grinreaper Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Tiberius linkedIn page: Occupation: Full-time conspiracy dude on 2BD board. Post 1,400 times a week on Trump's upcoming doom. Drip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Tiberius linkedIn page: Occupation: Full-time conspiracy dude on 2BD board. Post 1,400 times a week on Trump's upcoming doom and laundromat attendant. You forgot the last part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 That would be too good, Trump has to be declared worse than Hitler for these folks.... It's quite comical, they could be living a real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 SESSIONS’ TESTIMONY SHOULD REVEAL ABSURDITY OF “RUSSIA INVESTIGATION”by John Hindraker Tomorrow afternoon Attorney General Jeff Sessions will testify publicly, and I assume on television, before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The Associated Press previews Sessions’ appearance as though it were a cage match, but I am pretty sure it will be anticlimactic, if not embarrassing, for the Democrats. Because it will raise, in bald form, the question: what the heck are you investigating? The AP writes: The hearing will bring sharp questioning for Sessions and likely some uncomfortable moments from [ sic] the Trump administration. I doubt that. Sessions is likely to be asked about his conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and whether there were more encounters that should have been made public. The same Russian Ambassador whom the Democrats invited to sit with them for President Trump’s first address to a joint session of Congress? The idea that it is somehow suspicious for Jeff Sessions, or anyone else, to talk with the Russian Ambassador, apparently the Democrats’ best friend, is absurd. Talking to people is what ambassadors do. Well, the Democrats may ask, what did you talk about? I have no idea, but I can say with absolute certainty that Sessions’ answer will not be: we discussed what a great idea it would be for Russian hackers to spearfish credulous Democratic Party staffers so as to get access to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s email account, which could then be passed on to WikiLeaks. Because who knows, it might contain emails showing that the Democrats had a whole bunch of superdelegates, a principal purpose of which was to make sure that Hillary Clinton won the nomination–something that everyone who pays any attention to politics already knew. This whole “investigation” is a farce. As Mark Steyn writes: As everyone more sentient than an earthworm should know by now, “the Russia investigation” is Deep State dinner-theatre. I wrote a while back that, in today’s Hollywood, what Hitchcock used to call “the MacGuffin” – the pretext that sets the caper afoot, the secret papers, the microfilm – has degenerated into a MacNuffin: there’s no longer even a pretense that these stories are about anything. The “Russia investigation” is the ne plus ultra of MacNuffins, so smoothly transferred from Los Angeles to Washington that one vaguely suspects some studio vice-prez who bundled for Hillary came up with the idea as a reality-show pilot that accidentally bust out of the laboratory. The idea that Jeff Sessions had something to do with a spearfishing expedition into the DNC’s email server (the Russians, if they were Russians, tried the same thing with the RNC, but the Republicans weren’t dumb enough to fall for it) is ridiculous. No one believes it, not even the most rabid Democrat. To say that there is no evidence to suggest any such thing is an understatement. No doubt CNN, the New York Times and the Washington Times will pretend to find something “troubling” in Sessions’s testimony tomorrow, no matter what he says. But it is becoming increasingly obvious to any sane person that with regard to the “Russian investigation,” there is nothing to investigate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Sessions is likely to be asked about his conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and whether there were more encounters that should have been made public. The !@#$? How's that supposed to work? "Were there any other meetings you've lied about...and keep in mind, this time you can't cross your fingers!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinreaper Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 SESSIONS’ TESTIMONY SHOULD REVEAL ABSURDITY OF “RUSSIA INVESTIGATION” by John Hindraker Tomorrow afternoon Attorney General Jeff Sessions will testify publicly, and I assume on television, before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The Associated Press previews Sessions’ appearance as though it were a cage match, but I am pretty sure it will be anticlimactic, if not embarrassing, for the Democrats. Because it will raise, in bald form, the question: what the heck are you investigating? The AP writes: I doubt that. The hearing will bring sharp questioning for Sessions and likely some uncomfortable moments from [sic] the Trump administration. The same Russian Ambassador whom the Democrats invited to sit with them for President Trump’s first address to a joint session of Congress? Sessions is likely to be asked about his conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and whether there were more encounters that should have been made public. The idea that it is somehow suspicious for Jeff Sessions, or anyone else, to talk with the Russian Ambassador, apparently the Democrats’ best friend, is absurd. Talking to people is what ambassadors do. Well, the Democrats may ask, what did you talk about? I have no idea, but I can say with absolute certainty that Sessions’ answer will not be: we discussed what a great idea it would be for Russian hackers to spearfish credulous Democratic Party staffers