Jump to content

Why do new coaches overhaul rosters?


major

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, major said:

Heard today that Jon Gruden has a two year plan to completely overhaul the raiders roster to bring in his own players. Why do coaches do this (our own included)? I’ve seen this done in my profession as well and it rarely works. I know some answers will revolve around new schemes and new players. But it seems to be more of an ego trip, in my opinion. So why do you think they do this? 

Ego they feel they have their own successful system and that's the way it goes  ..the great coaches don't do this tho...Belichick won the superbowl with Parcells players + Brady ..the opposite Chip Kelly traded away great talent from Eagles and failed ..its a red flag to Me if a coach wants too much power off the bat unless their established serial winners like Belichick or Andy Reid . Mcdermott/Beane  created more holes on this roster due to ego.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

Most people (and in this case, football coaches) aren't very creative/adaptable.  Belichick has proven over and over that he's one of the few that can adapt his systems to the players he has available.  Wade was able to do it with his defenses.

 

I remember them talking to Brian Cox about his stint with the Patriots.  Belichick KNEW Cox couldn't cover a bed in man-to-man, so he used him almost exclusively on running downs and either blitzed him or had him play a soft zone on the passing plays he was on the field for.

 

There was a great article on Sean McVay before he ever coached a game.  He has basically turned the NFL on its collective head because he refuses to adhere to the old norms.  The Rams are finally playing to the talent level of that roster because of it.

 

Common denominator:  having a QB makes them look a whole lot more like geniuses...

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MAJBobby said:

Because Old School cosches are set in their ways and know nothing else. 

 

You notice McVay didnt sell off the Roster in LA, Nagy in Chi

 

McVay didn't have to, that team was loaded. From years of high draft picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

No not all.  

 

It it all depends on who they inherit.  

 

 

Notice the ONLY ones that due tend to be fired rather quickly 

41 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

McVay didn't have to, that team was loaded. From years of high draft picks. 

 

Notice the Only ones that go in. Clean house are the ones that tend to be fired rather quickly after getting hired 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Notice the ONLY ones that due tend to be fired rather quickly 

 

Notice the Only ones that go in. Clean house are the ones that tend to be fired rather quickly after getting hired 

 

because people like you have 0 patience. Give him another offseason, and if they still have a basement offense, then we will talk. 

Edited by BillsEnthusiast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

because people like you have 0 patience. 

 

So you mean like Pro Sport. You win or get replaced. 

 

 

What has McD done to earn patience?

 

7 blowouts in 1.5 seasons?

Edited by MAJBobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Binghamton Beast said:

Because the players they inherited don’t fit their schemes?

 

 

This is true in foitball all to a limit.

 

the biggest area is a 3-4 or 4-3 front defense where you see a change of personnel.  

 

This is was part of the problem in buffalos playoff drought.  They kept flipping back and forth.  The big example was in Gailey hiring. Had he not been nepotistic and hire his friend who was a 3-4 person and instead kept it 4-3 buffalo probably makes the playoffs because they had p,layoff defense talent.  

 

You font don’t generally see thus in other sports when new coaches are hired.

 

sometimes new GM and coaches don’t keep players because they weren’t their investment so if they do well the credit won’t go to the gm.

 

you see this in areas of corporations that are investing in new ideas or inventions.  A new manager hired changes priorities.  If a new manager is hired after a scandal or disaster the new person needs to focus first on this reason which financial impacts other areas like with budget cuts or job layoffs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

Thank you Andy Dalton. 

 

Marrone would have done the same with some miracle tie breaker. 

 

You have to get your team in position for the tiebreaker in the first place. Am I the only one seeing This?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Binghamton Beast said:

Because the players they inherited don’t fit their schemes?

 

...but don't the good ones adjust their schemes to fit the personnel they have to work with?....Schwartz did it with good results....didn't we waste two years with Trainwrecks because he needed "his guys"?...........how much time can we afford to let McClappy waste because he needs "his guys" and they must fit "the process", whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.....seriously beginning to hate that damn word...........

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillsEnthusiast said:

 

You have to get your team in position for the tiebreaker in the first place. Am I the only one seeing This?

 

Again Marrone did it in 2014. What is your point 9-7. Been done here a couple times and just didnt get the Miracle McD did 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, major said:

Heard today that Jon Gruden has a two year plan to completely overhaul the raiders roster to bring in his own players. Why do coaches do this (our own included)? I’ve seen this done in my profession as well and it rarely works. I know some answers will revolve around new schemes and new players. But it seems to be more of an ego trip, in my opinion. So why do you think they do this? 

 

Something tells me this is a rhetorical question, but I'll bite anyway.

 

Short answer?  It's easier.  It's easier for coaches to identify the kinds of players they think will best execute their concepts than it is to modify those concepts to match the players currently on the roster.  Adaptive coaches are rare, and there are only too many who are willing to rest on the laurels of schemes that may have won them games in the past, but are now either outdated or a bad match for their current personnel.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Notice the ONLY ones that due tend to be fired rather quickly 

 

Notice the Only ones that go in. Clean house are the ones that tend to be fired rather quickly after getting hired 

Not necessarily.   Some succeed some fail. 

 

Unfortunately for Buffalo it hasn’t worked out for the past 3 or more HC’s 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...