birdog1960 Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i'm not sure which party has the highest incidence of genital warts but this issue is really becoming a problem for perry. of course, i agree with mandatory hpv immunization just as i do for other common, serious infectious diseases. seems like a rather obscure reason to vote or not vote for a presidential candidate, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i'm not sure which party has the highest incidence of genital warts but this issue is really becoming a problem for perry. of course, i agree with mandatory hpv immunization just as i do for other common, serious infectious diseases. seems like a rather obscure reason to vote or not vote for a presidential candidate, however. Actually, I'd bet the Democrats have a higher incidence, just for having Bill Clinton and the Kennedys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted September 13, 2011 Share Posted September 13, 2011 i'm not sure which party has the highest incidence of genital warts but this issue is really becoming a problem for perry. of course, i agree with mandatory hpv immunization just as i do for other common, serious infectious diseases. seems like a rather obscure reason to vote or not vote for a presidential candidate, however. Not only was Merck one of Perry's supporters, but his "wife" worked for them at the time...I find the hypocrisy on this issue hilarious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 While I agree you can't force people to get vaccinated, given the opt out option I don't see why it's a big deal. Bachman and Santorum look like dipshits IMO, although a lot of conservative commentary suggests quite the opposite. Why wouldn't you want your daughter to get the vaccine, you know, other than maybe if you're a brain dead (*^*&%^$^#!@#$? Not only was Merck one of Perry's supporters, but his "wife" worked for them at the time...I find the hypocrisy on this issue hilarious... Actually it's a conflict of interest. Not that it isn't worthy of observation, but I can't help but find it interesting that given all the conflicts of interest that have occurred within the official acts of the administration over the last 3 years that this is the one you selectively zero in on. But if you're willing to cop to being the partisan hack that you are I guess I have no real criticism here, other than misusage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Perry getting $5k from vaccine producer Merck = conflict of interest. Jeffery Immelt sitting on BO's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness and offshoring GE's aero division to China = happenstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinton, Bill Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Actually, I'd bet the Democrats have a higher incidence, just for having Bill Clinton and the Kennedys. You don't know the half of it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Perry getting $5k from vaccine producer Merck = conflict of interest. Jeffery Immelt sitting on BO's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness and offshoring GE's aero division to China = happenstance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted September 14, 2011 Author Share Posted September 14, 2011 Actually, I'd bet the Democrats have a higher incidence, just for having Bill Clinton and the Kennedys. it's often the ones you least expect....except nuns. turns out the idea that cervical cancer is sexually transmitted came from the observation that the incidence of this cancer in nuns is essentially zero. probably can forgo the shot in girls planning on joining a convent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 it's often the ones you least expect....except nuns. turns out the idea that cervical cancer is sexually transmitted came from the observation that the incidence of this cancer in nuns is essentially zero. probably can forgo the shot in girls planning on joining a convent. In your professional opinion, what are the chances of both Dumb in Norfolk and Buttflex getting cervical cancer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 (edited) You don't know the half of it! Jesus Bill....what's with the chunky cheerleader? Figure she's feeling a little insecure, and might respond to some behavior conditioning? Edited September 14, 2011 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 You don't know the half of it! Is this the rest of it? HPV Hillary's Pusssy Vault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 Is this the rest of it? HPV Hillary's Pusssy Vault Now that's one vault I wouldn't want to see opened! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 i'm not sure which party has the highest incidence of genital warts but this issue is really becoming a problem for perry. of course, i agree with mandatory hpv immunization just as i do for other common, serious infectious diseases. seems like a rather obscure reason to vote or not vote for a presidential candidate, however. Certainly more embarrassing than, say, Solyndra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted September 14, 2011 Share Posted September 14, 2011 (edited) While I agree you can't force people to get vaccinated, given the opt out option I don't see why it's a big deal. Bachman and Santorum look like dipshits IMO, although a lot of conservative commentary suggests quite the opposite. Why wouldn't you want your daughter to get the vaccine, you know, other than maybe if you're a brain dead (*^*&%^$^#!@#$? Actually it's a conflict of interest. Not that it isn't worthy of observation, but I can't help but find it interesting that given all the conflicts of interest that have occurred within the official acts of the administration over the last 3 years that this is the one you selectively zero in on. But if you're willing to cop to being the partisan hack that you are I guess I have no real criticism here, other than misusage. Sorry Rob...I am not suggesting there have not been conflicts of interest abound over the last three years...dlast 20 years...decades even. If you "know me" (you have been hating on me for a few year now ) you know, I have been anti-Rick Perry for a long, long time...this particular issue affected my previous job greatly. I guess I find the hypocrisy here (again, not insinuating that politics aren't full of hypocrisy, Dems, Republicans, Obama, Bush...) so astounding, because it really cuts right to the heart of all the bull **** Rick Perry preaches, and serves as a clear illustration, on numerous levels, on how full of crap this guy is. To me, he has always been all talk, and only listens to the mighty dollar. As a Texan for the last 20 years, I have never had the personal disdain for George Bush (a man I mostly don't agree with on significant issues, but have always admired his conviction)as I have for Rick Perry. If Republicans/Tea Party types think they are getting something new and fresh with Rick Perry, they are sorely misguided. btw- the charges of anybody having an opinion around here being a "partisan hack" are just stupid. Name one person here (DC Tom doesn't count) who isn't? Edited September 14, 2011 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Sorry Rob...I am not suggesting there have not been conflicts of interest abound over the last three years...dlast 20 years...decades even. If you "know me" (you have been hating on me for a few year now ) you know, I have been anti-Rick Perry for a long, long time...this particular issue affected my previous job greatly. I guess I find the hypocrisy here (again, not insinuating that politics aren't full of hypocrisy, Dems, Republicans, Obama, Bush...) so astounding, because it really cuts right to the heart of all the bull **** Rick Perry preaches, and serves as a clear illustration, on numerous levels, on how full of crap this guy is. To me, he has always been all talk, and only listens to the mighty dollar. As a Texan for the last 20 years, I have never had the personal disdain for George Bush (a man I mostly don't agree with on significant issues, but have always admired his conviction)as I have for Rick Perry. If Republicans/Tea Party types think they are getting something new and fresh with Rick Perry, they are sorely misguided. btw- the charges of anybody having an opinion around here being a "partisan hack" are just stupid. Name one person here (DC Tom doesn't count) who isn't? You need to get professional help. We'll be here for you when you get out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 You need to get professional help. We'll be here for you when you get out. But whatever you do, don't se 3rd's pshrink. He's obviously not very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 But whatever you do, don't se 3rd's pshrink. He's obviously not very good. Well Will, of the many you've seen, who would you recommend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMadCap Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Sorry Rob...I am not suggesting there have not been conflicts of interest abound over the last three years...dlast 20 years...decades even. If you "know me" (you have been hating on me for a few year now ) you know, I have been anti-Rick Perry for a long, long time...this particular issue affected my previous job greatly. I guess I find the hypocrisy here (again, not insinuating that politics aren't full of hypocrisy, Dems, Republicans, Obama, Bush...) so astounding, because it really cuts right to the heart of all the bull **** Rick Perry preaches, and serves as a clear illustration, on numerous levels, on how full of crap this guy is. To me, he has always been all talk, and only listens to the mighty dollar. As a Texan for the last 20 years, I have never had the personal disdain for George Bush (a man I mostly don't agree with on significant issues, but have always admired his conviction)as I have for Rick Perry. If Republicans/Tea Party types think they are getting something new and fresh with Rick Perry, they are sorely misguided. btw- the charges of anybody having an opinion around here being a "partisan hack" are just stupid. Name one person here (DC Tom doesn't count) who isn't? Me. My disgust for anyone with a Letter after their name is equal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 Me. My disgust for anyone with a Letter after their name is equal... What if the letter is an I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 15, 2011 Share Posted September 15, 2011 What if the letter is an I? Or a "G"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts