Won't anyone think of the poor, sensitive Lawful Gun Owner?

[boyst]

On 3/2/2018 at 3:05 PM, LA Grant said:

 

HAHAHAHA. You're done, b*tch. Topic is gun control. Has been for 25 pages. 

 

If you have something to offer besides "making it all about you," you lonely ass fool, then put it out there. Unless you're an "intellectual coward," you should have no issue making whatever point you're trying to make. 

 

If you can't contribute to the conversation without me going into another of your rabbit holes, then spare us, Tasker. Said it before, will say it again, I'm not interested in any more of your holes. They're dark, smelly, and unproductive.

 

If you ain't gonna contribute, then go ahead & take a bow, because we've seen all of your "TakeYouToTactics" and now the show is over. Curtains. Done. Learn a new routine before you sign up again.

you sure do talk like you're some big loudmouth tough guy, you don't need to.  even if what you're saying is something reaosnable or intelligent it is unneeded and only makes you look like a sore pathetic looser.

 

try toning that down in your arguments and if it makes you feel better don't stoop to their level, though, no one is being like you are with the bravado.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

Why the Left Won’t Win the Gun-Control Debate

It’s too hard to persuade people to willingly surrender the right to protect their own lives.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/gun-control-debate-liberals-wont-win-heres-why/

 

 

 

Edited March 7, 2018 by Deranged Rhino

[boyst]

 

Quote

 

(CNN) 

A University of Pennsylvania researching student group found gun violence has fallen in the last year despite more guns being owned.  Per their blog post on Monday, gun violence has been declining over the last several decades, as well.  Mass shootings were also on the decline. 

...

The research group concluded that more attention on gun crime has fueled interest in gun control by advocacy groups though overall crime is down, per the Federal Bureau of Investigation website statistics.

 

 

more at CNN.com

 

 

What will Gary, Grant and others say to this?  Pretty much sums it up with the above.

[Koko78]

Well, as the man once said:

 

Quote

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

 

[DC Tom]

55 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

 

 

What will Gary, Grant and others say to this?  Pretty much sums it up with the above.

 

"Fake news."

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a Republican NRA shill!"

"Even one gun death is too many."

"Think of the children!"

"We don't want to ban all guns.  Just assault-style guns."

"I'm a rational, independent thinker, and these links describe my feelings on the matter."

"Double dumbass on you!"

[boyst]

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

"Fake news."

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a Republican NRA shill!"

"Even one gun death is too many."

"Think of the children!"

"We don't want to ban all guns.  Just assault-style guns."

"I'm a rational, independent thinker, and these links describe my feelings on the matter."

"Double dumbass on you!"

they don't even read ****, Grant doesn't read anything, he just looks for the opportunity to blather off at the vent hole to espouse us in his emotional #feels.

[Paulus]

18 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

I watch a game in a sports bar a few times a year, usually when on the road for travel or business.

 

you judge there is something horribly wrong with this?

 

it’s what men who watch sports do, maybe you can be one when you grow up?

 

Yeah, there is something special about going to a bar to just relax without others. It is cathartic to just forget the world and relax, while watching the ponies or a game, for me at least. 

[Azalin]

52 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Yeah, there is something special about going to a bar to just relax without others. It is cathartic to just forget the world and relax, while watching the ponies or a game, for me at least. 

 

Same here. Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[row_33]

1 hour ago, Paulus said:

Yeah, there is something special about going to a bar to just relax without others. It is cathartic to just forget the world and relax, while watching the ponies or a game, for me at least. 

 

Sorry that the snowflakes on here can’t walk into a sports bar on their own...

 

[LA Grant]

 

9 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

(CNN) 

A University of Pennsylvania researching student group found gun violence has fallen in the last year despite more guns being owned.  Per their blog post on Monday, gun violence has been declining over the last several decades, as well.  Mass shootings were also on the decline. 

...

The research group concluded that more attention on gun crime has fueled interest in gun control by advocacy groups though overall crime is down, per the Federal Bureau of Investigation website statistics.

 

 

more at CNN.com

 

What will Gary, Grant and others say to this?  Pretty much sums it up with the above.

 

LOL, I would say that you need to verify your sources. Neither of those links take you to a CNN article. One takes you to a blog about how to cook asparagus. The other takes you to beehive.bumble.com. Googling the copy does not produce a CNN article. Searching keywords on CNN also does not produce this article.

 

Is there actually a CNN article? Or did you just see this posted somewhere and assume it must be true?

 

8 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

I don't even read ****, I don't read anything, I just look for the opportunity to blather off at the vent hole to espouse us in my emotional #feels.

 

FTFY, dumbass.

 

Quote

 

you sure do talk like you're some big loudmouth tough guy, you don't need to.  even if what you're saying is something reaosnable or intelligent it is unneeded and only makes you look like a sore pathetic looser.

 

try toning that down in your arguments and if it makes you feel better don't stoop to their level, though, no one is being like you are with the bravado.

 

 

That's cute. I'll make a deal. If you'd like to bring the conversation to a less aggressive tone, I'll meet you there. All you need to do is apologize for being wrong, dishonest, dishonorable, and irresponsible. 

 

8 hours ago, DC Tom said:

"Fake news."

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a Republican NRA shill!"

"Even one gun death is too many."

"Think of the children!"

"We don't want to ban all guns.  Just assault-style guns."

"I'm a rational, independent thinker, and these links describe my feelings on the matter."

"Double dumbass on you!"

 

You're an idiot. 

 

10 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Still waiting for you to stop putting words in people's mouths and arguing against positions no one ever took. 

 

But that requires you to have more than a two cylinder brain in your skull. You've proven you lack in that department for weeks now. 

 

Seems like I struck a nerve by simply asking you to defend the Federalist article you posted. I pointed out a reason to be skeptical of it, since you had previously mentioned the importance of being skeptical of the NY Times. You said I misinterpreted it. All of the top commenters of the article interpreted it the same way I did. You insist that you are somehow having words put in your mouth.

 

I want to help you, Rhino, but y'know, maybe I don't know enough about you. Do you have support in your life? A wife or girlfriend/partner of at least one year? You asked me two invasive personal questions in our discussions the last two weeks, so please allow me the same fair & balanced opportunity.

 

As with your questions, I need to know before I decide if it's worth continuing this. If you feel uncomfortable answering, as I did with your questions, don't worry — I will use your exact same method of badgering non-stop until you provide us with an answer.

Edited March 7, 2018 by LA Grant

[LA Grant]

5 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Why the Left Won’t Win the Gun-Control Debate

It’s too hard to persuade people to willingly surrender the right to protect their own lives.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/gun-control-debate-liberals-wont-win-heres-why/

 

How in the world do posters on this board think you are liberal?? All I have seen from you in the last two weeks are links to op-eds from the ghost of Billy Buckley & links from the blog of the plagiarist that couldn't hack it for 3 days at WaPo. Not to mention you're the main author of the 1000 page Tom Clancy fan-fiction book club bukkake.

 

Good lord, if you're liberal relative to the rest of PPP, is everyone else to the right of Goebbels, or seriously wtf?

Edited March 7, 2018 by LA Grant

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, LA Grant said:

 

How in the world do posters on this board think you are liberal?? All I have seen from you in the last two weeks are links are to op-eds from the ghost of Billy Buckley & links from the blog of the plagiarist that couldn't hack it for 3 days at WaPo. Not to mention you're the main author of the 1000 page Tom Clancy fan-fiction book club bukkake.

 

Good lord, if you're liberal relative to the rest of PPP, is everyone else to the right of Goebbels, or seriously wtf?

Maybe I can give you a little perspective. Greg, who works in a liberal industry (to say the least) is a socially conscience kind of guy. He would never protest you and your guy getting married or anything else along that line. In fact he might even bake youin's a cake. He is what we call a guy who believes in the Constitution and is very protective of those rights. He's also a guy that has had to do a fair amount of research to actually do his job. He knows how to do this. His ability to do the research and his strong sense of the Constitution and his spidey sense that there was much wrong in the last two/twenty years led to his research and posting here. You should probably back off and wait for the results.

[LA Grant]

3 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

Maybe I can give you a little perspective. Greg, who works in a liberal industry (to say the least) is a socially conscience kind of guy. He would never protest you and your guy getting married or anything else along that line. In fact he might even bake youin's a cake. He is what we call a guy who believes in the Constitution and is very protective of those rights. He's also a guy that has had to do a fair amount of research to actually do his job. He knows how to do this. His ability to do the research and his strong sense of the Constitution and his spidey sense that there was much wrong in the last two/twenty years led to his research and posting here. You should probably back off and wait for the results.

 

So anything left of "homophobe" is considered "liberal" on PPP... got it.  I suppose "conservative on all issues but doesn't say the N word in public" is what qualifies as "independent" here, too; that would explain some of the strange self-identities. Similarly, your insinuation of gay as pejorative is sad but whatever. It's just funny that Rhino would be considered "liberal" since his overall views make him the left version of a RINO. Ha, it almost fits the screen name: a deranged RINO.

 

If his posts here are indicative of the research he does for work, that is concerning. I wouldn't trust Greg to research a snowcone without coming back with some conspiracy on fluoride.

 

Still, I do like your manner of sticking up for him. It's kinda sweet in a little brother kind of way. Maybe I should back off. Certainly, I agree I should stop posting here. As fun as it is to dunk on fools, and this page alone shows how easy some of y'all make it, it's still a pretty bad habit to gaze into the abyss this long.

 

Well done, 3rdnIng, your post did provide a little perspective. I see that I'm trying to talk policy with a bunch of versions of this guy:

 

 

Edited March 7, 2018 by LA Grant

[boyst]

4 hours ago, LA Grant said:

 

 

LOL, I would say that you need to verify your sources. Neither of those links take you to a CNN article. One takes you to a blog about how to cook asparagus. The other takes you to beehive.bumble.com. Googling the copy does not produce a CNN article. Searching keywords on CNN also does not produce this article.

 

Is there actually a CNN article? Or did you just see this posted somewhere and assume it must be true?

 

 

FTFY, dumbass.

 

 

That's cute. I'll make a deal. If you'd like to bring the conversation to a less aggressive tone, I'll meet you there. All you need to do is apologize for being wrong, dishonest, dishonorable, and irresponsible. 

 

 

You're an idiot. 

 

 

Seems like I struck a nerve by simply asking you to defend the Federalist article you posted. I pointed out a reason to be skeptical of it, since you had previously mentioned the importance of being skeptical of the NY Times. You said I misinterpreted it. All of the top commenters of the article interpreted it the same way I did. You insist that you are somehow having words put in your mouth.

 

I want to help you, Rhino, but y'know, maybe I don't know enough about you. Do you have support in your life? A wife or girlfriend/partner of at least one year? You asked me two invasive personal questions in our discussions the last two weeks, so please allow me the same fair & balanced opportunity.

 

As with your questions, I need to know before I decide if it's worth continuing this. If you feel uncomfortable answering, as I did with your questions, don't worry — I will use your exact same method of badgering non-stop until you provide us with an answer.

I was proving a point, and I've done it several times once you fell for it. I've gotten several fall for deer by just typing whatever the hell I want making it look like it's a quote to some article and linking something ridiculous.

 

If you can't tell I don't take this place too seriously because it's either a or b. A mix of bravado that either knows nothing that they talk about or those that are on the other side of the net just spiking it right back down the other person's throat because they're a freaking fool

[3rdnlng]

3 hours ago, LA Grant said:

 

So anything left of "homophobe" is considered "liberal" on PPP... got it.  I suppose "conservative on all issues but doesn't say the N word in public" is what qualifies as "independent" here, too; that would explain some of the strange self-identities. Similarly, your insinuation of gay as pejorative is sad but whatever. It's just funny that Rhino would be considered "liberal" since his overall views make him the left version of a RINO. Ha, it almost fits the screen name: a deranged RINO.

 

If his posts here are indicative of the research he does for work, that is concerning. I wouldn't trust Greg to research a snowcone without coming back with some conspiracy on fluoride.

 

Still, I do like your manner of sticking up for him. It's kinda sweet in a little brother kind of way. Maybe I should back off. Certainly, I agree I should stop posting here. As fun as it is to dunk on fools, and this page alone shows how easy some of y'all make it, it's still a pretty bad habit to gaze into the abyss this long.

 

Well done, 3rdnIng, your post did provide a little perspective. I see that I'm trying to talk policy with a bunch of versions of this guy:

 

 

Wow. So sensitive. I was using the gay marriage and cake baking as an example. I didn't know I would strike such a chord. Regardless, this isn't about your gayness, non gayness or propensity to fantasize. This was about conveying to you that Greg, who is a liberal in many areas, has a true calling when it comes to constitutional matters. He has researched and reported here for over a year regarding what he has found. You, on the other hand sashay in here and attempt to ridicule him based on all of the lengthy research he has done that you haven't read. Congratulations! You have lived up to all of our expectations and not only have a lock on our Blowhard of The Year award but are the frontrunner for Asswhole's United presidency.

[row_33]

So the bakers have collectively stated that any further enforced work by the courts will result in a large ad in the local newspaper advising that the proceeds from the cake of the blessed union will be denoted to the local Crisis Pregnancy Center.  Brilliant!!! 

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

[Cinga]

10 hours ago, LA Grant said:

 

How in the world do posters on this board think you are liberal?? All I have seen from you in the last two weeks are links to op-eds from the ghost of Billy Buckley & links from the blog of the plagiarist that couldn't hack it for 3 days at WaPo. Not to mention you're the main author of the 1000 page Tom Clancy fan-fiction book club bukkake.

 

Good lord, if you're liberal relative to the rest of PPP, is everyone else to the right of Goebbels, or seriously wtf?

In your mind, liberals are all willing to give up their Constitutional Rights for more government control huh? Never occurred to you some might like those Rights?

 

And Goebbels was a member of the National Socialist German Workers Party.  The whole fallback on calling people Nazis is old and boring especially when it is your own beliefs and party closest to what they stood for

 

I've stood aside and watched you make an a55 of yourself on here, but you really are some special kind of stupid aren't you?

[row_33]

11 minutes ago, Cinga said:

In your mind, liberals are all willing to give up their Constitutional Rights for more government control huh? Never occurred to you some might like those Rights?

 

And Goebbels was a member of the National Socialist German Workers Party.  The whole fallback on calling people Nazis is old and boring especially when it is your own beliefs and party closest to what they stood for

 

I've stood aside and watched you make an a55 of yourself on here, but you really are some special kind of stupid aren't you?

 

nazis ruined political chat by calling themselves both nationalists and socialists and democratic worker

 

term now means you like a different ice cream flavour than a liberal

[Deranged Rhino]

16 minutes ago, Cinga said:

In your mind, liberals are all willing to give up their Constitutional Rights for more government control huh? Never occurred to you some might like those Rights?

 

And Goebbels was a member of the National Socialist German Workers Party.  The whole fallback on calling people Nazis is old and boring especially when it is your own beliefs and party closest to what they stood for

 

I've stood aside and watched you make an a55 of yourself on here, but you really are some special kind of stupid aren't you?

 

He is. He's a fascist who thinks himself a progressive. The most dangerous kind of useful idiot. The kind who doesn't have any sense of history, or what liberalism actually means in a philosophical and historical context. 

 

True liberals believe in liberty of the individual over the tyranny of the state and the mob. 

 

True liberals believe in and understand the import of freedom of speech, thought, the right to privacy privacy, due process, and self defense. 

 

True liberals understand the import of these inalienable rights because they have a grasp of history which shows, unequivocally, that if left unchecked the natural evolution of the State trends towards oppression and tyranny. Thus being a true liberal requires vigilance to guard against governmental over-reach - not the forfeiture of the very inalienable rights liberal philosophers gave their lives to birth during the enlightenment and which were finally codified in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. 

 

This republic is one of mankind's greatest achievements. It's an achievement of liberal thought and ideals in the true definition of the philosophy. Defending it does not remove one's liberal credentials. It bolsters it. 

 

That's something Grant fails to understand because he's ignorant of history, ignorant of philosophy, and has the intellectual capacity of a thimble. Grant's a fascist who thinks himself a progressive. Rather than contemplate the truth in that statement, he'll be back here with a blathering diatribe which will only prove my point. 

Edited March 7, 2018 by Deranged Rhino