Azalin

Try as you might, you're not going to successfully transition the term "snowflake" to right-wingers, since it's indelibly linked to the leftist millennial SJW hissy-fit generation. Own it. Wear it with pride. You've earned it and you wear it well.

I do. If he's serious then he's not worth the discussion, if he's trolling he's wasting my time.

Sorry you're feeling bad - stomach flu is as miserable as miserable gets. My question is for Kemp. I'm not looking for anything insightful or intelligent by way of response. I just want to know what the hell is so scary about conservatism.

The original statement was: "It's scary what is now considered conservative." I asked: "What is considered to be conservative now that wasn't in the past? Have conservative principles and morality changed somehow?" You answered with: "In certain ways, the definition of neo-conservative changed drastically since the early 1990s" I didn't get the connection between my question and your answer, so I asked it again. Now you answer with: "Since the Reagan years power has been granted based on Conservative promises, they have had to realize that practical governing requires compromise away from lofty ideals." I'm not asking about definitions of neo-conservatism, power granted on "conservative promises", or lofty ideals. What I'm asking is quite literally what has changed with regard to conservative morality and philosophy, and what the hell is so scary about it?

Goo Goo Dolls?

What is considered to be conservative now that wasn't in the past? Have conservative principles and morality changed somehow?

Those were presumably scars left over from when Dutch lit him up like a torch last week.

What is considered to be conservative now that wasn't in the past? Have conservative principles and morality changed somehow?

Or maybe Hogboy?

He did? I'm sorry I missed that - his rants were often epic.

People Incorrectly Typing Acronyms?

The NFL should do as they please. It's not a violation of anybody's free speech if you're an employee of a corporation that requires you to stand during the National Anthem. The government can't compel you to do so, but your employer most certainly can. Don't like it? Then lobby congress to amend the constitution, The NFL will stop observing the national anthem when and if it financially behooves them to do so. On a personal note, if you're triggered by a national anthem, you're a p@ssy. If you're triggered by the Star Spangled Banner in particular, then you're an un-American p@ssy.

Adams gets it.

They appear to be doing a damn fine job, though.

I wouldn't bother. He's either trolling, or he actually has an intellect so dimwitted and myopic that he makes gatorman look like Neils Bohr by comparison. I wouldn't have even seen his response had nobody quoted him. But since I have..... This shouldn't even have to be said: Aside from the idiot who plowed into the crowd with his car, there were a lot of people there with weapons, all ready for a fight. We've all seen the videos by now. Pointing out that there were masked antifa and BLM thugs spoiling for a riot is not a statement of support for white racists, it's a condemnation of violence. Antifa are anything but anti-fascists. They ARE fascists. I am opposed to everything they stand for and do, and I would think that any rational human being of any political stripe would feel the same. Not every condemnation of what happened there needs to be prefaced by an anti-NAZI disclaimer in order to prove how not-racist we are. They're freakin' NAZIs for God's sake. Only the ignorant see this episode as having one group in the right and the other in the wrong. They are all thugs and losers - communists, fascists, and racists on both sides, and society would be far better off without any of them. But by all means, please continue to display your modern sensibilities by calling trash trash, while passing off the garbage as victims, you twat.

Well, they've torched a few cars and buildings at several colleges and universities, as well as threatened harm to faculty and administration if certain invited guests were allowed to speak. They've also burned and looted towns like Ferguson and Baltimore, and begun tearing down monuments in the manner if ISIS and the Taliban that they wish to have erased from our culture. They're an obvious menace. Or did you mean the NAZIs and white supremacists? Well, they're a bunch of hateful, angry, small-minded people who fear and dislike anyone different than they are.

You're right. Liberals have respect for people with philosophies and lifestyles that differ from their own. These modern leftists are every bit as intolerant as anyone I've ever seen. Indeed. It was as tasteless and disgusting as you can imagine.

Thank you for the reminder. I had completely forgotten about the thread you started on the topic. https://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/195417-justice-dept-demands-13m-ip-addresses/

"CNN host Wolf Blitzer said Thursday there would be questions if the Barcelona terror attack involving a van crashing into a group of people was a "copycat" of what happened in Charlottesville, Va." This just means that everyone, and I mean everyone in Spain will now know that Wolf Blitzer is a complete F$#%ing retard. What a pathetic attempt at trying to tie two completely different tragedies together.

Just use the ignore function. It's the perfect tool for filtering troll feces.

Yes, due process, Einstein. The kid in the car has been arrested and will stand trial. That's due process. And who here has said anything about "pacifying" Nazis? This is gator-level idiocy on your part, which makes you appear to be nothing more than a second rate troll.

Especially when you advocate silencing them and disarming them without due process.

Fools