Search the Community
Showing results for 'transform' in content posted by Doc.
-
Fundamental transformation…
-
"Suckers and Losers"---Trump on our GI's
Doc replied to Tiberius's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Yes because Dems wanting to "fundamentally transform" America and have Trump on their brains 24/7 worrying about what he might do that he didn't last time are so happy. -
Again, anyone who wants to fundamentally transform something cannot love it, and more likely hates it.
-
PRO-AMERICA | ANTI-TRUMP = VOTE BLUE
Doc replied to BillStime's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Now that I've started responding to you again, can you tell me what that stupid meme actually means? AKA "fundamentally transform America." Like I've been saying... -
Please. Dems want to "fundamentally transform" America. As I repeatedly say, you can't love something if you want to fundamentally transform it. And America's greatness is hanging-on by a thread. But greatness doesn't automatically last and recognizing when things are starting to fall apart is the key. Not trying to change it to something it never was. As for rewarding hard work, are we? Or are things being dumbed down?
-
And you're worse at it John. Again illegals know Dems want them in the country. There is no need to say "our border is open." That's why 8M have come into the country, with a huge assist from Joke reversing Trump's policies on Day One. Those who have entered already and are busting city budgets and being criminals are all on the Dems and can't/won't be pawned-off on the Repubs, and deep down you know it but have to say otherwise. As for the bolded, yeah, I know. Like I said, you can't love something if you want to fundamentally transform it into something it never was. And greatness doesn't automatically stay that way.
-
Libs are so dumb and transparent. They think you need to say things over and over and over again to prove that you believe in what you claim. I don't need to say what I love about America, just like I don't have to say what I love about my wife. I just do, and again, I'm not trying to fundamentally transform either.
-
17 Inches Intersting Analogy Full of Truth .
Doc replied to T master's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
And that's why Jane Democrat gets up every morning at 9 AM wanting to fundamentally transform it, right? -
Exactly. Again you don't try and "fundamentally transform" something you love.
-
Elon Musk, War puppeteer
Doc replied to Joe Ferguson forever's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I don' t need to dig. Or prove anything to you. I just call 'em like I see 'em. And what I see is that they know how to play you guys like fiddles, telling lies to get you all riled up in order to push their agenda of "fundamental transformation." I mean they even have you against things you supported just years ago and loathing yourselves for being white. Now that's impressive! As for Josh, I thought he had a chance to leave the hero ball behind what with the additions of Harty, Cook and Kincaid, and he seemed to get it early in the game. But he's a hero ball guy and always will be. I'll still support him but I doubt he ever gets the Bills a SB win. -
Elon Musk, War puppeteer
Doc replied to Joe Ferguson forever's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
No, it was trying to reverse the stupid "fundamental transformation" of America by dimwitted lib pols and the dimwits who follow them, like you. What we're seeing now is the result of it. Crime exploding because of defunding the police, illegals streaming over the border and "destroying" major cities, terrible green policy leading to higher inflation, etc. Trump was just an agent and many of us are ready to move on from him. -
So it was a stupid pick from the get-go. Even though the Browns needed a franchise QB. Would you say not taking Mahomes in 2017 was also a stupid decision? I mean, Garrett is a good player, but Mahomes would have transformed your franchise.
-
So...transforms?
-
FA OT Jake Fisher converting to TE, will work out for Bills
Doc replied to YoloinOhio's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Transformer? Is that the euphemism for it these days? -
It's the "fundamental transformation of America" Barry was promising. It was a great country while it lasted.
-
Okay, talk me out of Gilmore in the 1st.
Doc replied to simpleman's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
IMHO, Fleener is the safest pick. No character concerns, great work ethic, great hands and route-running, size, speed, and willing blocker who can improve as he fills-out his frame. He'll be a mismatch for any team and will transform the offense more than a WR, who can be had in later rounds. -
It doesn't take time to transform a defense, especially when every player has mostly played in a 4-3 in college and/or the NFL. But health will be the key.
-
To me conservatism means conserving the old ways. Mostly all the religious crap that people are repudiating more and more. Trying to outlaw abortion and squashing gay rights are becoming passe and having guys like Romney and Trump, who pay lip service to the religious base, as the party's nominee are evidence of how the Republican party is already dying, or at least, being transformed.
-
'Historic' / 'Transformational' Bill
Doc replied to jjamie12's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That Comrade Castro gave it his ringing endorsement should tell you all you need to know about this bill/law. And Timothy McVeigh did something "historic" and "transformational."