so as to get access to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s email account, which could then be passed on to WikiLeaks. Because who knows, it might contain emails showing that the Democrats had a whole bunch of superdelegates, a principal purpose of which was to make sure that Hillary Clinton won the nomination–something that everyone who pays any attention to politics already knew. This whole “investigation” is a farce. As Mark Steyn writes: As everyone more sentient than an earthworm should know by now, “the Russia investigation” is Deep State dinner-theatre. I wrote a while back that, in today’s Hollywood, what Hitchcock used to call “the MacGuffin” – the pretext that sets the caper afoot, the secret papers, the microfilm – has degenerated into a MacNuffin: there’s no longer even a pretense that these stories are about anything. The “Russia investigation” is the ne plus ultra of MacNuffins, so smoothly transferred from Los Angeles to Washington that one vaguely suspects some studio vice-prez who bundled for Hillary came up with the idea as a reality-show pilot that accidentally bust out of the laboratory. The idea that Jeff Sessions had something to do with a spearfishing expedition into the DNC’s email server (the Russians, if they were Russians, tried the same thing with the RNC, but the Republicans weren’t dumb enough to fall for it) is ridiculous. No one believes it, not even the most rabid Democrat. To say that there is no evidence to suggest any such thing is an understatement. No doubt CNN, the New York Times and the Washington Times will pretend to find something “troubling” in Sessions’s testimony tomorrow, no matter what he says. But it is becoming increasingly obvious to any sane person that with regard to the “Russian investigation,” there is nothing to investigate. Let's not put the Washington Post on a pedestal and call them something they are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 What You Need to Know Before Sessions Testifies at the Senate Intelligence Committee Today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 What You Need to Know Before Sessions Testifies at the Senate Intelligence Committee Today. Reading that you would hardly know he recused himself from the Russia investigation, had to re-do his under oath testimony and probably perjured himself. The right wing media sure tries to keep the ignorance going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 (edited) "To suggest that I participated in any collusion...is an appalling and detestable lie." ....AG Sessions with a feisty denial Sessions accuses his former colleague, Sen. Franken, of asking him a "rambling" question in hearing. Chris Cillizza ✔ @CillizzaCNN "Absurd" to request that Sessions recusal means he couldn't be consulted on firing Comey, says Sessions Edited June 13, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 "To suggest that I participated in any collusion...is an appalling and detestable lie." ....AG Sessions with a feisty denial Sessions accuses his former colleague, Sen. Franken, of asking him a "rambling" question in hearing. Chris Cillizza ✔ @CillizzaCNN "Absurd" to request that Sessions recusal means he couldn't be consulted on firing Comey, says Sessions Rambling would be the closest to coherence out of Franken's mouth in decades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Rambling would be the closest to coherence out of Franken's mouth in decades. This is what happens when comedian runs for office and wins. Dude has to be so far over his head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 (edited) The Latest: AG Sessions contradicts Comey testimony about the former FBI director's concerns about meeting with Trump. http://apne.ws/2sxOhPo Trying to understand: What do Democrats think happened at the Mayflower? “Mr. Attorney General, did you run into this man or this woman at the Mayflower Hotel?” Sessions is claiming any conversation he might have had with Trump about the reasons for firing Comey falls under executive privilege if executive privilege doesn’t cover conversations between the AG and POTUS on personnel issues, it doesn’t cover anything. Edited June 13, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 Sessions should start laughing at any question they ask. They couldn't possibly be serious in what they are doing. Laughter will end this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 The Latest: AG Sessions contradicts Comey testimony about the former FBI director's concerns about meeting with Trump. http://apne.ws/2sxOhPo I want to ask the same thing every time I hear a woman with a Russian accent. This or "say Hogan Darling" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 AG Sessions says he has "confidence" in special counsel Mueller, adds he knows "nothing about the investigation." http://abcn.ws/2rmutis Ron Wyden......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 He was the national security person for Trump and there were no discussions about Russia's attack on our election? Trump never even talked about it? Ok! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 ANDREW MCCARTHY: The Parameters of Attorney General Sessions’s Recusal. Tom Cotton direct & to the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 This is great. They are blaming Comey for muddying up the election. So Trump fired Comey for helping him win the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 No caption needed. . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted June 13, 2017 Share Posted June 13, 2017 No caption needed. . . . . I'm guessing at this point you have an Amazon subscription service to replace you control, C and V keys...what? Monthly? Wait. You do know what Amazon is, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts