBackFergy said:

Do I want Asian Carp in the lake? Hell no!! But your brethren locktenders in the lower river obviously were too busy playing Pokémon on their phones as the invasion occurred. Thanks. 

 

“Hello, I’m with the government and I’m here to help”. SMH

There is no invasion.  It's a government boondoggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

There is no invasion.  It's a government boondoggle.

Technically you’re correct. It’s hard to call it an invasion when you and your gang sent invitations and rolled out the red carpet.

 

Still, the question as to why your organization, under the mantle of national security, has secreted countless species into both the contiguous and non-contiguous parts of this Blessed Union goes unanswered.

 

If Planned Parenthood had the success rate of your beloved COE they would not be today sitting squarely in the crosshairs of your man POTUS and other right wingnuts.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cripple Creek said:

Technically you’re correct. It’s hard to call it an invasion when you and your gang sent invitations and rolled out the red carpet.

 

Still, the question as to why your organization, under the mantle of national security, has secreted countless species into both the contiguous and non-contiguous parts of this Blessed Union goes unanswered.

 

If Planned Parenthood had the success rate of your beloved COE they would not be today sitting squarely in the crosshairs of your man POTUS and other right wingnuts.

We know we lost the Battle of Bunker Hill... The birth of the Corps before that battle had proved to the British that the Colonists shouldn't be taken lightly even out manned and out gunned. The British suffered losses almost 3x as many men with a force that was 1/3 greater. The victory rang hollow.

 

ESSAYONS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...