Jump to content

Whats everyone's beef with McGee


brihs2005

Recommended Posts

Why is everyone so down on McGee that they think he can't be a starting #2 Corner in this league or for this team. He had a REALLY rocky start, but he started to come into his own later in the season. I didn't see a lot of the same mistakes that i did in the first few games he started. While not a shut down corner i like what he brings to our Defense and think he has earned a starting spot.

 

I agree we need more depth at Corner, but it seems that everyone is looking to land a FA corner or draft a corner so McGee can go back to being the nickle.

 

Did i not see something during the last 6-8 weeks of the season where McGee played himself out of the starting lineup instead of into a solid #2 corner on our depth chart?

 

Your thoughts...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think McGee is a very capable #2 corner in this league. He has a great nose for the ball and a short term memory for bad plays.

 

Having said that, drafting another CB is critical. Who knows whether Clements will stay beyond 2005, and you can never have enough good CB's for your nickel and dime formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No particular beef here - he's done ok. But I recall the various scouting reports prior to him being drafted - the consensus was that he would be a fine free safety, and played CB in his last year out of team necessity. He was also thought to be among the very best return men in college, so it was disappointing to see GW et al not use him in that role in his first season. He certainly vindicated the scout's opinions in that regard last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is everyone so down on McGee that they think he can't be a starting #2 Corner in this league or for this team.  He had a REALLY rocky start, but he started to come into his own later in the season.  I didn't see a lot of the same mistakes that i did in the first few games he started.  While not a shut down corner i like what he brings to our Defense and think he has earned a starting spot. 

 

I agree we need more depth at Corner, but it seems that everyone is looking to land a FA corner or draft a corner so McGee can go back to being the nickle.

 

Did i not see something during the last 6-8 weeks of the season where McGee played himself out of the starting lineup instead of into a solid #2 corner on our depth chart?

 

Your thoughts...?

255638[/snapback]

 

 

I've posted before that I feel that we need another veteran corner so that we can better match up against multiple WR sets. I was at the finale against Pittsburgh when that point was painfully driven home. Whether we get one to become the starter opposite Clements or to be the nickel back, we do need one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just isn't very good in man to man coverage. VA Bills said it best, he has very bad hips and gets turned around way to easily. We could do better but at least he isn't Chris Watson! :blink:

255644[/snapback]

 

We play a very aggressive blitz defense that leaves our corners one on one frequently. In such a case, the corners have to play conservatively to avoid the big play. The key is to learn when to make an aggresive move to the ball and when to lay back, play it safe and make a tackle.

 

Clemens has really learned this and the QB's stay away from him in general. McGee is younger and therefore they tend to look his direction more. There is no such thing as a shutdown corner in this defensive package. McGee is young, athletic, and has a nose for the ball. For a guy with bad hips, he sure can evade tacklers on kickoff returns.

 

McGee will be fine with another year out there. We can not have pro-bowlers at every position. He is more than adequate as our #2 corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I remember correctly......it was Nate who was burnt multiple times......and ah ....the jacksonville game..........knock it down nate........knock it down...

255687[/snapback]

Nate wasn't burnt much this past season and is a big time playmaker. There are no CBs in the history of the NFL who don't give up catches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think McGee is terrible, and he will get better. His size is not great, given the trend toward big, physical receivers, particularly in the AFC. I like McGee better as a nickel back. All things staying the same though, a good defensive line can mask a weakness in the secondary, rarely the other way around...re-sign PW please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think McGee is terrible, and he will get better.  His size is not great, given the trend toward big, physical receivers, particularly in the AFC.  I like McGee better as a nickel back.  All things staying the same though, a good defensive line can mask a weakness in the secondary, rarely the other way around...re-sign PW please!

255710[/snapback]

 

McGee early in the year got picked on quite heavily, but really did settle down for the most part in the second half of the year. While winfiled had far superior technique and was one of the best tacklers pound for pound, he lost many points because the "big" INT just wasn't part of his game. McGee will jump routes a bit more, has shown the ability to pick a few off. I like his "big" play possibilities.

 

Winfield also did alot of his tackling "after" he gave up the catch. I don't care how close he was when the opposition WR made catch after catch. Also, to this observer, Winfiled seemed to struggle with the deep ball more than a quality CB should have. Winfield was and still is a solid CB, just no where near worth the ridiculous money he got from Minny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with McGee that can't be fixed with experience.  What I saw last year is a young guy who was relying on his athletic ability to get by.  As far as hips go, I don't see a problem.

255668[/snapback]

 

I am torn on this one. He was having a lot of problems early on, but a big part of it was also explained by stiffs at FS. When Vincent came back, McGee's game "improved" but he was still picked on mercilessly. While he may have the talent to eventually become a solid No. 2, I'm still favoring the addition of Chad Scott to the secondary, as that would immediately make ours among, if not the best, units in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am torn on this one.  He was having a lot of problems early on, but a big part of it was also explained by stiffs at FS.  When Vincent came back, McGee's game "improved" but he was still picked on mercilessly.  While he may have the talent to eventually become a solid No. 2, I'm still favoring the addition of Chad Scott to the secondary, as that would immediately make ours among, if not the best, units in the league.

255745[/snapback]

I'm not sure Scott still has "it" - though if he were willing to take the vet minimum and paltry signing bonus plus incentives he'd be worth a look. Sometimes you just have to let a guy succeed or fail. Considering the guy on the other side is Nate Clements, if I were the OC my offense would certainly be attacking dude with half a season of starts under his belt and Ike Reese over him. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure Scott still has "it" - though if he were willing to take the vet minimum and paltry signing bonus plus incentives he'd be worth a look.  Sometimes you just have to let a guy succeed or fail.  Considering the guy on the other side is Nate Clements, if I were the OC my offense would certainly be attacking dude with half a season of starts under his belt and Ike Reese over him.  :blink:

255751[/snapback]

 

I'm hoping that Scott's injury history will help to keep his price down. There are enough No. 1 CBs on the market to appease the teams needing the shut-down corner. I honestly think that Scott will cost us not much more than the vet minimu, which in his case will be about $750 - $1MM.

 

I'm going on Scott's performance vs us as the gauging stick. He shut down every Bills receiver he faced that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several years ago, the Bills were in the playoffs with their 4th and 5th string corners as I recall. You saw how that turned out. :doh:

I think that MaGee has a great upside, but he returns kickoffs. Clements IS very good, and he returns punts. This increases the injury risk for both. The Bills are dangerously thin at CB. The pass rush that our front 4 provides is good, but not earth shattering. This football team needs more quality corners and quickly, considering that Nate is all but gone after this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing wrong with McGee that can't be fixed with experience.  What I saw last year is a young guy who was relying on his athletic ability to get by.  As far as hips go, I don't see a problem.

255668[/snapback]

Mcgee seems to want to ride his receivers to the outside. When the receiver goes like he is cutting that way there were numerous times where Mcgee rather then keeping his hips square turns to the outsidewhile the receiver is still underneath him. This gives the inside route to the receiver if he recognizes it and was a big part of Mcgee getting burned during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mcgee seems to want to ride his receivers to the outside. 

255869[/snapback]

That's probably what was being coached. As he is supposed to have help over the top.

 

Like I said earlier, experience is what the kid is lacking - it sure isn't athletic ability. As for turning his hips, he doesn't have any problem doing it when he's returning kicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...