Kelly the Dog Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 The Pac mentality has come back to bite him. Lost his appeal. Ouch. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/09/pacman-jones-ordered-to-pay-12-4m-to-shooting-victims/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Most goes to a man who was paralyzed... Well at least he shouldn't feel angry for paying, obviously the man will need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Made 20 mil in career losing 12.5 here. That's gonna hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrod's Tailor Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Made 20 mil in career losing 12.5 here. That's gonna hurt. I'm sure PacMan made only the wisest financial decisions, so no biggie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Nevada Supreme Court makes it rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Crazy precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 a fool and his money are soon departed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmokinES3 Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Crazy precedent. A disgusting precedent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 best comment "They might as well have ordered him to pay Eleventy Zillion Smackeroos. He can’t pay that." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Turk Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) Crazy precedent. Its no different than if a person robbing a bank causes someone to be killed when a cop shoos at them, they are liable for murder. They didn't pull the trigger but their act of robbing the bank was the cause of that person being killed. He caused the incident to occur according to the evidence presented, and is held responsible for it... Edited January 10, 2015 by matter2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick the Greek Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) Pacmans a dirt bag and he lost in the highest court. That ain't your local Amherst town court. That pretty much proves he did something wrong Edited January 10, 2015 by ldandria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fingon Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Pacmans a dirt bag and he lost in the highest court. That ain't your local Amherst town court. That pretty much proves he did something wrong Well, not really. The higher courts are only looking for a !@#$up in law, not reviewing the facts of the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.529869a0a9afd197241cad0932282c97.jpg)
Recommended Posts