ieatcrayonz Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The media reports that Cowher has very few demands with regard to a roster for his new team but an established QB is one of the demands. This means, if the reports are accurate, the Bills can't win with Cowher. It is a Kitch 22. If he wants an established QB he wouldn't come here for Fitz/Edwards. Brohm may have a chance but is certainly not established. If he thinks of Fitz or Edwards as "established" we don't want him. Our only hop is that the media reports are incorrect. This is a possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGimp Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The media reports that Cowher has very few demands with regard to a roster for his new team but an established QB is one of the demands. This means, if the reports are accurate, the Bills can't win with Cowher. It is a Kitch 22. If he wants an established QB he wouldn't come here for Fitz/Edwards. Brohm may have a chance but is certainly not established. If he thinks of Fitz or Edwards as "established" we don't want him. Our only hop is that the media reports are incorrect. This is a possibility. Dude, we have Gibran what more could he want? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 which is why buffalo will take a qb in rd 1 or 2... that or trade for kolb.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOBILLS78 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 What is a "Kitch 22"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 which is why buffalo will take a qb in rd 1 or 2... that or trade for kolb.... What part of "established" did you not understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 ive seen no confirmed source that cowher wants an established qb.... more specualtion if u ask me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 What is a "Kitch 22"? A Kitch 22 is a no win situation. You're darned if you do, darned if you don't. In this case, if Cowher wants an established QB he won't come here. If he thinks of either Fitz or Edwards as established he is clearly not too bright and we don't want him anyway. Either way we lose. Did I explain that better this time? Sorry if it was unclear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 What is a "Kitch 22"? The title of a Joseph Heller novel, translated into Idiotese.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 A Kitch 22 is a no win situation. You're darned if you do, darned if you don't. Kind of a Catch-22, really. I'm damned to being a smartass if I mock you out for this retarded error, and damned to internal torture if I let this go without a smartass remark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The title of a Joseph Heller novel, translated into Idiotese.... u r obviously wound up way to tight..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Bills Fan Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I thought it was "Catch-22" as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillnutinHouston Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 A Kitch 22 is a no win situation. You're darned if you do, darned if you don't. In this case, if Cowher wants an established QB he won't come here. If he thinks of either Fitz or Edwards as established he is clearly not too bright and we don't want him anyway. Either way we lose. Did I explain that better this time? Sorry if it was unclear. Um, I think you mean "Catch 22", like from the book that launched that popular phrase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UConn James Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 From a coach who only finally won the Super Bowl with a rookie QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The media reports that Cowher has very few demands with regard to a roster for his new team but an established QB is one of the demands. This means, if the reports are accurate, the Bills can't win with Cowher. It is a Kitch 22. If he wants an established QB he wouldn't come here for Fitz/Edwards. Brohm may have a chance but is certainly not established. If he thinks of Fitz or Edwards as "established" we don't want him. Our only hop is that the media reports are incorrect. This is a possibility. Some coaches inherit great rosters (Gruden), others develop them (Belicheck) and some have them thrust upon them (Cowher). Then there is the Bills.... While shedding nary a tear, I can say we are better off anyway. Kitch all that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloaggie Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I thought it was "Catch-22" as well It is and I thought the Idiotese comment was actually pretty funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 The title of a Joseph Heller novel, translated into Idiotese.... I don't know what you're talking about but the term "Kitch 22" is derived from an anthropology team that went to study primative cultures in 1922. They happened upon a group of people so stupid that when confronted with a decision...any decision, they would either choose the wrong answer or confuse the issue so much that there became a situation with no right answer. The people were so stupid they literally had no chance of getting anything right. Their entire coutry was filled with dumb people, but this place was especially backward. After a while this stupidity started wearing off on the anthropolgists. They had to get out of there before they became part of the crowd. They wrote a reoprt in a scientific journal called "Kitchener 1922". It became "Kitch 22" for short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Kolb couldn't throw a pass that Lee Evans would be able to kitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 I don't know what you're talking about but the term "Kitch 22" is derived from an anthropology team that went to study primative cultures in 1922. They happened upon a group of people so stupid that when confronted with a decision...any decision, they would either choose the wrong answer or confuse the issue so much that there became a situation with no right answer. The people were so stupid they literally had no chance of getting anything right. Their entire coutry was filled with dumb people, but this place was especially backward. After a while this stupidity started wearing off on the anthropolgists. They had to get out of there before they became part of the crowd. They wrote a reoprt in a scientific journal called "Kitchener 1922". It became "Kitch 22" for short. Mildly amusing that this term is then used in a post about Cowher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRM33064 Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 "Kitch 22" may also simply be "Catch 22" translated into WNY-ease. For instance, "Dat der Cowher problem is a rill Kitch 22 ... but I swears I seen 'em drivin' down da two-nineny dis mornin, right byes da big blue wadder tower der." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffaloaggie Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Article where the "established QB" is mentioned Nov 24, 2009 story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts