LabattBlue Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 OJ is probably still living the good life even in jail. Probably in solitary, is able to gain special privs with the guards do to who he is, etc... What a dumb f***. He murdered two people, did not get convicted, and could have lived out his live playing golf or whatever the hell he was doing after the verdict. SO what does he do?...gets in trouble with the law a second time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 OJ is probably still living the good life even in jail. Probably in solitary, is able to gain special privs with the guards do to who he is, etc... What a dumb f***. He murdered two people, did not get convicted, and could have lived out his live playing golf or whatever the hell he was doing after the verdict. SO what does he do?...gets in trouble with the law a second time! Just think...he probably would have been convicted if the LAPD hadn't tried to frame him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 C'mon, Huffington Post, National Enquirer? Red flag anyone? What? National Enquirer isn't credible? Does that mean back in the day, Tammy Fay Baker wasn't abducted by aliens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cvanvol Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 I highly doubt the national enquirer could find out about this without authorities knowing first. Also how did he hide the knife in the bahamas? Also isnt he in prison for trying to reclaim things that were legally his? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonborn10 Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 What? National Enquirer isn't credible? Does that mean back in the day, Tammy Fay Baker wasn't abducted by aliens? National Enquirer broke the John Edwards affair and baby story - so yes they CAN be a credible news source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayD Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 LOL I thought the same thing until it referenced a source close to Simpson (whatever that's worth) +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 National Enquirer broke the John Edwards affair and baby story - so yes they CAN be a credible news source anything CAN be. doesnt mean they ARE. you throw enough against the wall and eventually something is bound to stick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xsoldier54 Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 What? National Enquirer isn't credible? Does that mean back in the day, Tammy Fay Baker wasn't abducted by aliens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) Just think...he probably would have been convicted if the LAPD hadn't tried to frame him... truth. i watched that whole trial and that was the biggest bunch of bumbling fools i have ever seen. i think it was vanadder that actually kept a sample of ojs blood in his pocket for like eight hours! yeah no thats not gonna give the defense just cause to challenge the dna. morons i loved oj, he represents so many great childhood memories, and i was just hoping and praying he was innocent. but after watching every second of those proceedings i reluctantly came to the conclusion thats one negro that needed to be convicted - though frankly i would have voted to acquit based on the equally inept prosecution, they simply never made their case beyond a reasonable doubt. oj was guilty but got away with it due to sheer ineptitude. sad i wonder if johnny cochran and the others really thought he was innocent. we will probably never know Edited October 18, 2012 by Meathead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Best Player Available Posted October 18, 2012 Share Posted October 18, 2012 (edited) i wonder if johnny cochran and the others really thought he was innocent. we will probably never know Well, with Cochran we definitely won't know, but it's hard to believe him and the rest of his defense really thought he was innocent. They were top attorney's who saw and heard it all. And, they did beat the krap out of one of the worst prosecution teams in California history. They all got a (bigger) shot of fame and of course most of OJ's money. That trial was a farce with even Ito loving all the prime time attention he was getting. Got too say though, I miss the judge Ito dancers from the Tonight show. Edited October 18, 2012 by Best Player Available Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve O Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Just think...he probably would have been convicted if the LAPD hadn't tried to frame him... this pretty much sums it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badasss Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Cutlery? What's that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy10 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I haven't looked at all the names on the Stadium Wall of Fame in awhile...is his name on there?? If it is, and if this story is true (i.e. he truly contends he has the knife that he used to kill his wife and Goldman and is selling it for $5 mill) then his name should come down. Yup, still up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted October 19, 2012 Author Share Posted October 19, 2012 Yup, still up there. That should be Paragraph 68(a) of the new lease: Anyone who has been found liable for the wrongful butchering of human beings with a judgment of $30 million shall be taken off the Wall of Fame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts