John Adams Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I can't tell if you're serious or just pulling chains, but either way you should probably give it a rest. You're getting your ass kicked on this subject and John Adams hasn't even shown up yet. I was at the gym. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska_Darin_Is_Gay Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 As if it matters whether it's genetic or a choice. Why restrict the rights of two adults to marry? What gives the government the right to restrict people's rights to so marry? Yea, that's right: nothing. Except that it bothers you. Because by definition marriage is between a man and a woman. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Because by definition marriage is between a man and a woman. Period. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaack! Donnie is a bigot! Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaack! Marriage only used to be between a white man and a white woman. Somehow that changed. Get over yourself and your bigoted ideals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska_Darin_Is_Gay Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaack! Donnie is a bigot! Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaack! Marriage only used to be between a white man and a white woman. Somehow that changed. Get over yourself and your bigoted ideals. Bwaaaaaaaaaack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Bwaaaaaaaaaack? You're a myna bird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 I was at the gym. Did you say hi to Bill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Because by definition marriage is between a man and a woman. Period. By whose definition? There's no such thing as a formal definition of marriage between a man and a woman. There are societal moires that dictated marriage to be between a man and a woman, as well as religious dictum that classified it as such, but from a legal standpoint it's still wide open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 If marriage is a "right" (either hetero or homo), then I should sue Kaley Cuoco, Megan Fox, and Grace Park for infringing on my right to marry them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 If marriage is a "right" (either hetero or homo), then I should sue Kaley Cuoco, Megan Fox, and Grace Park for infringing on my right to marry them You mean consummate, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska_Darin_Is_Gay Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 By whose definition? There's no such thing as a formal definition of marriage between a man and a woman. There are societal moires that dictated marriage to be between a man and a woman, as well as religious dictum that classified it as such, but from a legal standpoint it's still wide open. By everyone since the dawn of time. It was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 By everyone since the dawn of time. It was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. What are the Chinese names for Adam & Eve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 By everyone since the dawn of time. It was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. I knew you weren't going to be able to leave the zealot slogan out. Thanks for not disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 By everyone since the dawn of time. It was Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve. What if Adam Lambert married Stevie Nicks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew in CA Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Are there any legitimate arguments against homosexual marriage out there? I'm really curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Actually it does. Granting homosexuals special rights doesnt abridge the privileges of heterosexuals? No. How in the ever-lovin' hell do you even get that idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 What are the Chinese names for Adam & Eve? I believe that to be C6 and crab rangoon. A marriage made in heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 What are the Chinese names for Adam & Eve? Happy Family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Hedd Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 2, 3, maybe 5 years on this will no longer be an issue. Just a progression, or as some would have it a regression. Doesn't affect me so I don't care either way but some of my gay and lesbian friends are concerned. I tell them what I always do....be patient. Don't rock the boat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 2, 3, maybe 5 years on this will no longer be an issue. Just a progression, or as some would have it a regression. Doesn't effect me so I don't care either way but some of my gay and lesbian friends are concerned. I tell them what I always do....be patient. Don't rock the boat... I tell them they're barking up the wrong tree. They need to take this to Washington. It's on the Fed side where they're getting screwed. So they get recognized as a married couple in the state but doesn't help them on the fed side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 I tell them they're barking up the wrong tree. They need to take this to Washington. It's on the Fed side where they're getting screwed. So they get recognized as a married couple in the state but doesn't help them on the fed side. No thanks. It is a state issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts