PolishDave Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Does anyone else find it unbelievably humorous watching these political videos of the people who want Pot legalized in New York State. Friggin hilarious burnouts. Yeah man.......psssssss.....bad buzz.......Yeah it should be legal........Wait what?...........psss....bad buzz Channel 7 was interviewing some of them. Where in the hell do they scrape this dirtbags up from? Burnouts are funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 By any chance was any of them asking a Kinny garden teacher to buy his dinner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Yes on 64 in CA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighttime in Nigeria Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 An acquaintance and I were discussing how embarrassing it is to have these people represent the legalization point of view. Many people I know, and have known, are both highly (no pun) functioning human beings and pot smokers. One with a PhD in physics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 An acquaintance and I were discussing how embarrassing it is to have these people represent the legalization point of view. Many people I know, and have known, are both highly (no pun) functioning human beings and pot smokers. One with a PhD in physics! Impressive. Does the physic Ph.D. have an actual job? Imagine what these people could achieve if they weren't hooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Drugs errr bad.....mmmmkay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Impressive. Does the physic Ph.D. have an actual job? Imagine what these people could achieve if they weren't hooked. you mean with alcohol or tobacco.......both that are proven addictive and harmful.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Does anyone else find it unbelievably humorous watching these political videos of the people who want Pot legalized in New York State. Friggin hilarious burnouts. Yeah man.......psssssss.....bad buzz.......Yeah it should be legal........Wait what?...........psss....bad buzz Channel 7 was interviewing some of them. Where in the hell do they scrape this dirtbags up from? Burnouts are funny. Link ? By any chance was any of them asking a Kinny garden teacher to buy his dinner? 5th grade idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marv's Neighbor Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 It will never pass because the users keep forgetting where to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 you mean with alcohol or tobacco.......both that are proven addictive and harmful.... i forget. How many wrongs make a right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 you mean with alcohol or tobacco.......both that are proven addictive and harmful.... So are you suggesting we make alcohol illegal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucci Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 So are you suggesting we make alcohol illegal? No, marijuana legal i forget. How many wrongs make a right? 2.....or 3....not sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighttime in Nigeria Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 (edited) Impressive. Does the physic Ph.D. have an actual job? Imagine what these people could achieve if they weren't hooked. Not sure how that relates. The point is that he is able to function cognitively at a very high level while being a consistent pot user, whereas the representatives the news media displays presumably cannot. Edited November 8, 2016 by Nighttime in Nigeria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Not sure how that relates. The point is that he is able to function cognitively at a very high level while being a consistent pot user, whereas the representatives the news media displays presumably cannot. So, no job then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighttime in Nigeria Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 So, no job then? I'll presume you can't show a relation, since you dodged the question and the reasoning provided. If he worked a retail job, he'd satisfy whatever criteria you seem to be applying. As for him, I lost touch after college, after he graduated from Notre Dame. I know, I know, Notre Dame is a well-known "stoner" school full of cognitive burnouts. Try to withhold judgment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 I'll presume you can't show a relation, since you dodged the question and the reasoning provided. If he worked a retail job, he'd satisfy whatever criteria you seem to be applying. As for him, I lost touch after college, after he graduated from Notre Dame. I know, I know, Notre Dame is a well-known "stoner" school full of cognitive burnouts. Try to withhold judgment. If you lost touch with him, how do you know he "is able to function cognitively at a very high level while being a consistent pot user"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighttime in Nigeria Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 If you lost touch with him, how do you know he "is able to function cognitively at a very high level while being a consistent pot user"? Is that a serious question? Because he graduated from my high school as salutatorian. Then from the University of Notre Dame, both of which while a pot user. I knew him personally. Now a PhD in Physics from a renowned University, likely still using. I'm not sure if you've ever pursued serious academic endeavors yourself, but they are pretty indicative of functioning at a high cognitive level, especially considering subject matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Is that a serious question? Because he graduated from my high school as salutatorian. Then from the University of Notre Dame, both of which while a pot user. I knew him personally. Now a PhD in Physics from a renowned University, likely still using. I'm not sure if you've ever pursued serious academic endeavors yourself, but they are pretty indicative of functioning at a high cognitive level, especially considering subject matter. You said "is" which is a present tense word. "Was" may have been the better choice. Maybe he hadn't killed all his brain cells when he was getting those magical degrees. If you want to defend pot, then fine, but own it. Don't make up crap about all the pot head geniuses out there and then say well I haven't seen him since college. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighttime in Nigeria Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 You said "is" which is a present tense word. "Was" may have been the better choice. Maybe he hadn't killed all his brain cells when he was getting those magical degrees. If you want to defend pot, then fine, but own it. Don't make up crap about all the pot head geniuses out there and then say well I haven't seen him since college. I provided a piece of anecdotal evidence which, for some reason, you're doubting the veracity of. There are some who function at a very high cognitve level while being a consistent pot user, and there are some who don't. You seem to hold a simplistic view against all of those who do use pot. If you apply a one-size-fits all perspective to all pot smokers, then in your words, own it. As an aside, losing touch with someone does not preclude further learning of that person through mutual friends. So "is" is, in fact, the appropriate word. Keep believing your crusade is infallible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 I provided a piece of anecdotal evidence which, for some reason, you're doubting the veracity of. There are some who function at a very high cognitve level while being a consistent pot user, and there are some who don't. You seem to hold a simplistic view against all of those who do use pot. If you apply a one-size-fits all perspective to all pot smokers, then in your words, own it. As an aside, losing touch with someone does not preclude further learning of that person through mutual friends. So "is" is, in fact, the appropriate word. Keep believing your crusade is infallible. iamverysmart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts