Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

55 minutes ago, westside said:

I think Ladexter might be winning the arguement against DCTom. We might be watching a yuge upset!!! ?

Be careful, DC Tom has snatched victory from the hands of defeat before. Just a few weeks ago he pulled gator out of his ass just to prove he was a ****ty person.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.gopusa.com/?p=52281?omhide=true

 

Thirty years of continued false climate alarms have sounded since climate change scientists started making their cataclysmic predictions that global manmade pollutants will catastrophically rise global temperatures to the point of killing off crops, mankind and other species – not to mention diminishing habitable land by rising sea levels due to melting icecaps.

Institute for Energy Research (IER) Founder and CEO Rob Bradley, Jr., considers a New York Times (NYT) story by Philip Shabecoff titled “Global Warming Has Begun” as ushering in three decades of continuous prophies that would go unfilled to the dismay of climate change activists around the world.

“If the current pace of the buildup of these gases continues, the effect is likely to be a warming of 3 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit [between now and] the year 2025 to 2050,” Shabecoff wrote in his June 24, 1988, NYTpiece. “The rise in global temperature is predicted to … caus[e] sea levels to rise by one to four feet by the middle of the next century.”

Joining the party

That year, Shabecoff’s alarmism blaming industrialized society was buttressed by two scientists’ bogus predictions – a trend that has seen one ominous climate forecast after another fail … year after year.

“[P]redictions made on that day – and ever since – continue to be falsified in the real world,” Bradley stressed in his report. “The predictions made by climate scientist James Hansen and Michael Oppenheimer back in 1988 – and reported as model projected by journalist Philip Shabecoff – constitute yet another exaggerated Malthusian scare, joining those of the population bomb (Paul Ehrlich), resource exhaustion (Club of Rome), Peak Oil (M. King Hubbert), and global cooling (John Holdren).”

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2018 at 6:15 PM, B-Man said:

DNC CONSIDERS REPEALING FOSSIL FUEL DONATION BAN AFTER ONLY TWO MONTHS.

 

 

I’ll believe global warming is a crisis, when the people who tell me it’s a crisis start to act like it’s a crisis themselves

 

 

Which gets more press, announcing the ban on big oil donations or voting to lift the ban?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/10/2018 at 6:12 PM, 4merper4mer said:

So what exactly did cause the drought and civil war in Syria?  

 

 

Normal weather patterns.  Once apon a time, that part of the world had 7 years of bountiful harvest, followed by 7 years of drought.

 

If there is a drought, it MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST be "because of" Algore's FRAUD.

 

Meanwhile, the NYT officially received an F for getting SCHOOLED in climate science by LaDexter.

On 8/11/2018 at 12:37 PM, westside said:

I think Ladexter might be winning the arguement against DCTom.

 

 

LMFAO!

 

Winning isn't the word.  Annihilating is....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Normal weather patterns.  Once apon a time, that part of the world had 7 years of bountiful harvest, followed by 7 years of drought.

 

If there is a drought, it MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST MUST be "because of" Algore's FRAUD.

 

Meanwhile, the NYT officially received an F for getting SCHOOLED in climate science by LaDexter.

 

 

LMFAO!

 

Winning isn't the word.  Annihilating is....

Annihilating logic, reasoning and common sense in the merits of argument and thought?

 

Yes, I'd agree.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DC Tom is trying to defend the two great frauds of our time.  He is failing miserably.

 

On the Warming Fraud, DC Tom believes three island chains are "sinking" because of "ocean rise," but nothing else is sinking, and never mind that all three island chains are right on the "lip" of the PROF, on the subduction side.  DC Tom cheered when the "warmers" took the two and only two atmospheric temp readings, satellites and balloons, both of which showed no warming in highly correlated fashion, and fudged both with uncorrelated "corrections."  DC Tom can't explain how Co2 thawed North America while it froze Greenland during the past million years.  Wait, DC Tom now claims that Co2 clumped over NA and departed Greenland entirely... or something like that....

 

LOGIC, one aspect of intellect which Global Warmers LACK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

DC Tom is trying to defend the two great frauds of our time.  He is failing miserably.

 

On the Warming Fraud, DC Tom believes three island chains are "sinking" because of "ocean rise," but nothing else is sinking, and never mind that all three island chains are right on the "lip" of the PROF, on the subduction side.  DC Tom cheered when the "warmers" took the two and only two atmospheric temp readings, satellites and balloons, both of which showed no warming in highly correlated fashion, and fudged both with uncorrelated "corrections."  DC Tom can't explain how Co2 thawed North America while it froze Greenland during the past million years.  Wait, DC Tom now claims that Co2 clumped over NA and departed Greenland entirely... or something like that....

 

LOGIC, one aspect of intellect which Global Warmers LACK

 

Read the entire thread and get back to me.

 

And buy a new map, for Christ's sake.  :wallbash:

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

LMFAO!!!!

 

 

Hey DC Tom, is Antarctica an ICE AGE right now???

 

LOL!!!

 

You're attributing things to me that I never said, because you can't be bothered to know what I think, because you're too busy being incapable of reading a map to read the entire thread to find out what I think.

 

Educate yourself or !@#$ off, you antisemetic shitburglar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LaDexter said:

DC Tom was asked a simple question.

 

DC Tom doesn't want to answer that question.

 

Instead, DC Tom resorts to chosen CARD TOSSING.....

 

 

 

What question?  "Is Antarctica an ICE AGE right now?"

 

That wasn't a simple question.  It wasn't even English.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

DC Tom was asked a simple question.

 

DC Tom doesn't want to answer that question.

 

Instead, DC Tom resorts to chosen CARD TOSSING.....

 

 

 

this is kinda between y'alllllllll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us simplify the question so that those with a 4th grade scientific "understanding" can understand....

 

We are trying to define ICE AGE. 

 

Are ICE AGES continent specific???

 

HINT = check GREENLAND vs. NORTH AMERICA during the past million years....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LaDexter said:

Let us simplify the question so that those with a 4th grade scientific "understanding" can understand....

 

We are trying to define ICE AGE. 

 

No, we're not. We're still trying to define "subduction zone."

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...