touchdownbuffalo Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 I'd get rid of WGR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeyBomb Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 (edited) Hands DOWN Fitzpatrick haha. How is this even a question. The guy makes our coach look HORRIBLE. Chan's issue is he keeps believing in his dumb qb and for that he would be the next on that list to leave. Edited November 30, 2012 by DukeyBomb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LancasterSteve Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 Look at Fitz's face, he can't even groom himself? They are all one in the same, so if you replace Gailey, the replacement would dump the other two, so I say Gailey on this question. Â The befuddled one is in over his head. A new coach will bring in his own staff and hopefully build this team around a better QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 not even close...CHANNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfaninky Posted November 30, 2012 Share Posted November 30, 2012 Another violation of the rules (once again, have to assume if you pick a HC the QB and DC will stay the same; if you pick a new DC, Fitz and Chan stay, etc) Â Your sentence is to listen to Chan Gailey's last press conference in its entirety and then write out on a sheet of paper 200 times " Fitz is our QB of the future" Â My Bad I will have my paper in by Monday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrags Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 WGR actually raised a good question this morning (they only gave a choice of Fitz or Chan but I felt it necessary to add Wanny)...if you could only pick one to leave next year, who would it be??  Chan? and get a new head coach Fitz? and get a new QB Wanny? and get a new D coordinator  I'd have to go with Chan...I could handle one more year of Fitz with a HC who will stress running the ball as opposed to our current HC/Offensive Coordinator who insists on firing blanks every Sunday. If we concentrated on the run and don't give up when we only get one yard on first down, we would command more respect from the opponent's LB's. Fitz would have to stick around for another year and Wanny might be able to develop some more original defensive schemes in the off season (or at least a new head coach would tell him to). Thanks for saying everything exactly the way I'd want to. Makes my post easier to type.  -----^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
towelie Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Oh I like this game. Let's see, I'd probably marry Fitz, F Wanny and kill Chan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronc24 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Oh I like this game. Let's see, I'd probably marry Fitz, F Wanny and kill Chan  I see Intervention didn't take.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Keep them all. Draft a qb or two to develop, and quickly please. Fit your f'n gaps wanny. you are starting to look like a coordinator after the last 3 games and getting the running shut down and hire an O coordinator for Chan. He is spread too thin and it shows. I would really like a head coach and Gailey as OC, but thats tough to pull off at this point ask me again next year. too soon to sweep em off the payroll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcbillsfan Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Without question fitz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Fitz, no matter how bad or crazy you think Gailey's playcalling is, we would have a winning record with a QB that can attack every part of the field and be more accurate with his throws. Â Every team who had a QB like that would have a winning record.. Â So its Gaileys fault he has schemed up plays that leave guys as open as you'll see in the NFL two or three times a game running downfield and because our QB can't make a simple throw on target we leave 14 easy points on the field? Â I mean how many wide open TDs has Fitz missed this year? 8? 9? Maybe more? Â Add 14 points to our totals each game and see what our win/loss record would be. I find it amazing Gailey can scheme the way he does with a QB that can't throw the ball more than 15 yards...its pretty impressive when you really think about it... Â Your math suffers from its own degree of...inaccuracy. But as you know, we still would have lost to NE, NYJ and SF even if we scored 14 more points. In fact, we lost 4 out of 5 games where the Bills scored 28 or more points. Only 2 teams have given up more points than this defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills Fan888 Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Definitely Fitz. Â The offense is limited because of him, not because of Chan. The defense has already shown signs of improving and I wouldn't be surprised if Wannestadt's unit ends up with a respectable ranking based on the slew of sub par talent coming up on the schedule. Any defense needs time to work into their new system and learn their roles. If we can get a good middle lb this year in the offseason it'll help out his scheme a lot. How can you say that the offense is not limited by Chan? I agree with everything you said except that part, Fitz is a limiting factor but Chan's refusal to use CJ in key parts of the game is just as limiting. I've been hesitant with my critiquing of Chan and if he does pull it together I'd still be willing to forgive him but it is beyond frustrating to see the Bills have running back who has the ability to be a HoF'er and not use him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Fitz. I'd still like to see what Gailey could do with a decent QB. Although, I'd be fine if all three are gone next year. Â +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted December 1, 2012 Author Share Posted December 1, 2012 Â Â I see Intervention didn't take. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussellDopeland Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Can I pick Ralph? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted December 1, 2012 Author Share Posted December 1, 2012 Can I pick Ralph? No soup for you!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webster Guy Posted December 1, 2012 Share Posted December 1, 2012 Fitz. I'd still like to see what Gailey could do with a decent QB. Although, I'd be fine if all three are gone next year. exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts