Cash

My only complaint about HOT TUB TIME MACHINE was that John Cusack went back to the same year that ONE CRAZY SUMMER took place, but there were no references to it. I would've appreciated a digital splicing of young Cusack and young Demi Moore running through the background or something.

Some dude ("Josh Reynolds" or something like that) was reporting on twitter last night that both Williams and Meachem signed with the Bills. He deleted his twitter account shortly after Meachem signed with San Diego. I imagine he'll create a new fake name and twitter account and go back to breaking big stories. If one of his alter-egos gets lucky with 3-4 correct guesses off the bat, maybe he can parlay that into a steady set of followers who will make excuses for him when he's wrong in the future. Not sure how he'd monetize that, but there's probably a way.

Went back to the Jags.

Yeah, just another misinterpretation of La Canfora's tweet/blog post. Nothing to see here.

ESPN didn't provide a lot to back it up, but said or at least implied that SD came in with a much bigger offer than the Bills and one other team. Would look up the link, but I'm posting on my phone. If it's true, then that one was 100% about money, which is fine. Meachem is not worth breaking the bank for. As for Mario, no comment.

Bad news, everyone! @Jason La Canfora Mario Williams not expected to sign in BUF tonight. Will take time with the visit and has at least one other visit scheduled #freeagency If you want to stay optimistic, note the word "expected." Means it's not confirmed by a direct source, but more likely a report from someone who claims to know what Mario or his agent are all about.

Sorry if this has already been posted, but I don't remember seeing it. For the record, I have no idea who this guy is or if he's legit, so use your judgment as to whether this is worth getting worked up over. But some dude Josh Reynolds (@1billsnews) is reporting on Twitter that both Williams and Meacham have agreed to terms with the Bills. A few of his key tweets: Josh Reynolds ‏ @1BillsNews I can can confirm Bills offer to Mario Williams Is 7yrs 110million Deal Done.. Josh Reynolds ‏ @1BillsNews Deal To be announced Tomroow officially press conference will follow. Josh Reynolds ‏ @1BillsNews Robert Meachem agrees to Deal with Bills. Official terms of the deal will be announced Josh Reynolds ‏ @1BillsNews @DonaldHymers Yes official a Buffalo bill both him and Meachem just waiting to hear official word on Meachem contract Let's hope he's right!

Ocho has never been a free agent in his career. He was traded for a low-round pick last year, though. Bryce Paup, Ted Washington, Antoine Winfield, and Sam Adams were four more high-profile FA signings that worked out really well for the teams that signed them. Johnathan Joseph was a great signing for the Texans last year; Asante Samuel was a great signing for the Eagles a few years ago. Kevin Greene was a great FA signing twice - first for the Steelers, then for the Panthers.

For the record - isn't all of this tampering until 4pm today?

The most important thing is to not overpay sub-elite free agents. Open up the checkbook for Super Mario, sure. But don't spend big for lower-tier guys like Colston, Manningham*, Wayne (he is old), etc. Remember that beyond just how bad it was in and of itself, the Dockery signing was also what first got Jason Peters PO-ed. And Chris Kelsay's first re-signing got Aaron Schobel upset. (Which no one ever talks about, because the Bills quickly gave Schobel a new deal, even though he had 3 years left on his old deal. Then decided they didn't do that anymore when Peters got upset.) Vincent Jackson is the one WR that might be both available and worth the big price tag. I personally say he is not elite and not worth going after, but you can make a good argument that he's at least borderline elite. But the point is, you're fine to go after cheap guys like Nick Barnett, Andra' Davis, or Reggie Torbor (remember folks, cheap guys don't always pan out -- they're cheap for a reason!), and you're fine to spend big on an elite talent like Mario Williams, Julius Peppers, or Albert Haynesworth (ouch, even the elite guys don't always work either, but it's worth the risk), but never spend Steve Hutchinson money on Derrick Dockery. *Especially Manningham! How many mediocre players need to have a big game in the Super Bowl, get way overpaid that offseason, then never live up to that contract before teams figure it out? Manningham began the last two seasons as a starter and lost his starting job as the season progressed both times. He's a decent NFL player who made a phenomenal catch in the Super Bowl.

Everybody says this, and usually mean it when they say it. But their agent will usually do a good job of convincing them that the "right fit" happens to be the team with the biggest offer on the table. I don't expect the Bills to go after Williams, but I'd love it if they did. No harm in trying, anyway. Disagree. Nix has been pretty straightforward/telegraphing up to this point, and his WR comments from his postseason wrapup presser definitely pointed much more towards a big leaper type to win jump balls rather than the small speedy type. It might also be relevant that while Nix was in San Diego, they very much favored the tall WR (VJax, Malcolm Floyd, etc.). I have no idea if the Bills will go after VJax (I hope they don't - Stevie should be the highest-paid WR on the team), but if they don't get a big FA WR, I expect them to go hard after someone like Stephen Hill or Alshon Jeffery in the draft. I tend to agree, although it wouldn't shock me to see Bell draw little interest and re-sign with the Bills for a 1 or 2 year deal. Wouldn't necessarily stop the Bills from going OT at #10 anyway. Buddy's recent DE comments were very interesting. He seemed to be trying to set up the idea that he wouldn't draft a DE until the middle rounds. (Reminds me of when Nix specifically ID'd O-line as the #1 offseason priority, then signed no notable FAs and drafted 1 OT in the middle rounds.) On the other hand, he did say that he was probably second-guessing the top guys too much. I think his mind hadn't been made up at that point. Interesting; haven't really seen this posited before. Personally, I doubt Morrison would be brought back if they didn't expect him to be a starter. I know he's not making much, but the Bills don't usually pay 7 figure salaries to backups. I concur - we'll see a CB drafted between rounds 3-5 or so, depending on who's available.

For an already-contending team with a late 1st rounder (Pats, 49ers), Wallace makes a ton of sense. For a team that's more than 1 player away with the #10 overall pick, Wallace makes no sense. I'd rather have the Bills use that cap money on 2 good players (whether re-signed or signed as FAs) and still have the #10 pick to acquire a third good player. I'm pretty underwhelmed by the options likely to be available at #10, but they should still be able to get a starter out of it. Plus, Wallace is just a younger, faster Lee Evans. I thought our offense had no use for a player like that? [/sarcasm]

Freeney's arms are 33", which is pretty much middle of the road, and fairly long for his short (6'1") stature. Ingram's arms are 31.5", which is pretty significantly shorter. Not saying he can't succeed (I'm sure there's examples of successful DEs with short arms), just saying that the pre-draft knocks on Freeney weren't about arm length, more about height and weight (at 268 lbs - shows how much the league has changed since then). I certainly like what you're saying about Ingram's athleticism. If he's really that beastly, he'll probably figure out a way to succeed in the NFL. I guess the main worry would be his ability to be an every-down DE and succeed against the run.

I like this re-signing. Morrison is not old and is a legitimate NFL player. I'm very comfortable with him starting at Sam and backing up the Mike. Allegedly a pretty cheap deal, too ($3m total for 2 years, up to $4m with incentives). Remember, the Bills, like every other team in the NFL, spend most of the game in nickel or dime defense. Base D linebackers who don't also double as nickel linebackers only play like 15-20 snaps a game. Between the coordinator/scheme upgrade, (hopefully) getting Kyle Williams back at full strength, and natural development of young guys like Dareus & Sheppard, our D should be much better next year even without adding better pass-rushing talent. Which is good, because I don't see any rookie making much of an impact (hope I'm wrong if we draft one at #10), and I don't see us getting Mario Williams. With Cliff Avril franchised, I'm not big on any of the other FA pass-rusher options.

Good news! Nix is walking the walk this offseason re: bringing back our own. Good to see promising players re-up. Two year deal makes a lot of sense given Chandler's out-of-nowhere season. I'll be curious to see the financials once they leak, but I'm with the rest who don't think it'll be very much. Probably fully guaranteed for 2012, similar to Stevie's deal. In general, the Bills' strategy seems to be to avoid giant bonuses/contract values, but offset that by guaranteeing a bit more. I like that approach.

I like where your head's at. Mercilus is very intriguing, especially since he and Coples are probably the only high-rated DE prospects with prototypical measurables http://footballsfuture.com/2012/combine/de.html Mercilus measured in at 6'3 5/8", 261 lbs., with 33 7/8" arms. Hands maybe a little small at 9.5". Everyone else mentioned at the top of the draft, except Coples, is either too short, has too short arms (even Coples' are shorter than you'd like), or doesn't have the college resume to justify a 1st-round pick. And Mercilus tested athletically a lot better than Coples. For comparison's sake, here's JPP's combine measurements (also taken from footballsfuture): 6'4 3/4", 270 lbs., 34 3/4" arms, 10 3/8" hands. Beastly. But also a one-year wonder in a weak conference. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like there'll be a low-risk, high-upside prospect available at #10 this year. There should be some low-risk, low-upside guys and some high-risk, high-upside guys. Will the Bills swing for the fences or bunt the runner over?

As section122 said, we're all pretty happy about this signing, so But there's a couple of points I want to make to reinforce why this signing is so great. First, even with Stevie in the fold, we still have a need at WR. We have quantity but not quality (except for Stevie, who is definitely quality). So if we had let Stevie walk and replaced him with a free agent WR, that guy had better have cost us less than $7.5mil/year. Second, look at the history of veteran WRs changing teams, whether by trade or free agency. There are a few exceptions (Jerry Rice, Randy Moss to NE, James Lofton), but they usually bust(Peerless Price, Randy Moss to OAK, Randy Moss back to MIN, Randy Moss to TEN). So it's hard to figure on signing a free agent to replace Stevie as a lateral move or better. Third, by resigning our own guy prior to free agency, not only do we avoid the risk (compared to replacing him with a free agent), but we also avoided the "Winner's Curse" of bidding for him (or another free agent) on the open market. If you're not familiar with the Winner's Curse, it basically says that when something's up for open bidding, the winner is whoever overvalues the asset the most. Anyone who values the asset correctly will be outbid by someone who overpays. Stevie almost certainly would've gotten more money on the open market, because there would've been several bidders for his services. Instead, the Bills were able to reach a deal that both they and Stevie considered fair. That's a lot better for the Bills. Last, a point about Colston specifically, since he's probably the only marquee free agent that will sign for equal or less than what we paid for Stevie. Colston is a good player. BUT... he's a little injury-prone, very inconsistent, and despite playing in one of the most prolific passing offenses in league history, with a vastly superior QB in Drew Brees, his receiving numbers over the last few years have been almost identical to Stevie's. If Stevie isn't a #1 WR, then Colston isn't even a #2. (For the record, I find the "who is and isn't a #1 WR" debate exhausting, and don't care. Stevie is a good player, and a good starter. So is Colston, but Stevie is better and younger than Colston.)

It's not that I really disagree with what the OP is saying, but it really strikes me as a combination of hyperbole and a strawman. When exactly was the "Age of the shutdown corner"? And how many shutdown corners were actually in the league at that time? 3? Right now, there are two: Revis and Asomugha (although Nnamdi maybe shouldn't count since he's not used as a shutdown corner in Philly's defense). What was this magical time when a team could just put "shutdown corner" on its shopping list and expect to find one? They are very rare, have always been very rare (usually 0-2 active in any particular season), and are extremely valuable. But no matter how valuable Revis is, there's only 1 of him, and the vast majority of fans recognize that. Who are all these people that the OP claims are calling for a stud cornerback? They aren't posting a lot on this board, that's for sure. To sum up: I agree with the OP's main idea that top resources are better spent on pass rushers rather than cornerbacks, but I don't care for the way the author chose to present his argument. No offense intended.

That's why I never make that threat, because I know I'll never go through with it. No matter how disappointing and depressing the team itself gets, it's still something that connects me to Western New York no matter where I live. I won't give up that kinship with my fellow WNYers no matter what. But I *will* B word and moan when things aren't going well. For those fans who are also season-ticket holders, their threats to give up their tickets are much more tangible and realistic. That's a lot of money to commit to a sub-par product when you can watch at least half the games on TV for free. As long as you're using your time machine to add the Hines Ward from 2007, I'm on board.

I'd be really pissed if Stevie leaves. There's been ample opportunity to get a deal done over the last year, so I don't want to hear anything about "oh we tried to bring him back". If they have to overpay, so be it. They stink, and he's the only real quality NFL WR they have (although I do like Nelson & think he'll be a quality WR down the road). Poz and Whitner walk last year. Okay, fine. Whitner was in kind of a toxic situation and it was better for everyone if he left, plus the Bills had a good replacement already on the roster. Poz couldn't really be signed to an extension due to the quirks of the expiring CBA, and once he hit free agency, the Jags gave him that monster contract. Can't fault the Bills a lot there. But there's no excuse with Stevie. None. If someone offers him a ridiculous contract (like Larry Fitzgerald money), the Bills won't be able to match, but that still won't excuse them in the slightest. They've already had plenty of chances to lock him down. I will have no sympathy if they let him go.

Correct!

Yeah, we need to replace Stevie with a guy who never gets open at all against Revis. Then he'll never drop a pass!

Apparently if you were at the stadium (or watching the coach's cam), it was very clear he was throwing it away. No WR within 30 yards, no one had ever been heading that way, etc. Good call by both the letter and spirit of the rule. And good job by Brady not being a total whiner for once.

Nope...At least not IMHO...That's who I want too...Like I said earlier in this thread I'm assuming he comes to the Combine and his Workouts in great shape and all...I think he's a major talent...Top 5 talent if he runs in the 4.5's... Fully agree. Jeffery is a potential beast in the NFL. The main complaint (for me) is that he looks slow on the field, even in his highlights. (Strangely, I've seen some amateur draft sites talk about his speed as a plus, but I chalk that up to the idea that people who watch a ton of college football sometimes get used to the speed of the game, and overlook the difference between college and the NFL. Jeffery is *slow* for the NFL.) I think Jeffery's lack of speed ties directly into his poor conditioning. Someone posted a shirtless picture of Jeffery in another thread, and let's just say it's a bad sign if a WR's physique reminds me of my own flabby self. If Jeffery can get in shape and stay in shape, I think he's absolutely worth the #10 pick, and a potential blue-chip player. Dude catches *everything* thrown within 5 feet of him, and seems to do a great job on jump balls. Really looks like he was born to play WR. Hopefully the poor physique is the result of terrible nutrition rather than a lack of discipline or a poor work ethic. Which could be - a lot of these college kids have no idea how to eat right, and campus food options tend to be very heavy on the deep-fried end. Kevin Love's a good example of a guy who lost a ton of weight after leaving UCLA, mostly because he had someone teach him some basic nutrition and started eating right. +1. At #10 overall, you kind of need to get a premium player. Someone who can make a real impact on the team. Doesn't necessarily need to be right away (especially in the hypothetical case of a QB), but does need to be pretty significant. In recent years, we've had a #9 and #11 pick that were overtly drafted as part-time players. No more of that, please. Take the best player at a position that can really help us. By my count, that's QB, WR, TE, LT, DE, CB - and SLB, but only if the linebacker in question is a legit pass-rusher as a DE on passing downs. Think Matthias Kiwanuka or Von Miller or Bryan Orakpo when the Redskins played a 4-3. A LB who comes off the field on passing downs is a part-time player, and I want no part of that.

I agree with Andre - great move. Can't argue with his results or experience in Indy, and it's great to have a Bills icon back in the fold.