Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: "This is all about Hillary's email again!" He's more prescient than he realizes -- but because he's so blisteringly dumb, he fails to see how that's REAL BAD for his side of the aisle. It's his staff (or the committee's dem staff rather) Where'd his staff get the letter? Did Barr just invent a new word: "acknowledgize?" 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeginnersMind Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Shocking...Durban is quoting a letter that went public less than 24 hours ago to impeach Barr's interpretation of the report. That should narrow down the leak - who's Durban working with? It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: LOL Durbin trying to recharacterize that letter... No, he's characterizing the letter exactly as the Post and NYT characterized it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Where'd his staff get the letter? That's what I'd like to know... I'm sure we will learn that answer in the coming weeks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, BeginnersMind said: It’s not an OC-length letter. Probably only 3 sentences relevant. It's the timing, not the content. It's not even a subtle set-up: Post and NYT break the news with a headline, set the narrative, push it in their morning editions, then Durban makes it the focus of his first question. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Durbin...'i don't like your response so i'm going to choose to believe...'. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Boom! lol, Those darn emails Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: Boom! lol, Those darn emails "We just might do that..." 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Dick: "After we take another look at Hillary Clinton's emails" Lindsay: "We might do that" Barr: {grin} LMAO 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 None that you are aware of? Oh bull, the Trump Towers meeting before the media reported it was something to hold over the president. His kissing up to Putin is suspicious looking to say the least 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Now Mike Lee is up. He's also pounding the same things, Clinton, FISA warrants, etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Posting for the image not the meme -- but that was his expression as Feinstein read her (Chinese approved) talking points. Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Oh, he doesn't know? What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Just now, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said: Has SNL gotten John Goodman to play Barr yet? Oh, that would be a good one. Same jowls. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 That was a VERY interesting answer by Barr. He said people assume the only intelligence collection was done by one FISA (on Page) and one informant. He thinks there was more and is looking into it. There was more. It was illegal, Barr knows it. And it's going to come out. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 "FISA issue currently underway by the OIG" 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 Barr says he doesn't want to talk too deeply about FISA because of the ongoing OIG investigation. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: "FISA issue currently underway by the OIG" the findings can't comes soon enough. break after Whitehouse. good, i'm hungry! Edited May 1, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts